College of Nursing, University of Iowa, USA.
School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Oct 19;30(11):1773-1783. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad106.
Improved health among older women remains elusive and may be linked to limited knowledge of and interventions targeted to population subgroups. Use of structured community nurse home visit data exploring relationships between client outcomes, phenotypes, and targeted intervention approaches may reveal new understandings of practice effectiveness.
Omaha System data of 2363 women 65 years and older with circulation problems receiving at least 2 community nurse home visits were accessed. Previously identified phenotypes (Poor circulation; Irregular heart rate; and Limited symptoms), 7 intervention approaches (High-Surveillance; High-Teaching/Guidance/Counseling; Balanced-All; Balanced-Surveillance-Teaching/Guidance/Counseling; Low-Teaching/Guidance/Counseling-Balanced Other; Low-Surveillance-Mostly-Teaching/Guidance/Couseling-TreatmentProcedure-CaseManagement; and Mostly-TreatementProcedure+CaseManagement), and client knowledge, behavior, and status outcomes were used. Client-linked intervention approach counts, proportional use per phenotypes, and associations with client outcome scores were descriptively analyzed. Associations between intervention approach proportional use by phenotype and outcome scores were analyzed using parallel coordinate graph methodology for intervention approach effectiveness.
Percent use of intervention approach differed significantly by phenotype. The 2 most widely employed intervention approaches were characterized by either a high use of surveillance interventions or a balanced use of all intervention categories (surveillance, teaching/guidance/counseling, treatment-procedure, case-management). Mean outcome discharge and change scores significantly differed by intervention approach. Proportionally deployed intervention approach patterns by phenotype were associated with outcome small effects improvement.
The Omaha System taxonomy supported the management and exploration of large multidimensional community nursing data of older women with circulation problems. This study offers a new way to examine intervention effectiveness using phenotype- and targeted intervention approach-informed structured data.
尽管老年女性的健康状况有所改善,但仍难以实现,这可能与对人群亚组的知识有限和干预措施有限有关。利用探索客户结果、表型和目标干预方法之间关系的结构化社区护士家访数据,可以揭示对实践效果的新理解。
访问了 2363 名 65 岁及以上患有循环问题并接受至少 2 次社区护士家访的女性的奥马哈系统数据。先前确定的表型(循环不良;不规则心率;和有限的症状)、7 种干预方法(高监测;高教学/指导/咨询;平衡所有;平衡监测-教学/指导/咨询;低教学/指导/咨询-平衡其他;低监测-主要教学/指导/咨询-治疗程序-病例管理;和主要治疗程序+病例管理)以及客户知识、行为和状况结果。描述性分析了客户相关干预方法计数、按表型的比例使用以及与客户结果评分的相关性。使用平行坐标图方法分析了表型与结果评分的干预方法比例使用之间的相关性,以评估干预方法的效果。
干预方法的使用百分比因表型而异。使用最广泛的两种干预方法的特点是监测干预的使用量高或所有干预类别的使用量平衡(监测、教学/指导/咨询、治疗程序、病例管理)。出院和变化的平均结果评分差异显著。表型的比例部署干预方法模式与结果的小效果改善相关。
奥马哈系统分类法支持对患有循环问题的老年女性的大型多维社区护理数据的管理和探索。本研究提供了一种使用基于表型和目标干预方法的结构化数据检查干预效果的新方法。