• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健市场整合趋势与影响的环境扫描

Environmental Scan on Consolidation Trends and Impacts in Health Care Markets.

作者信息

Liu Jodi L, Levinson Zachary M, Zhou Annetta, Zhao Xiaoxi, Nguyen PhuongGiang, Qureshi Nabeel

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2023 Jun 16;10(3):2. eCollection 2023 Jun.

PMID:37333669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10273895/
Abstract

The No Surprises Act (NSA) was created to help protect consumers with private insurance from surprise medical bills from out-of-network health care providers. The NSA requires the Department of Health and Human Services to prepare annual reports to Congress on the effects of the NSA's provisions. This article summarizes findings of an environmental scan on consolidation trends and impacts in health care markets. It describes the evidence on price, spending, quality of care, access, and wages in health care provider and insurance markets, as well as other market trends. The authors found strong evidence that hospital horizontal consolidation is associated with higher prices paid to providers and some evidence of the same for vertical consolidation of hospitals and physician practices. Health care spending is likely to increase in tandem with these price increases. Most studies find decreased or no change in quality of care associated with consolidation; however, findings differ by quality measures examined and setting. Horizontal consolidation of commercial insurers is associated with lower prices paid to providers as insurers gain market power in negotiations with providers, but the lower prices paid to providers do not appear to be passed onto consumers, who face higher premiums following insurer consolidation. There is insufficient evidence of the effects on patient access to care and health care wages. The few evaluations of state surprise billing laws have found heterogeneous effects on prices and have not directly examined effects on spending, quality, patient access, and wages.

摘要

《无意外法案》(NSA)旨在帮助保护拥有私人保险的消费者免受非网络医疗服务提供者的意外医疗账单困扰。该法案要求美国卫生与公众服务部向国会提交关于NSA条款影响的年度报告。本文总结了对医疗保健市场整合趋势及影响的环境扫描结果。它描述了医疗服务提供者和保险市场在价格、支出、医疗质量、可及性和工资方面的证据,以及其他市场趋势。作者发现有力证据表明医院横向整合与支付给医疗服务提供者的更高价格相关,并且有一些证据表明医院和医生业务的纵向整合也存在同样情况。随着这些价格上涨,医疗保健支出可能会同步增加。大多数研究发现整合与医疗质量下降或无变化相关;然而,研究结果因所考察的质量指标和环境而异。商业保险公司的横向整合与支付给医疗服务提供者的较低价格相关,因为保险公司在与医疗服务提供者的谈判中获得了市场力量,但支付给医疗服务提供者的较低价格似乎并未传递给消费者,消费者在保险公司整合后面临更高的保费。关于对患者获得医疗服务的机会和医疗保健工资的影响,证据不足。对各州意外账单法律的少数评估发现对价格有不同影响,且未直接考察对支出、质量、患者可及性和工资的影响。

相似文献

1
Environmental Scan on Consolidation Trends and Impacts in Health Care Markets.医疗保健市场整合趋势与影响的环境扫描
Rand Health Q. 2023 Jun 16;10(3):2. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Market Share Matters: Evidence Of Insurer And Provider Bargaining Over Prices.市场份额至关重要:保险公司与医疗服务提供商就价格进行讨价还价的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):141-148. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0479.
3
Association of Surprise-Billing Legislation with Prices Paid to In-Network and Out-of-Network Anesthesiologists in California, Florida, and New York: An Economic Analysis.加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约州意外账单立法与支付给网络内和网络外麻醉医师的价格之间的关联:一项经济分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1324-1331. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4564.
4
Insurer Market Power Lowers Prices In Numerous Concentrated Provider Markets.保险市场势力降低了众多集中供应商市场的价格。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1539-1546. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0552.
5
Physician practice competition and prices paid by private insurers for office visits.医生执业竞争与私人保险公司支付的门诊费用。
JAMA. 2014;312(16):1653-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10921.
6
Market power and provider consolidation in physician markets.医师市场中的市场势力与供应商整合。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Mar;15(1):99-126. doi: 10.1007/s10754-014-9160-y. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
7
Do State Bans of Most-Favored-Nation Contract Clauses Restrain Price Growth? Evidence From Hospital Prices.州政府是否禁止最惠国待遇合同条款来限制价格增长?来自医院价格的证据。
Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):589-615. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12568. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Hospital pricing: cost shifting and competition.医院定价:成本转嫁与竞争。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1993 May(137):1-17.
9
10
Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.医生和医院之间财务融合与商业医疗价格的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4610.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Factors Associated With Commercial-to-Medicare Relative Prices at the Substate Level.州以下层面商业保险与医疗保险相对价格的潜在相关因素。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251640. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1640.
2
Physician mergers involve 38% of doctors, substantial health system participation, and frequent serial acquisition.医生合并涉及38%的医生,医疗系统参与度高,且频繁进行连环收购。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 May 19;3(5):qxaf061. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf061. eCollection 2025 May.
3
What explains the growth in hospital assets from 2000 through 2019? A decomposition analysis.如何解释2000年至2019年期间医院资产的增长?一项分解分析。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Feb 5;3(2):qxaf004. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf004. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
How do hospitals exert market power? Evidence from health systems and commercial health plan prices.医院如何发挥市场力量?来自医疗系统和商业健康保险计划价格的证据。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jan 16;3(1):qxae179. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae179. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality and Safety Outcomes of a Hospital Merger Following a Full Integration at a Safety Net Hospital.一家医疗保障机构医院在全面整合后合并的质量和安全结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142382. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42382.