In-Hospital Amantadine Does Not Improve Outcomes After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An 11-Year Propensity-Matched Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND

Disruption of dopamine neurotransmission is associated with functional impairment after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). This has prompted the study of dopamine agonists, such as amantadine, to assist recovery of consciousness. Randomized trials have mostly addressed the posthospital setting, with inconsistent findings. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of early amantadine administration on recovery of consciousness after sTBI.

METHODS

We searched the medical records of all patients with sTBI admitted to our hospital between 2010 and 2021 who survived 10 days postinjury. We identified all patients receiving amantadine and compared them with all patients not receiving amantadine and a propensity score-matched nonamantadine group. Primary outcome measures included discharge Glasgow Coma Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score, length of stay, mortality, recovery of command-following (CF), and days to CF.

RESULTS

In our study population, 60 patients received amantadine and 344 did not. Compared with the propensity score-matched nonamantadine group, the amantadine group had no difference in mortality (86.67% vs. 88.33%, P = 0.783), rates of CF (73.33% vs. 76.67%, P = 0.673), or percentage of patients with severe (3-8) discharge Glasgow Coma Scale scores (11.11% vs. 12.28%, P = 0.434). In addition, the amantadine group was less likely to have a favorable recovery (discharge Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score 5-8) (14.53% vs. 16.67%, P < 0.001), had a longer length of stay (40.5 vs. 21.0 days, P < 0.001), and had a longer time to CF (11.5 vs. 6.0 days, P = 0.011). No difference in adverse events existed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not support the early administration of amantadine for sTBI. Larger inpatient randomized trials are necessary to further investigate amantadine treatment for sTBI.