• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病与颈动脉内膜切除术术后不良结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diabetes mellitus and adverse outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.

Department of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410031, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Jun 20;136(12):1401-1409. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002730. Epub 2023 May 22.

DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000002730
PMID:37334731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10278750/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is still uncertainty regarding whether diabetes mellitus (DM) can adversely affect patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for carotid stenosis. The aim of the study was to assess the adverse impact of DM on patients with carotid stenosis treated by CEA.

METHODS

Eligible studies published between 1 January 2000 and 30 March 2023 were selected from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials databases. The short-term and long-term outcomes of major adverse events (MAEs), death, stroke, the composite outcomes of death/stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) were collected to calculate the pooled effect sizes (ESs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and prevalence of adverse outcomes. Subgroup analysis by asymptomatic/symptomatic carotid stenosis and insulin/noninsulin-dependent DM was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies (n = 122,003) were included. Regarding the short-term outcomes, DM was associated with increased risks of MAEs (ES = 1.52, 95% CI: [1.15-2.01], prevalence = 5.1%), death/stroke (ES = 1.61, 95% CI: [1.13-2.28], prevalence = 2.3%), stroke (ES = 1.55, 95% CI: [1.16-1.55], prevalence = 3.5%), death (ES = 1.70, 95% CI: [1.25-2.31], prevalence =1.2%), and MI (ES = 1.52, 95% CI: [1.15-2.01], prevalence = 1.4%). DM was associated with increased risks of long-term MAEs (ES = 1.24, 95% CI: [1.04-1.49], prevalence = 12.2%). In the subgroup analysis, DM was associated with an increased risk of short-term MAEs, death/stroke, stroke, and MI in asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA and with only short-term MAEs in the symptomatic patients. Both insulin- and noninsulin-dependent DM patients had an increased risk of short-term and long-term MAEs, and insulin-dependent DM was also associated with the short-term risk of death/stroke, death, and MI.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with carotid stenosis treated by CEA, DM is associated with short-term and long-term MAEs. DM may have a greater impact on adverse outcomes in asymptomatic patients after CEA. Insulin-dependent DM may have a more significant impact on post-CEA adverse outcomes than noninsulin-dependent DM. Whether DM management could reduce the risk of adverse outcomes after CEA requires further investigation.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)是否会对颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的患者产生不良影响仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在评估 DM 对接受 CEA 治疗的颈动脉狭窄患者的不良影响。

方法

从 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、CENTRAL 和 ClinicalTrials 数据库中选取 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 30 日发表的符合条件的研究。收集主要不良事件(MAE)、死亡、卒中和死亡/卒中等复合结局以及心肌梗死(MI)的短期和长期结局,以计算汇总效应量(ES)、95%置信区间(CI)和不良结局的患病率。对无症状/有症状颈动脉狭窄和胰岛素/非胰岛素依赖性 DM 进行亚组分析。

结果

共纳入 19 项研究(n = 122003 例)。关于短期结局,DM 与 MAE(ES = 1.52,95%CI:[1.15-2.01],患病率 = 5.1%)、死亡/卒中和卒中(ES = 1.61,95%CI:[1.13-2.28],患病率 = 2.3%)、卒中和死亡(ES = 1.70,95%CI:[1.25-2.31],患病率 = 1.2%)和 MI(ES = 1.52,95%CI:[1.15-2.01],患病率 = 1.4%)的风险增加相关。DM 与长期 MAE(ES = 1.24,95%CI:[1.04-1.49],患病率 = 12.2%)风险增加相关。在亚组分析中,DM 与无症状患者 CEA 后短期 MAE、死亡/卒中和卒中以及 MI 的风险增加相关,而在有症状患者中仅与短期 MAE 风险增加相关。胰岛素依赖性和非胰岛素依赖性 DM 患者的短期和长期 MAE 风险均增加,胰岛素依赖性 DM 与 CEA 后短期死亡/卒中和死亡以及 MI 的风险增加也相关。

结论

在接受 CEA 治疗的颈动脉狭窄患者中,DM 与短期和长期 MAE 相关。DM 可能对 CEA 后无症状患者的不良结局产生更大影响。与非胰岛素依赖性 DM 相比,胰岛素依赖性 DM 对 CEA 后不良结局的影响可能更为显著。DM 管理是否能降低 CEA 后不良结局的风险,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10278750/2c4646ca920d/cm9-136-1401-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10278750/23e1bb1f3b5c/cm9-136-1401-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10278750/f3ba9d352a2a/cm9-136-1401-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10278750/2c4646ca920d/cm9-136-1401-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10278750/23e1bb1f3b5c/cm9-136-1401-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10278750/f3ba9d352a2a/cm9-136-1401-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc4/10278750/2c4646ca920d/cm9-136-1401-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Diabetes mellitus and adverse outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病与颈动脉内膜切除术术后不良结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Jun 20;136(12):1401-1409. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002730. Epub 2023 May 22.
2
Endarterectomy achieves lower stroke and death rates compared with stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者,与支架置入术相比,动脉内膜切除术可降低中风和死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.053.
3
Sex differences in outcome after carotid revascularization in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.症状性和无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉血运重建术后结局的性别差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Sep;78(3):817-827.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.502. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.经皮腔内球囊血管成形术及支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub4.
5
Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD001923. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001923.pub2.
6
Meta-Analysis Investigating the Association between the Degree of Chronic Kidney Disease and Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.Meta分析:探讨慢性肾脏病程度与有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术预后之间的关联
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 May 23;121:201-216. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2025.05.017.
7
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.经皮腔内血管成形术及支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub2.
8
Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy for Treatment of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的比较
Int Heart J. 2018 May 30;59(3):550-558. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-312. Epub 2018 May 20.
9
Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke.外翻式与传统颈动脉内膜切除术预防卒中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2000(1):CD001921. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001921.
10
Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction After Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术后围手术期心肌梗死:系统评价与荟萃分析
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):2843-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010052. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
C/EBPβ-Lin28a positive feedback loop triggered by C/EBPβ hypomethylation enhances the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells in restenosis.由C/EBPβ低甲基化触发的C/EBPβ-Lin28a正反馈回路增强了再狭窄中血管平滑肌细胞的增殖和迁移。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2025 Feb 20;138(4):419-429. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003110. Epub 2024 May 28.