College of Medicine, The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Aug;231:107836. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107836. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
For chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), bedside subdural drains (SDD) provide a useful alternative to more invasive neurosurgical techniques, including evacuation through multiple burr holes or formal craniotomy. However, no scale currently exists adequately predicting SDD candidacy or treatment response. The present study sought to characterize predictors of revision surgery after initial treatment with bedside SDD for cSDH.
We conducted a retrospective case control study of cSDH patients treated with bedside SDD at a level one trauma center between 2018 and 2022. Binomial regression was used to compare SDD patients and generate odds ratios associated with revision surgery, which were compared using a binary random effects model.
Ninety six cSDH patients were included, of whom 13 (13.5%) required a revision surgery after initial treatment failure with bedside SDD. Patients requiring revision surgery demonstrated an increased male predominance (84.6% vs. 69.9% of SDD patients not requiring revision surgery), tended to be younger (67.8 vs. 70.5 years) with a greater body mass index (28.7 vs. 25.6 kg/m), and have a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on presentation of 12.5 (versus 14). Patients with an initial GCS score less than 13 (OR 11.0 95% CI 2.8 - 43.3), midline shift greater than 10 mm on CT (OR 6.5 95% CI 1.7 - 25.7), or duration of SDD placement longer than 3 days (OR 10.5 95% CI 2.6 - 41.9) demonstrated a greater likelihood of needing a revision surgery after initial treatment with bedside SDD.
Among patients treated with SDD, we identified 3 independent factors predicting the need for revision surgery: GCS score, midline shift, and duration of drain placement. Craniotomy may be favored over bedside SDD in patients presenting with a GCS score less than 13 or midline shift greater than 10 mm and for SDD patients demonstrating inadequate clinical response after 3 days.
对于慢性硬脑膜下血肿(cSDH),床边引流术(SDD)为一种比开颅钻孔术或开颅术等更具侵入性的神经外科技术更为有效的替代方案。然而,目前还没有一种充分的评分系统可以准确预测 SDD 的适应证或治疗反应。本研究旨在探讨影响初始床边 SDD 治疗后 cSDH 患者行翻修手术的因素。
我们对 2018 年至 2022 年在一家一级创伤中心接受床边 SDD 治疗的 cSDH 患者进行了回顾性病例对照研究。采用二项式回归比较 SDD 患者,并生成与翻修手术相关的比值比,然后使用二项随机效应模型进行比较。
共纳入 96 例 cSDH 患者,其中 13 例(13.5%)在初始床边 SDD 治疗失败后需要行翻修手术。需要行翻修手术的患者中男性比例较高(84.6%比 SDD 患者中未行翻修手术的患者 69.9%),年龄较轻(67.8 岁比 70.5 岁),体重指数较大(28.7 千克/平方米比 25.6 千克/平方米),入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分较低(12.5 分比 14 分)。入院时 GCS 评分<13(比值比 11.0,95%可信区间 2.8-43.3)、CT 示中线移位>10 毫米(比值比 6.5,95%可信区间 1.7-25.7)或 SDD 放置时间超过 3 天(比值比 10.5,95%可信区间 2.6-41.9)的患者,初始床边 SDD 治疗后更有可能需要行翻修手术。
在接受 SDD 治疗的患者中,我们确定了 3 个独立的因素可预测翻修手术的需要:GCS 评分、中线移位和引流放置时间。对于入院时 GCS 评分<13 或中线移位>10 毫米的患者,或 SDD 治疗 3 天后临床反应不佳的患者,开颅术可能优于床边 SDD。