Norin A J, De Pinho R A
Immunology. 1986 Aug;58(4):561-8.
An important strategy in defining the mechanisms by which macrophages (M phi) kill microorganisms and tumour cells has been to elucidate the structural and functional properties that are unique to cytolytic M phi. Previous studies have suggested that cytolytic and non-cytolytic inflammatory macrophages have similar levels of phagocytic activity. This issue was examined further by measuring the rate and efficiency of phagocytosis (ratio of the number of ingested particles to the number of particles initially attached to the M phi surface) of concanavalin A-induced M phi (Con A-M phi), a cytolytic inflammatory M phi, and thioglycolate medium-induced M phi (TM-M phi), a non-cytolytic inflammatory M phi. These experiments were performed with freshly M phi populations since activated M phi lost enhanced cytolytic and phagocytic activity with culture. Both cytolytic M phi and non-cytolytic inflammatory M phi were capable of ingesting complement-coated erythrocytes, E(IgM)C, when compared to resident M phi. However, Con A-M phi had a three-fold greater rate of C3-dependent phagocytosis and an 18-fold greater efficiency of C3-dependent particle internalization than TM-M phi. In contrast, the rate and efficiency and Fc-mediated phagocytosis did not distinguish Con A-M phi from TM-M phi, though both types of inflammatory cells ingested significantly more E(IgG) than resident M phi. Quantitative differences in C3-dependent phagocytic activity may occur as a result of higher concentrations of C3 receptors at sites of E(IgM)C attachment, thereby driving membrane pseudopod extension at a greater rate.
确定巨噬细胞(M phi)杀灭微生物和肿瘤细胞机制的一个重要策略是阐明溶细胞性M phi特有的结构和功能特性。先前的研究表明,溶细胞性和非溶细胞性炎性巨噬细胞的吞噬活性水平相似。通过测量伴刀豆球蛋白A诱导的M phi(Con A-M phi,一种溶细胞性炎性M phi)和巯基乙酸盐培养基诱导的M phi(TM-M phi,一种非溶细胞性炎性M phi)的吞噬速率和效率(摄入颗粒数与最初附着在M phi表面的颗粒数之比),进一步研究了这个问题。这些实验是用新鲜的M phi群体进行的,因为活化的M phi在培养过程中会丧失增强的溶细胞和吞噬活性。与驻留M phi相比,溶细胞性M phi和非溶细胞性炎性M phi都能够摄取补体包被的红细胞E(IgM)C。然而,Con A-M phi的C3依赖性吞噬速率比TM-M phi高3倍,C3依赖性颗粒内化效率比TM-M phi高18倍。相比之下,尽管两种炎性细胞摄取的E(IgG)都明显多于驻留M phi,但Con A-M phi和TM-M phi在Fc介导的吞噬速率和效率上没有区别。C3依赖性吞噬活性的定量差异可能是由于E(IgM)C附着部位的C3受体浓度较高,从而以更高的速率驱动膜伪足延伸所致。