Suppr超能文献

加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约州意外账单立法与支付给网络内和网络外麻醉医师的价格之间的关联:一项经济分析

Association of Surprise-Billing Legislation with Prices Paid to In-Network and Out-of-Network Anesthesiologists in California, Florida, and New York: An Economic Analysis.

作者信息

La Forgia Ambar, Bond Amelia M, Braun Robert Tyler, Kjaer Klaus, Zhang Manyao, Casalino Lawrence P

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Division of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1324-1331. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4564.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Several states have passed surprise-billing legislation to protect patients from unanticipated out-of-network medical bills, yet little is known about how state laws influence out-of-network prices and whether spillovers exist to in-network prices.

OBJECTIVE

To identify any changes in prices paid to out-of-network anesthesiologists at in-network facilities and to in-network anesthesiologists before and after states passed surprise-billing legislation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective economic analysis used difference-in-differences methods to compare price changes before and after the passage of legislation in California, Florida, and New York, which passed comprehensive surprise-billing legislation between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017, to 45 states that did not. Commercial claims data from the Health Care Cost Institute were used to identify prices paid to anesthesiologists in hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgery centers. The final analytic sample comprised 2 713 913 anesthesia claims across the 3 treated states and the 45 control states.

EXPOSURES

Temporal and state-level variation in exposure to surprise-billing legislation.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The unit price (allowed amounts standardized per unit of service) paid to out-of-network anesthesiologists at in-network facilities and to in-network anesthesiologists.

RESULTS

This retrospective economic analysis of 2 713 913 anesthesia claims found that after surprise-billing laws were passed in 3 states, the unit price paid to out-of-network anesthesiologists at in-network facilities decreased significantly in 2 of them: California, -$12.71 (95% CI, -$25.70 to -$0.27; P = .05) and Florida, -$35.67 (95% CI, -$46.27 to -$25.07; P < .001). In New York, a decline in the overall out-of-network price was not statistically significant (-$7.91; 95% CI, -$17.48 to -$1.68; P = .10); however, by the fourth quarter of 2017, the decline was -$41.28 (95% CI, -$70.24 to -$12.33; P = .01). In-network prices decreased in California by -$10.68 (95% CI, -$12.70 to -$8.66; P < .001); in Florida, -$3.18 (95% CI, -$5.17 to -$1.19; P = .002); and in New York, -$8.05 (95% CI, -$11.46 to -$4.64; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This retrospective study found that prices paid to in-network and out-of-network anesthesiologists in hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgery centers decreased after the introduction of surprise-billing legislation, providing early insights into how prices may change under the federal No Surprises Act and in states that have recently passed their own legislation.

摘要

重要性

几个州已通过意外账单立法,以保护患者免受意外的网络外医疗账单影响,但对于州法律如何影响网络外价格以及是否存在对网络内价格的溢出效应知之甚少。

目的

确定在州通过意外账单立法前后,网络内医疗机构支付给网络外麻醉师以及网络内麻醉师的价格变化。

设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性经济分析采用差分法,比较了加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约州在2014年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间通过全面意外账单立法的3个州,与未通过的45个州立法前后的价格变化。利用医疗保健成本研究所的商业索赔数据,确定医院门诊部和门诊手术中心支付给麻醉师的价格。最终分析样本包括3个处理州和45个对照州的2713913份麻醉索赔。

暴露因素

意外账单立法的时间和州层面的变化。

主要结局和指标

网络内医疗机构支付给网络外麻醉师以及网络内麻醉师的单价(每服务单位标准化的允许金额)。

结果

这项对2713913份麻醉索赔的回顾性经济分析发现,在3个州通过意外账单法律后,其中2个州网络内医疗机构支付给网络外麻醉师的单价显著下降:加利福尼亚州,下降12.71美元(95%置信区间,-25.70美元至-0.27美元;P = 0.05);佛罗里达州,下降35.67美元(95%置信区间,-46.27美元至-25.07美元;P < 0.001)。在纽约州,网络外总体价格下降无统计学意义(-7.91美元;95%置信区间,-17.48美元至-1.68美元;P = 0.10);然而,到2017年第四季度,下降了41.28美元(95%置信区间,-70.24美元至-12.33美元;P = 0.01)。加利福尼亚州网络内价格下降了10.68美元(95%置信区间,-12.70美元至-8.66美元;P < 0.001);佛罗里达州,下降3.18美元(95%置信区间,-5.17美元至-1.19美元;P = 0.002);纽约州,下降8.05美元(95%置信区间,-11.46美元至-4.64美元;P < 0.001)。

结论与意义

这项回顾性研究发现,在引入意外账单立法后,医院门诊部和门诊手术中心支付给网络内和网络外麻醉师的价格下降,为联邦《无意外法案》以及最近通过自身立法的州的价格可能如何变化提供了早期见解。

相似文献

3
The impacts of New York's balance billing regulation on ground ambulance pricing.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60(2):e14387. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14387. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
Out-of-Network Air Ambulance Bills: Prevalence, Magnitude, and Policy Solutions.
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):747-774. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12464. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
Provider Charges And State Surprise Billing Laws: Evidence From New York And California.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1316-1323. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01332.
7
Federal Out-of-Network Balance Billing Legislation: Context and Implications for Radiology Practices.
Radiology. 2021 Sep;300(3):506-511. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210491. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
The Price-Quality Mismatch: Are Negotiated Prices for Total Joint Arthroplasty Associated With Hospital Quality in a Large California Health System?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1061-1068. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002489. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
10
Prevalence And Characteristics Of Surprise Out-Of-Network Bills From Professionals In Ambulatory Surgery Centers.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):783-790. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01138. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional variation in financial hardship among US veterans during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Jun 5;2(6):qxae075. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae075. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Association between "Balance Billing" Legislation and Anesthesia Payments in California: A Retrospective Analysis.
Anesthesiology. 2023 Nov 1;139(5):580-590. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004675.
3
Options for states to constrain pricing power of health care providers.
Front Health Serv. 2022 Oct 19;2:1020920. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1020920. eCollection 2022.
4
Rapid Review of "No Surprise" Medical Billing in the United States: Stakeholder Perceptions and Challenges.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 5;11(5):761. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050761.
5
Less Than One-third of Hospitals Provide Compliant Price Transparency Information for Total Joint Arthroplasty Procedures.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2316-2326. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002288. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
6
Geographic Variation in Hospital-Based Physician Participation in Insurance Networks.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2215414. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15414.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations Between a New York City Paid Sick Leave Mandate and Health Care Utilization Among Medicaid Beneficiaries in New York City and New York State.
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 6;2(5):e210342. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0342. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Prevalence And Characteristics Of Surprise Out-Of-Network Bills From Professionals In Ambulatory Surgery Centers.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):783-790. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01138. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
3
Out-Of-Network Billing And Negotiated Payments For Hospital-Based Physicians.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):24-32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00507. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
5
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验