• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠息肉内镜治疗的算法方法:最新综述

Algorithmic approach for endoscopic management of colorectal polyps: an up-to-date review.

作者信息

Sadeghi Amir, Yousefian Astaneh Ali, Arabpour Erfan, Zali Mohammad Reza

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2025;18(1):39-52. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v18i1.3085.

DOI:10.22037/ghfbb.v18i1.3085
PMID:40734813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12301536/
Abstract

With the growing incidence of colorectal cancer worldwide, mainly due to increased early detection in screening programs, usage of endoscopic techniques for management of colorectal lesions have been gaining progressive attention. Each year, more advanced endoscopic techniques come to practice and old ones find technical enhancements. By reviewing guidelines, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and original research, we aim to establish an evidence-based approach for selecting the optimal endoscopic method based on the polyp size, morphology, and classification. We critically analyze the advantages, limitations, and potential complications associated with each technique, providing a comprehensive overview for clinicians and suggest areas which may yet need further studies to be conducted. Our comprehensive review can provide a framework that will help clinicians choose an approach most suitable for their patients. This review attempts to contribute to the optimization of endoscopic management in colorectal polyps, with eventual improvement in patient outcomes.

摘要

随着全球结直肠癌发病率的上升,主要归因于筛查项目中早期检测的增加,用于结直肠病变管理的内镜技术越来越受到关注。每年,更多先进的内镜技术开始应用,旧技术也有技术改进。通过回顾指南、随机对照试验、荟萃分析和原始研究,我们旨在建立一种基于证据的方法,根据息肉大小、形态和分类选择最佳内镜方法。我们批判性地分析了每种技术的优点、局限性和潜在并发症,为临床医生提供全面概述,并指出可能仍需进一步研究的领域。我们的全面综述可以提供一个框架,帮助临床医生选择最适合其患者的方法。本综述试图为结直肠息肉内镜管理的优化做出贡献,最终改善患者预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c2/12301536/6c0ae608fc13/GHFBB-18-39-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c2/12301536/6c0ae608fc13/GHFBB-18-39-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c2/12301536/6c0ae608fc13/GHFBB-18-39-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Algorithmic approach for endoscopic management of colorectal polyps: an up-to-date review.结直肠息肉内镜治疗的算法方法:最新综述
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2025;18(1):39-52. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v18i1.3085.
2
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.结直肠癌的化学预防:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(32):1-206. doi: 10.3310/hta14320.
3
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
6
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
7
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
8
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
9
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
10
Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis.用于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的不同类型鼻内类固醇
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011993. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011993.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.冷圈套内镜黏膜切除术与热圈套内镜黏膜切除术治疗小大肠息肉的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20335. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71067-1.
2
Results of the COLDWATER randomized controlled trial: enhanced performance of underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps 5-10 mm, independent of endoscopist experience.冷水随机对照试验结果:水下冷圈套息肉切除术对5-10毫米大肠息肉的切除效果更佳,与内镜医师经验无关。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul-Aug;37(4):466-475. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0889. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Randomized Controlled German CHRONICLE Trial.
冷圈套与热圈套内镜切除术治疗大型无蒂结直肠息肉:随机对照德国 CHRONICLE 试验。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Sep;167(4):764-777. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.05.013. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Bleeding Risk of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Measuring 10 mm or Less: Subgroup Analysis of a Large Randomized Controlled Trial.冷切除与热圈套息肉切除术治疗 10mm 或以下带蒂结直肠息肉的出血风险:一项大型随机对照试验的亚组分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 1;119(11):2233-2240. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002847. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
Risk factors for delayed colorectal postpolypectomy bleeding: a meta-analysis.延迟性结直肠息肉切除术后出血的风险因素:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 May 14;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03251-6.
6
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.结直肠息肉切除术和内镜黏膜切除术:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-2024 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2024 Jul;56(7):516-545. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-3219. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
7
Predictive factors associated with technical difficulty in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID) multicenter study.与结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术技术难度相关的预测因素:韩国肠病研究协会(HASID)多中心研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 26;103(17):e37936. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037936.
8
The Effectiveness of Prophylactic Epinephrine Compared to No Prophylaxis for Postpolypectomy Bleeding in Endoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.预防性肾上腺素与不进行预防措施在内镜下结直肠手术息肉切除术后出血中的效果比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2024 Mar 23;16(3):e56778. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56778. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
HOT VERSUS COLD SNARE FOR COLORECTAL POLYPECTOMIES SIZED UP TO 10MM: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS.用于切除直径达10毫米的大肠息肉的热圈套器与冷圈套器:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arq Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 15;61:e23143. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.246102023-143. eCollection 2024.
10
The Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multicenter Observational Study.直接口服抗凝剂在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中的管理:一项多中心观察性研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Mar;69(3):933-939. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08316-w. Epub 2024 Feb 10.