Satake Kana, Iijima Kenta
Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center: Hyogo Kenritsu Amagasaki Sogo Iryo Center, Amagasaki, JPN.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center: Hyogo Kenritsu Amagasaki Sogo Iryo Center, Amagasaki, JPN.
Cureus. 2023 May 18;15(5):e39176. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39176. eCollection 2023 May.
Ceftriaxone-induced neutropenia is a rare and severe adverse effect of the drug. It usually resolves in one to three weeks following the cessation of ceftriaxone and the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). After neutrophil recovery, patients are often treated with non-β-lactam antibiotics instead of ceftriaxone due to the possibility of cross-reactivity associated with β-lactam allergy. However, in some cases, β-lactam antibiotics are superior to non-β-lactam antibiotics. Few cases of the readministration of β-lactam antibiotics for patients who developed ceftriaxone-induced neutropenia have been reported so far. Moreover, its pathogenesis and management have still not been established. We describe a case of successful readministration of β-lactam antibiotics for a patient who had developed ceftriaxone-induced neutropenia. A 37-year-old man with a prosthetic aortic valve was admitted to our hospital with a fever. Blood culture on admission revealed methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed aortic valve vegetation with multiple septic emboli seen on brain CT. We diagnosed MSSA infective endocarditis with central nervous complications. He underwent an operation and was treated with ceftriaxone. On admission day 28, he developed neutropenia (33/μL), and ceftriaxone-induced neutropenia was suspected. Vancomycin was started instead of ceftriaxone, and his neutrophil count recovered within two weeks with the administration of G-CSF. After recovery, on day 40 of admission, ampicillin sodium was administered instead of vancomycin. Although he developed mild eosinophilia, he did not exhibit neutropenia and was discharged with an amoxicillin prescription on day 60 of admission. Our report suggests the possibility that patients who develop ceftriaxone-induced neutropenia can be treated safely with an alternative β-lactam antibiotic, ampicillin sodium, without causing β-lactam cross-reactivity of neutropenia.
头孢曲松所致中性粒细胞减少是该药物一种罕见且严重的不良反应。通常在停用头孢曲松并给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)后1至3周内缓解。中性粒细胞恢复后,由于存在与β-内酰胺类过敏相关的交叉反应可能性,患者常接受非β-内酰胺类抗生素而非头孢曲松治疗。然而,在某些情况下,β-内酰胺类抗生素优于非β-内酰胺类抗生素。迄今为止,鲜有关于发生头孢曲松所致中性粒细胞减少的患者再次使用β-内酰胺类抗生素的病例报道。此外,其发病机制和治疗方法仍未明确。我们描述了一例成功再次使用β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗发生头孢曲松所致中性粒细胞减少患者的病例。一名患有人工主动脉瓣的37岁男性因发热入院。入院时血培养显示为甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌血症,经食管超声心动图(TEE)显示主动脉瓣赘生物,脑部CT可见多发脓毒性栓子。我们诊断为伴有中枢神经系统并发症的MSSA感染性心内膜炎。他接受了手术并接受头孢曲松治疗。入院第28天,他出现中性粒细胞减少(33/μL),怀疑为头孢曲松所致中性粒细胞减少。停用头孢曲松,开始使用万古霉素,给予G-CSF后,他的中性粒细胞计数在两周内恢复。恢复后,入院第40天,给予氨苄西林钠替代万古霉素。尽管他出现了轻度嗜酸性粒细胞增多,但未出现中性粒细胞减少,入院第60天带阿莫西林处方出院。我们的报告提示,发生头孢曲松所致中性粒细胞减少的患者使用替代β-内酰胺类抗生素氨苄西林钠进行治疗可能是安全的,不会引起中性粒细胞减少的β-内酰胺类交叉反应。