Impact of baseline pool impedance on lesion metrics and steam pops in catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the impact of blood-pool local impedance (LI) on lesion characteristics and the incidence of steam pops.

METHODS

Radiofrequency applications at a range of powers (30, 40, and 50 W), contact forces (CF) (5, 15, and 25 g), and durations (15, 30, 45, and 120 s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientation were performed in 40 excised porcine preparations, using a catheter capable of monitoring LI (StablePoint©, Boston Scientific). To simulate the variability in blood-pool impedance, the saline-pool LI was modulated by calibrating saline concentrations. Lesion characteristics were compared under three values of saline-pool LI: 120, 160, and 200 Ω.

RESULTS

Of 648 lesions created, steam pops occurred in 175 (27.0%). When power, CF, time, and catheter orientation were adjusted, ablation at a saline-pool impedance of 160 or 200 Ω more than doubled the risk of steam pops compared with a saline-pool impedance of 120 Ω (Odds ratio = 2.31; p = .0002). Lesions in a saline-pool impedance of 120 Ω were significantly larger in surface area (50 [38-62], 45 [34-56], and 41 [34-60] mm for 120, 160, and 200 Ω, p < .05), but shallower in depth (4.0 [3-5], 4.4 [3.2-5.3], and 4.5 [3.8-5.5] mmfor 120, 160, and 200 Ω, respectively, p < .05) compared with the other two settings. The correlation between the absolute LI-drop and lesion size weakened as the saline-pool LI became higher (e.g., 120 Ω group (r  = .30, r  = .18, and r  = .16, respectively for 120, 160, and 200 Ω), but the usage of %LI-drop (= absolute LI-drop/initial LI) instead of absolute LI-drop may minimize this effect.

CONCLUSIONS

In an experimental model, baseline saline-pool impedance significantly affects the lesion metrics and the risk of steam pops.