Suppr超能文献

拟管模型(qPipe)的叶面积和叶质量估计的异速生长,应用于植物功能型。

Allometry of the quasi-pipe (qPipe) model for estimating tree leaf area and tree leaf mass applied to plant functional types.

机构信息

Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, 1-5 Shimogamohangi, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8522, Japan.

Shikoku Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 2-915 Asakuranishi, Kochi, 780-8077, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37112-1.

Abstract

The allometry of the pipe model quantifies the approximate proportionality between the tree leaf amount and the stem cross-sectional area at the crown base (A). It is useful for estimating and modeling carbon fixation abilities of trees but requires climbing the tree and is thus unsuitable for large-scale studies. Here, we adopted a previously proposed allometry (hereafter the quasi-pipe (qPipe) model allometry) formulating the relationship between the tree leaf amount and a surrogate of A, A, calculated from tree dimensions measurable from the ground. Using published/unpublished data for 962 trees of 159 species collected between tropical rainforests and boreal forests, we established pipe and qPipe model allometries for evergreen-conifer, deciduous-conifer, evergreen-broadleaf, and deciduous-broadleaf plant functional types (PFTs). For the leaf area per tree (LA), allometric lines on a log-log plane were almost identical among the four PFTs in both models, with slopes of ~ 1. For the leaf mass per tree (LM), however, the allometric lines separated among the four PFTs in both models and had slopes greater than 1, indicating that the proportionality assumed in the pipe model held for LA but not LM. The applicability of the qPipe model in estimating the stand-scale leaf amount was further examined.

摘要

管型比的量化方法,是对树冠基部的树木叶量和树干横截面积(A)之间的近似比例关系进行量化。这种方法对于估计和模拟树木的碳固定能力很有用,但需要爬树,因此不适合大规模研究。在这里,我们采用了一种之前提出的管型比量化方法(简称拟管(qPipe)模型比量化方法),该方法将树木叶量与从地面可测量的树木尺寸得出的 A 的替代值(A)联系起来。我们利用已发表和未发表的数据,对在热带雨林和北方森林之间收集的 962 株 159 个树种的树木进行分析,建立了常绿针叶树、落叶针叶树、常绿阔叶树和落叶阔叶树功能型(PFT)的管型和 qPipe 模型比量化方法。对于每棵树的叶面积(LA),在这两种模型中,四个 PFT 之间的对数-对数平面上的比量化线几乎相同,斜率约为 1。然而,对于每棵树的叶质量(LM),两种模型中四个 PFT 之间的比量化线是分开的,斜率大于 1,这表明管型比量化方法在 LA 上假设的比例关系成立,但在 LM 上不成立。我们还进一步检验了 qPipe 模型在估计林分尺度叶量方面的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/941d/10279641/6980bcd2ae36/41598_2023_37112_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验