• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌分期手术入路分析:监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的结果。

Analysis of the surgical approach in prostate cancer staging: results from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program.

机构信息

Center for Cancer Prevention and Research, Uberlandia Cancer Hospital, Av Amazonas nº 1996, Umuarama, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, CEP: 38.405‑302, Brazil.

Laboratory of Tumor Biomarkers and Osteoimmunology, Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av Pará nº 1720, Bloco 6T, Room 07, Umuarama, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, CEP: 38.405‑320, Brazil.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37204-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37204-y
PMID:37336940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10279689/
Abstract

Surgery is not used as a criterion for staging prostate cancer, although there is evidence that the number of analyzed and affected lymph nodes have prognosis value. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are significant differences in staging criteria in patients who underwent prostatectomy compared to those who did not, and whether the number of affected and analyzed lymph nodes (LN) plays a prognostic role. In this retrospective study, a test cohort consisting of 404,210 newly diagnosed men with prostate cancer, between 2004 and 2010, was obtained from the 17 registries (Nov 2021 submission); a validation consisting of 147,719 newly diagnosed men with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2019 was obtained from the 8 registries (Nov 2021 submission). Prostate cancer-specific survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves, survival tables and Cox regression; overall survival was analyzed only to compare Harrell's C-index between different staging criteria. In initial analyses, it was observed that the prognostic value of lymph node metastasis changes according to the type of staging (clinical or pathological), which is linked to the surgical approach (prostatectomy). Compared with T4/N0/M0 patients, which are also classified as stage IVA, N1/M0 patients had a shorter [adjusted HR: 1.767 (1429-2184), p < 0.0005] and a longer [adjusted HR: 0.832 (0.740-0.935), p = 0.002] specific survival when submitted to prostatectomy or not, respectively. Analyzing separately the patients who were submitted to prostatectomy and those who were not, it was possible to obtain new LN metastasis classifications (N1: 1 + LN; N2: 2 + LNs; N3: > 2 + LNs). This new (pathological) classification of N allowed the reclassification of patients based on T and Gleason grade groups, mainly those with T3 and T4 disease. In the validation group, this new staging criterion was proven to be superior [specific survival C-index: 0.908 (0.906-0.911); overall survival C-index: 0.788 (0.786-0.791)] compared to that currently used by the AJCC [8th edition; specific survival C-index: 0.892 (0.889-0.895); overall survival C-index: 0.744 (0.741-0.747)]. In addition, an adequate number of dissected lymph nodes results in a 39% reduction in death risk [adjusted HR: 0.610 (0.498-0.747), p < 0.0005]. As main conclusion, the surgery has a major impact on prostate cancer staging, mainly modifying the effect of N on survival, and enabling the stratification of pathological N according to the number of affected LN. Such a factor, when considered as staging criteria, improves the prognosis classification.

摘要

手术不作为前列腺癌分期的标准,尽管有证据表明分析和受影响的淋巴结数量具有预后价值。本研究的目的是确定在接受前列腺切除术的患者与未接受前列腺切除术的患者之间,分期标准是否存在显著差异,以及受影响和分析的淋巴结 (LN) 数量是否具有预后作用。在这项回顾性研究中,从 17 个登记处(2021 年 11 月提交)获得了 404,210 名新诊断为前列腺癌的男性的测试队列(2004 年至 2010 年);从 8 个登记处(2021 年 11 月提交)获得了 147,719 名新诊断为前列腺癌的男性验证队列(2004 年至 2019 年)。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线、生存表和 Cox 回归分析前列腺癌特异性生存;仅为了比较不同分期标准之间 Harrell 的 C 指数而分析总生存。在初步分析中,观察到淋巴结转移的预后价值根据分期类型(临床或病理)而变化,这与手术方法(前列腺切除术)有关。与 T4/N0/M0 患者相比,这些患者也被归类为 IVA 期,N1/M0 患者在接受或不接受前列腺切除术时的特异性生存时间更短 [调整后的 HR:1.767(1429-2184),p<0.0005] 和更长 [调整后的 HR:0.832(0.740-0.935),p=0.002]。分别分析接受前列腺切除术和未接受前列腺切除术的患者,就有可能获得新的 LN 转移分类(N1:1+LN;N2:2+LNs;N3:>2+LNs)。这种新的(病理)N 分类允许根据 T 和 Gleason 分级组对患者进行重新分类,主要是 T3 和 T4 疾病患者。在验证组中,与目前 AJCC(第 8 版)使用的标准相比,这一新的分期标准被证明更优越 [特异性生存 C 指数:0.908(0.906-0.911);总生存 C 指数:0.788(0.786-0.791)]。此外,充分的淋巴结切除数量可将死亡风险降低 39%[调整后的 HR:0.610(0.498-0.747),p<0.0005]。作为主要结论,手术对前列腺癌分期有重大影响,主要是改变 N 对生存的影响,并能够根据受影响的淋巴结数量对病理 N 进行分层。当考虑作为分期标准时,这样的因素可以改善预后分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/938d/10279689/f29b0f626a28/41598_2023_37204_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/938d/10279689/1a82249c91e4/41598_2023_37204_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/938d/10279689/f29b0f626a28/41598_2023_37204_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/938d/10279689/1a82249c91e4/41598_2023_37204_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/938d/10279689/f29b0f626a28/41598_2023_37204_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the surgical approach in prostate cancer staging: results from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program.前列腺癌分期手术入路分析:监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的结果。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37204-y.
2
Development and Validation of an Improved Pathological Nodal Staging System in Men with Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌男性患者改良病理淋巴结分期系统的开发与验证
J Urol. 2022 Mar;207(3):581-591. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002256. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
Adequate lymph node dissection is essential for accurate nodal staging in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based study.肝内胆管癌准确的淋巴结分期需要充分的淋巴结清扫: 一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):8184-8198. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5620. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy.对于淋巴结阳性的前列腺癌患者,两个阳性淋巴结代表癌症特异性生存的显著临界值。一项基于两家机构对703例接受根治性前列腺切除术、扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术和辅助治疗的连续N+患者的经验提出的新建议。
Eur Urol. 2009 Feb;55(2):261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.043. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.国际口咽癌协作网(ICON-S)制定和验证 HPV 相关口咽癌分期系统:一项多中心队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):440-451. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00560-4. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Validation study on the 2 mm diameter cutoff in lymph node-positive cases following radical prostatectomy in accordance with the AJCC/UICC TNM 8th edition: Real-world data analysis from a Japanese cohort.根据 AJCC/UICC TNM 第 8 版,对根治性前列腺切除术后淋巴结阳性病例中 2mm 直径截断的验证研究:来自日本队列的真实世界数据分析。
Int J Urol. 2024 Jun;31(6):662-669. doi: 10.1111/iju.15434. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.根治性前列腺切除术改善了 PSA 时代淋巴结阳性前列腺癌男性的无进展生存期和癌症特异性生存期:一项确认性研究。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09730.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
8
Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.胃癌的拓扑淋巴结分期系统优于第 8 版 AJCC TNM 分期系统,具有更好的预后预测价值。一项西方单中心经验。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;34:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 May 16.
9
Differing risk of cancer death among patients with lymph node metastasis after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: identification of risk categories according to number of positive nodes and Gleason score.根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术后淋巴结转移患者的癌症死亡风险不同:根据阳性淋巴结数和 Gleason 评分确定风险类别。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(8):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11602.x. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
10
A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.一种将病理检查淋巴结有限和足够数量的晚期胃癌患者进行分类的均一化方法。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Jun 10;39(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0370-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary Analysis of PSA and BCR-Free Survival in Asian Prostate Cancer Patients.亚洲前列腺癌患者前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及无生化复发生存的二次分析
Cancer Manag Res. 2025 Jun 24;17:1205-1214. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S527092. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical Tools for Optimizing Therapeutic Decision-Making in Prostate Cancer: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.优化前列腺癌治疗决策的临床工具:一项五年回顾性分析
Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;14(7):838. doi: 10.3390/life14070838.

本文引用的文献

1
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2023.NCCN 指南®洞察:前列腺癌,第 1.2023 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Dec;20(12):1288-1298. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0063.
2
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline.临床局限性前列腺癌:美国泌尿外科学会/美国放射肿瘤学会指南
J Urol. 2022 Sep;208(3):505-507. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002854. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part I: Introduction, Risk Assessment, Staging, and Risk-Based Management.临床局限性前列腺癌:AUA/ASTRO 指南,第 I 部分:介绍、风险评估、分期和基于风险的管理。
J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-18. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002757. Epub 2022 May 10.
4
Development and Validation of an Improved Pathological Nodal Staging System in Men with Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌男性患者改良病理淋巴结分期系统的开发与验证
J Urol. 2022 Mar;207(3):581-591. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002256. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
5
On the probability of lymph node negativity in pN0-staged prostate cancer-a theoretically derived rule of thumb for adjuvant needs.在 pN0 期前列腺癌中淋巴结阴性的概率——辅助治疗需求的理论推导经验法则。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2022 Aug;198(8):690-699. doi: 10.1007/s00066-021-01841-x. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
The Establishment of New Thresholds for PLND-Validated Clinical Nomograms to Predict Non-Regional Lymph Node Metastases: Using Ga-PSMA PET/CT as References.建立经盆腔淋巴结清扫术验证的临床列线图新阈值以预测非区域淋巴结转移:以镓-PSMA PET/CT为参考
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 15;11:658669. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.658669. eCollection 2021.
7
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021.NCCN 指南解读:前列腺癌,第 1.2021 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Feb 2;19(2):134-143. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008.
8
Extended Versus Limited Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: Early Oncological Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.根治性前列腺切除术治疗中高危前列腺癌时广泛与局限性盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较:一项随机 3 期试验的早期肿瘤学结局。
Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):595-604. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.040. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
9
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2020 版更新。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
10
Development and Validation of a Clinical Prognostic Stage Group System for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Using Disease-Specific Mortality Results From the International Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate.国际前列腺癌分期协作组基于疾病特异性死亡率数据制定和验证非转移性前列腺癌临床预后分期系统。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;6(12):1912-1920. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4922.