Diagnostic value of [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor versus [ 18 F]FDG PET/CTs in non-small cell lung cancer: a head-to-head comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic value of [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Patients with pathology-proven NSCLC were prospectively included. Patients underwent [ 18 F]FDG and [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT within 1 week. All suspicious lesions were interpreted as benign or malignant, and the corresponding PET/CT semi-quantitative parameters were recorded. A two-sided P -value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Twelve consecutive NSCLC patients (mean age: 60 ± 7) were included. All patients underwent both [ 18 F]FDG and [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT scans with a median interval of 2 days. Overall, 73 abnormal lesions were detected, from which 58 (79%) were concordant between [ 18 F]FDG and [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT. All primary tumors were clearly detectable in both scans visually. Also, [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT demonstrated rather comparable results with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT scan in detecting metastatic lesions. However, malignant lesions demonstrated significantly higher SUVmax and SUVmean in [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT ( P -values <0.05). Regarding the advantages, [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor depicted two brain metastases that were missed by [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT. Also, a highly suspicious lesion for recurrence on [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT scan was correctly classified as benign by subsequent [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

[ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT was concordant with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in detecting primary NSCLC tumors and could visualize the majority of metastatic lesions. Moreover, this modality was found to be potentially helpful in excluding tumoural lesions when the [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT was equivocal, as well as in detecting brain metastasis where [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT suffers from poor sensitivity. However, the count statistics were significantly lower.