Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EA Cambridge, UK.
Institute of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna 4031, Philippines.
Plant Physiol. 2023 Sep 22;193(2):1073-1090. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad355.
Despite the global importance of species with C4 photosynthesis, there is a lack of consensus regarding C4 performance under fluctuating light. Contrasting hypotheses and experimental evidence suggest that C4 photosynthesis is either less or more efficient in fixing carbon under fluctuating light than the ancestral C3 form. Two main issues have been identified that may underly the lack of consensus: neglect of evolutionary distance between selected C3 and C4 species and use of contrasting fluctuating light treatments. To circumvent these issues, we measured photosynthetic responses to fluctuating light across 3 independent phylogenetically controlled comparisons between C3 and C4 species from Alloteropsis, Flaveria, and Cleome genera under 21% and 2% O2. Leaves were subjected to repetitive stepwise changes in light intensity (800 and 100 µmol m-2 s-1 photon flux density) with 3 contrasting durations: 6, 30, and 300 s. These experiments reconciled the opposing results found across previous studies and showed that (i) stimulation of CO2 assimilation in C4 species during the low-light phase was both stronger and more sustained than in C3 species; (ii) CO2 assimilation patterns during the high-light phase could be attributable to species or C4 subtype differences rather than photosynthetic pathway; and (iii) the duration of each light step in the fluctuation regime can strongly influence experimental outcomes.
尽管具有 C4 光合作用的物种具有全球重要性,但对于波动光下的 C4 性能仍缺乏共识。对比假说和实验证据表明,与祖先的 C3 形式相比,C4 光合作用在波动光下固定碳的效率要么更低,要么更高。有两个主要问题可能是导致缺乏共识的原因:忽略了所选 C3 和 C4 物种之间的进化距离,以及使用了对比鲜明的波动光处理。为了解决这些问题,我们在 21%和 2%O2 下,通过 3 个独立的基于系统发育控制的比较,在 Alloteropsis、Flaveria 和 Cleome 属的 C3 和 C4 物种之间,测量了对波动光的光合响应。叶片受到重复的逐步变化的光强(800 和 100 µmol m-2 s-1 光子通量密度)的影响,具有 3 个不同的持续时间:6、30 和 300 s。这些实验调和了以往研究中发现的相反结果,并表明:(i)在低光阶段,C4 物种中 CO2 同化的刺激作用既比 C3 物种更强,也更持久;(ii)高光阶段的 CO2 同化模式可以归因于物种或 C4 亚型的差异,而不是光合作用途径;(iii)波动光系统中每个光步的持续时间会强烈影响实验结果。