• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动卒中单元管理的伴发残疾患者的结局:BEST-MSU 研究的亚分析。

Outcomes of patients with pre-existing disability managed by mobile stroke units: A sub-analysis of the BEST-MSU study.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, County Emergency Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2023 Dec;18(10):1209-1218. doi: 10.1177/17474930231185471. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1177/17474930231185471
PMID:37337357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few data exist on acute stroke treatment in patients with pre-existing disability (PD) since they are usually excluded from clinical trials. A recent trial of mobile stroke units (MSUs) demonstrated faster treatment and improved outcomes, and included PD patients.

AIM

To determine outcomes with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and benefit of MSU versus management by emergency medical services (EMS), for PD patients.

METHODS

Primary outcomes were utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS). Linear and logistic regression models compared outcomes in patients with versus without PD, and PD patients treated by MSU versus standard management by EMS. Time metrics, safety, quality of life, and health-care utilization were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 1047 tPA-eligible ischemic stroke patients, 254 were with PD (baseline mRS 2-5) and 793 were without PD (baseline mRS 0-1). Although PD patients had worse 90-day uw-mRS, higher mortality, more health-care utilization, and worse quality of life than non-disabled patients, 53% returned to at least their baseline mRS, those treated faster had better outcome, and there was no increased bleeding risk. Comparing PD patients treated by MSU versus EMS, 90-day uw-mRS was 0.42 versus 0.36 (p = 0.07) and 57% versus 46% returned to at least their baseline mRS. There was no interaction between disability status and MSU versus EMS group assignment (p = 0.67) for 90-day uw-mRS.

CONCLUSION

PD did not prevent the benefit of faster treatment with tPA in the BEST-MSU study. Our data support inclusion of PD patients in the MSU management paradigm.

摘要

背景

由于预先存在残疾(PD)的患者通常被排除在临床试验之外,因此针对这些患者的急性中风治疗的数据很少。最近一项关于移动卒中单元(MSU)的试验表明,MSU 可加快治疗速度并改善预后,且纳入了 PD 患者。

目的

确定组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)治疗 PD 患者的疗效,以及 MSU 与急诊医疗服务(EMS)管理之间的差异。

方法

主要结局指标为效用加权改良 Rankin 量表(uw-mRS)评分。线性和逻辑回归模型比较了 PD 患者与非 PD 患者、MSU 治疗的 PD 患者与标准 EMS 管理的 PD 患者之间的结局。比较了时间指标、安全性、生活质量和医疗保健利用率。

结果

在 1047 名符合 tPA 治疗条件的缺血性卒中患者中,254 名患者存在 PD(基线 mRS 2-5),793 名患者无 PD(基线 mRS 0-1)。尽管 PD 患者 90 天 uw-mRS 评分较差、死亡率较高、医疗保健利用率较高、生活质量较差,但仍有 53%的患者恢复到基线 mRS 水平以上,治疗速度较快的患者预后较好,且出血风险并未增加。与 EMS 相比,MSU 治疗的 PD 患者 90 天 uw-mRS 评分分别为 0.42 分和 0.36 分(p=0.07),57%的患者恢复到基线 mRS 水平以上,46%的患者恢复到基线 mRS 水平以上。残疾状况和 MSU 与 EMS 分组之间无交互作用(p=0.67)。

结论

在 BEST-MSU 研究中,PD 并未阻止 PD 患者更快接受 tPA 治疗带来的获益。我们的数据支持将 PD 患者纳入 MSU 管理模式。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of patients with pre-existing disability managed by mobile stroke units: A sub-analysis of the BEST-MSU study.移动卒中单元管理的伴发残疾患者的结局:BEST-MSU 研究的亚分析。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Dec;18(10):1209-1218. doi: 10.1177/17474930231185471. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
Mobile Stroke Unit Management in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis.适用于静脉溶栓的急性缺血性卒中患者的移动卒中单元管理
JAMA Neurol. 2024 Dec 1;81(12):1250-1262. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.3659.
3
Modelling the potential clinical benefit of mobile stroke units in England.模拟移动卒中单元在英国的潜在临床益处。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01242-8.
4
Association of Mobile Stroke Unit Care and Spending, Utilization, and Death in New York City.纽约市移动卒中单元护理与支出、利用情况及死亡的关联
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 21;14(2):e036784. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036784. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.
7
Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术联合与不联合静脉溶栓治疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):CD015721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015721.pub2.
8
Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry study.移动卒中治疗单元院前溶栓与常规治疗的功能结局比较:观察性登记研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1035-43. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30129-6. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
9
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
10
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29;2014(7):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.pub3.