Center for Cancer Prevention and Research, Uberlandia Cancer Hospital, Av Amazonas nº 1996, Umuarama, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, CEP: 38.405‑302, Brazil.
Laboratory of Tumor Biomarkers and Osteoimmunology, Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av Pará nº 1720, Bloco 6T, Room 07, Umuarama, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, CEP: 38.405‑320, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37204-y.
Surgery is not used as a criterion for staging prostate cancer, although there is evidence that the number of analyzed and affected lymph nodes have prognosis value. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are significant differences in staging criteria in patients who underwent prostatectomy compared to those who did not, and whether the number of affected and analyzed lymph nodes (LN) plays a prognostic role. In this retrospective study, a test cohort consisting of 404,210 newly diagnosed men with prostate cancer, between 2004 and 2010, was obtained from the 17 registries (Nov 2021 submission); a validation consisting of 147,719 newly diagnosed men with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2019 was obtained from the 8 registries (Nov 2021 submission). Prostate cancer-specific survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves, survival tables and Cox regression; overall survival was analyzed only to compare Harrell's C-index between different staging criteria. In initial analyses, it was observed that the prognostic value of lymph node metastasis changes according to the type of staging (clinical or pathological), which is linked to the surgical approach (prostatectomy). Compared with T4/N0/M0 patients, which are also classified as stage IVA, N1/M0 patients had a shorter [adjusted HR: 1.767 (1429-2184), p < 0.0005] and a longer [adjusted HR: 0.832 (0.740-0.935), p = 0.002] specific survival when submitted to prostatectomy or not, respectively. Analyzing separately the patients who were submitted to prostatectomy and those who were not, it was possible to obtain new LN metastasis classifications (N1: 1 + LN; N2: 2 + LNs; N3: > 2 + LNs). This new (pathological) classification of N allowed the reclassification of patients based on T and Gleason grade groups, mainly those with T3 and T4 disease. In the validation group, this new staging criterion was proven to be superior [specific survival C-index: 0.908 (0.906-0.911); overall survival C-index: 0.788 (0.786-0.791)] compared to that currently used by the AJCC [8th edition; specific survival C-index: 0.892 (0.889-0.895); overall survival C-index: 0.744 (0.741-0.747)]. In addition, an adequate number of dissected lymph nodes results in a 39% reduction in death risk [adjusted HR: 0.610 (0.498-0.747), p < 0.0005]. As main conclusion, the surgery has a major impact on prostate cancer staging, mainly modifying the effect of N on survival, and enabling the stratification of pathological N according to the number of affected LN. Such a factor, when considered as staging criteria, improves the prognosis classification.
手术不作为前列腺癌分期的标准,尽管有证据表明分析和受影响的淋巴结数量具有预后价值。本研究的目的是确定在接受前列腺切除术的患者与未接受前列腺切除术的患者之间,分期标准是否存在显著差异,以及受影响和分析的淋巴结 (LN) 数量是否具有预后作用。在这项回顾性研究中,从 17 个登记处(2021 年 11 月提交)获得了 404,210 名新诊断为前列腺癌的男性的测试队列(2004 年至 2010 年);从 8 个登记处(2021 年 11 月提交)获得了 147,719 名新诊断为前列腺癌的男性验证队列(2004 年至 2019 年)。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线、生存表和 Cox 回归分析前列腺癌特异性生存;仅为了比较不同分期标准之间 Harrell 的 C 指数而分析总生存。在初步分析中,观察到淋巴结转移的预后价值根据分期类型(临床或病理)而变化,这与手术方法(前列腺切除术)有关。与 T4/N0/M0 患者相比,这些患者也被归类为 IVA 期,N1/M0 患者在接受或不接受前列腺切除术时的特异性生存时间更短 [调整后的 HR:1.767(1429-2184),p<0.0005] 和更长 [调整后的 HR:0.832(0.740-0.935),p=0.002]。分别分析接受前列腺切除术和未接受前列腺切除术的患者,就有可能获得新的 LN 转移分类(N1:1+LN;N2:2+LNs;N3:>2+LNs)。这种新的(病理)N 分类允许根据 T 和 Gleason 分级组对患者进行重新分类,主要是 T3 和 T4 疾病患者。在验证组中,与目前 AJCC(第 8 版)使用的标准相比,这一新的分期标准被证明更优越 [特异性生存 C 指数:0.908(0.906-0.911);总生存 C 指数:0.788(0.786-0.791)]。此外,充分的淋巴结切除数量可将死亡风险降低 39%[调整后的 HR:0.610(0.498-0.747),p<0.0005]。作为主要结论,手术对前列腺癌分期有重大影响,主要是改变 N 对生存的影响,并能够根据受影响的淋巴结数量对病理 N 进行分层。当考虑作为分期标准时,这样的因素可以改善预后分类。