Inoue Jumpei, Yasui Youichi, Sasahara Jun, Takenaga Tetsuya, Wakabayashi Kenjiro, Nozaki Masahiro, Kobayashi Makoto, Ha Myongsu, Fukushima Hiroaki, Kato Jiro, Miyamoto Wataru, Kawano Hirotaka, Murakami Hideki, Yoshida Masahito
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jun 2;11(6):23259671231174477. doi: 10.1177/23259671231174477. eCollection 2023 Jun.
For needle arthroscopy with 0° viewing, the visible range of intra-articular structures and the difference between portals remain unknown, as do the risks for neurovascular tissue at each portal.
To clarify the visibility and safety of needle arthroscopy.
Descriptive laboratory study.
Ten cadaveric ankle specimens were used. A needle arthroscope with a 1.9-mm diameter was inserted from 4 portals (anteromedial [AM], anterolateral [AL], medial midline [MM], and anterocentral [AC]). Visibility was assessed using a 15-point ankle arthroscopy checklist. In addition, the ankles were dissected to measure the distance between each portal and neurovascular tissues. The visibility of the ankle joint was compared between portals.
The success rate of visibility in the deltoid ligament and the tip of the medial malleolus was 100% from the AM, MM, and AC portals and 10% from the AL portal, with significant differences between the portals ( < .01). The visibility success rates in the origin of the anterior talofibular ligament and the tip of the lateral malleolus were 20% for the AM portal, 90% for the MM and AC portals, and 100% for the AL portal, with significant differences between the portals ( < .01). All other points of the ankle joint were visualized from all the portals with a 100% success rate. The AC portal was in contact with the anterior neurovascular bundle in 4 of the 10 specimens.
When needle arthroscopy was performed from the AM or AL portal, the site opposite to the portal in the ankle joint was difficult to visualize. Conversely, most points of the ankle joint could be visualized from the MM and AC portals. Care should be taken when creating an AC portal because of its proximity to the anterior neurovascular bundle.
The present study provides information regarding which portal should be selected to perform needle arthroscopy in the ankle joint, which will be beneficial for management of ankle injuries.
对于0°视角的针式关节镜检查,关节内结构的可视范围以及不同入路之间的差异尚不清楚,每个入路处神经血管组织的风险也不明确。
阐明针式关节镜检查的可视性和安全性。
描述性实验室研究。
使用10个尸体踝关节标本。将直径1.9毫米的针式关节镜从4个入路(前内侧[AM]、前外侧[AL]、内侧中线[MM]和前中央[AC])插入。使用15项踝关节镜检查清单评估可视性。此外,对踝关节进行解剖,测量每个入路与神经血管组织之间的距离。比较不同入路之间踝关节的可视性。
从AM、MM和AC入路观察三角韧带和内踝尖的可视成功率为100%,从AL入路为10%,不同入路之间存在显著差异(P<0.01)。前距腓韧带起点和外踝尖的可视成功率,AM入路为20%,MM和AC入路为90%,AL入路为100%,不同入路之间存在显著差异(P<0.01)。踝关节的所有其他部位从所有入路观察的成功率均为100%。在10个标本中的4个中,AC入路与前神经血管束接触。
当从AM或AL入路进行针式关节镜检查时,踝关节中与入路相对的部位难以观察到。相反,踝关节的大多数部位可从MM和AC入路观察到。由于AC入路靠近前神经血管束,在建立该入路时应谨慎。
本研究提供了有关在踝关节进行针式关节镜检查应选择哪个入路的信息,这将有助于踝关节损伤的处理。