Suppr超能文献

原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的生活质量:随机SCORPION试验(NCT01461850)的结果

Quality of life in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from the randomised SCORPION trial (NCT01461850).

作者信息

Marchetti Claudia, Giannarelli Diana, Vizzielli Giuseppe, Ferrandina GabriellaM, Tortorella Lucia, Fanfani Francesco, Costantini Barbara, Pasciuto Tina, Scambia Giovanni, Fagotti Anna

机构信息

Division Gynaecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BJOG. 2023 Dec;130(13):1579-1588. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17558. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS), versus primary debulking surgery (PDS), on quality of life (QoL) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

DESIGN

Randomised trial conducted in a single institution.

SETTING

Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

SAMPLE

Patients with stage-IIIC/IV EOC and high tumour load.

METHODS

Patients were randomised (1:1) to undergo either PDS (PDS group) or NACT followed by IDS (NACT/IDS group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality-of-life (QoL) data, assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core QoL questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and ovarian cancer module (OV28); co-primary outcomes were the QLQ-C30 global health score at 12 months (cross-sectional analysis) and the difference in mean QLQ-C30 global health score over time between treatment groups (longitudinal analysis).

RESULTS

From October 2011 to May 2016, 171 patients were enrolled (PDS = 84; NACT/IDS = 87). We observed no clinical or statistically significant difference between treatment groups in any of the QoL functioning scales at 12 months, including QLQ-C30 global health score (NACT/IDS group vs PDS group, mean difference 4.7, 95% CI -4.99 to 14.4, p = 0.340). Over time, we found lower global health scores for those undergoing PDS than for those receiving NACT (difference in mean score 6.27, 95% CI 0.440-12.11, p = 0.035), albeit this was not clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in global QoL related to treatment approach at 12 months, even though patients in the NACT/IDS group reported better global health scores across the 12-month period compared with the PDS group; these findings further confirm that NACT/IDS might be a feasible option for patients unsuitable for PDS.

摘要

目的

探讨新辅助化疗(NACT)后行间隔减瘤手术(IDS)与直接行减瘤手术(PDS)相比,对晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者生活质量(QoL)的影响。

设计

在单一机构进行的随机试验。

地点

意大利罗马圣心天主教大学综合医院IRCCS妇科肿瘤学部。

样本

IIIC/IV期EOC且肿瘤负荷高的患者。

方法

患者按1:1随机分组,分别接受PDS(PDS组)或NACT后行IDS(NACT/IDS组)。

主要观察指标

使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)和卵巢癌模块(OV28)评估生活质量(QoL)数据;共同主要结局为12个月时的QLQ-C30总体健康评分(横断面分析)以及治疗组之间QLQ-C30总体健康评分随时间的平均差异(纵向分析)。

结果

2011年10月至2016年5月,共纳入171例患者(PDS组 = 84例;NACT/IDS组 = 87例)。我们观察到,在12个月时,各治疗组在任何生活质量功能量表上均无临床或统计学上的显著差异,包括QLQ-C30总体健康评分(NACT/IDS组与PDS组相比,平均差异为4.7,95%CI为 -4.99至14.4,p = 0.340)。随着时间推移,我们发现接受PDS的患者总体健康评分低于接受NACT的患者(平均评分差异为6.27,95%CI为0.440至12.11,p = 0.035),尽管这在临床上并无实际意义。

结论

我们发现12个月时与治疗方法相关的总体生活质量无差异,尽管NACT/IDS组患者在12个月期间的总体健康评分高于PDS组;这些发现进一步证实,NACT/IDS对于不适合PDS的患者可能是一种可行的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验