• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮层距离对艾宾浩斯错觉和德博夫错觉的影响。

Effects of cortical distance on the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions.

机构信息

School of Optometry & Vision Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Perception. 2023 Jul;52(7):459-483. doi: 10.1177/03010066231175014. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1177/03010066231175014
PMID:37335155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10291393/
Abstract

The Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions affect the perceived size of a target circle depending on the size and proximity of circular inducers or a ring. Converging evidence suggests that these illusions are driven by interactions between contours mediated by their cortical distance in primary visual cortex. We tested the effect of cortical distance on these illusions using two methods: First, we manipulated retinal distance between target and inducers in a two-interval forced choice design, finding that targets appeared larger with a closer surround. Next, we predicted that targets presented peripherally should appear larger due to cortical magnification. Hence, we tested the illusion strength when positioning the stimuli at various eccentricities, with results supporting this hypothesis. We calculated estimated cortical distances between illusion elements in each experiment and used these estimates to compare the relationship between cortical distance and illusion strength across our experiments. In a final experiment, we modified the Delboeuf illusion to test whether the influence of the inducers/annuli in this illusion is influenced by an inhibitory surround. We found evidence that an additional outer ring makes targets appear smaller compared to a single-ring condition, suggesting that near and distal contours have antagonistic effects on perceived target size.

摘要

艾宾浩斯和德尔博夫错觉会影响目标圆的感知大小,具体取决于圆形诱导物或环的大小和接近程度。越来越多的证据表明,这些错觉是由初级视觉皮层中轮廓之间的相互作用驱动的,这些相互作用是由它们的皮质距离介导的。我们使用两种方法来测试皮质距离对这些错觉的影响:首先,我们在两间隔强制选择设计中操纵目标和诱导物之间的视网膜距离,发现目标周围的距离越近,目标看起来就越大。接下来,我们预测由于皮层放大,当目标出现在外周时应该会显得更大。因此,我们在不同的偏心率下测试了刺激的错觉强度,结果支持了这一假设。我们计算了每个实验中错觉元素之间的估计皮质距离,并使用这些估计值来比较我们实验中皮质距离和错觉强度之间的关系。在最后的实验中,我们修改了德尔博夫错觉,以测试这种错觉中诱导物/环的影响是否受到抑制性环绕的影响。我们发现证据表明,与单环条件相比,额外的外环使目标看起来更小,这表明近端和远端轮廓对感知目标大小有拮抗作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/664d1fd68864/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/6ce9d24a6547/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/469137e7ffd8/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/28d069c4f8bf/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/96310b953748/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/d07328bcafdf/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/95efe383c27d/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/664d1fd68864/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/6ce9d24a6547/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/469137e7ffd8/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/28d069c4f8bf/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/96310b953748/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/d07328bcafdf/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/95efe383c27d/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0a7/10291393/664d1fd68864/10.1177_03010066231175014-fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of cortical distance on the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions.皮层距离对艾宾浩斯错觉和德博夫错觉的影响。
Perception. 2023 Jul;52(7):459-483. doi: 10.1177/03010066231175014. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
2
Visual perception in domestic dogs: susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus-Titchener and Delboeuf illusions.家犬的视觉感知:对艾宾浩斯-铁钦纳错觉和德勃夫错觉的易感性。
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):435-448. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1067-1. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
3
Lightness effects in Delboeuf and Ebbinghaus size-contrast illusions.德勃夫和艾宾浩斯大小对比错觉中的明度效应。
Perception. 2011;40(4):464-73. doi: 10.1068/p6622.
4
Dual processes underlie the effect of the Ebbinghaüs illusion on control of grasping.双重过程是艾宾浩斯错觉对抓握控制产生影响的基础。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Nov;47(11):1472-1492. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000819.
5
Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.在受限和非受限观察条件下,蜜蜂对环境大小错觉的感知。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2278.
6
Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but reduces the Müller-Lyer and orientation contrast illusions.动态呈现会增强艾宾浩斯错觉,但会降低缪勒-莱尔错觉和方向对比错觉。
J Vis. 2021 Jun 7;21(6):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.6.4.
7
Opposite effects of motion dynamics on the Ebbinghaus and corridor illusions.运动动力学对艾宾浩斯错觉和走廊错觉的相反影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1912-1927. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01927-w.
8
Can reptiles perceive visual illusions? Delboeuf illusion in red-footed tortoise (Chelonoidis carbonaria) and bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps).爬行动物能感知视觉错觉吗?红腿陆龟(Chelonoidis carbonaria)和鬃狮蜥(Pogona vitticeps)的德勃夫错觉。
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Nov;133(4):419-427. doi: 10.1037/com0000176. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Guppies, Poecilia reticulata, perceive a reversed Delboeuf illusion.孔雀鱼(Poecilia reticulata)会感知到一种颠倒的德勃夫错觉。
Anim Cogn. 2019 May;22(3):291-303. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01237-6. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
The Ebbinghaus illusion in the gray bamboo shark (Chiloscyllium griseum) in comparison to the teleost damselfish (Chromis chromis).灰竹鲨(Chiloscyllium griseum)与硬骨鱼雀鲷(Chromis chromis)相比的艾宾浩斯错觉。
Zoology (Jena). 2017 Aug;123:16-29. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional correlates of atypical visuoperceptual organization in a multisite clinical high-risk sample.多中心临床高危样本中非典型视觉感知组织的功能相关性
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1037/abn0000992.
2
Distinct Contributions of Alpha and Beta Oscillations to Context-Dependent Visual Size Perception.α波和β波振荡对依赖于背景的视觉大小感知的不同贡献。
Neurosci Bull. 2024 Dec;40(12):1875-1885. doi: 10.1007/s12264-024-01257-4. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptual grouping leads to objecthood effects in the Ebbinghaus illusion.知觉分组导致艾宾浩斯错觉中的物体效应。
J Vis. 2020 Aug 3;20(8):11. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.8.11.
2
Learning to see the Ebbinghaus illusion in the periphery reveals a top-down stabilization of size perception across the visual field.学习在外周视觉中观察艾宾浩斯错觉,可以揭示出跨视野的大小感知自上而下的稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 28;10(1):12622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69329-9.
3
On Why Objects Appear Smaller in the Visual Periphery.为什么物体在视觉边缘看起来更小。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;31(1):88-96. doi: 10.1177/0956797619892624. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Binocular Modulation of Monocular V1 Neurons.双眼调制单眼 V1 神经元。
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 4;29(3):381-391.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
5
Low-spatial-frequency bias in context-dependent visual size perception.情境依赖视觉大小感知中的低空间频率偏差
J Vis. 2018 Aug 1;18(8):2. doi: 10.1167/18.8.2.
6
Is the Ebbinghaus illusion a size contrast illusion?艾宾浩斯错觉是一种大小对比错觉吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
The Perceived Size and Shape of Objects in Peripheral Vision.周边视觉中物体的感知大小和形状。
Iperception. 2016 Aug 17;7(4):2041669516661900. doi: 10.1177/2041669516661900. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.
8
Attractive Contours of the Ebbinghaus Illusion.艾宾浩斯错觉的诱人轮廓。
Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Feb;122(1):88-95. doi: 10.1177/0031512515626632. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
9
Cortical idiosyncrasies predict the perception of object size.皮质特质可预测对物体大小的感知。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 30;7:12110. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12110.
10
Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion.量化艾宾浩斯图形效应:目标大小、背景大小和目标与背景的距离决定了错觉的存在和方向。
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 4;6:1679. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01679. eCollection 2015.