Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Chronic and Non-chronic Total Occlusions: A Meta-analysis of 690,123 Patients.

The use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) is still a subject of debate, with conflicting outcomes reported in different studies when compared to non-CTO lesions. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the clinical outcomes of PCI in CTO cases compared to non-CTO lesions, both in the short and long-term. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane Central were searched until March 2023 for relevant studies addressing short- and long-term outcomes of PCI in CTO vs non-CTO lesions. Dichotomous data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random Der-Simonian lair effect model using STATA 17 MP. Eight studies with a total of 690,123 patients were included. In terms of short-term outcomes, CTO PCI was associated with higher rates of vessel perforation (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.31-3.57) and cardiac tamponade (OR = 5.19, 95% CI: 4.29-6.28). Additionally, CTO PCI showed lower rates of procedural success (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96). Moreover, in the long-term, CTO PCI had higher rates of MACE (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), however, it showed lower rates of cardiac death (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38-0.98), with no significant difference in other reported outcomes. Our findings underscore the challenges and adverse outcomes associated with using PCI to treat CTO lesions in the short term. This suggests that interventional cardiologists should carefully evaluate the risks and benefits before proceeding with PCI in CTO lesions.