• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基线池阻抗对导管消融中病灶指标和蒸汽爆裂的影响。

Impact of baseline pool impedance on lesion metrics and steam pops in catheter ablation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;34(8):1671-1680. doi: 10.1111/jce.15964. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1111/jce.15964
PMID:37337433
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the impact of blood-pool local impedance (LI) on lesion characteristics and the incidence of steam pops.

METHODS

Radiofrequency applications at a range of powers (30, 40, and 50 W), contact forces (CF) (5, 15, and 25 g), and durations (15, 30, 45, and 120 s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientation were performed in 40 excised porcine preparations, using a catheter capable of monitoring LI (StablePoint©, Boston Scientific). To simulate the variability in blood-pool impedance, the saline-pool LI was modulated by calibrating saline concentrations. Lesion characteristics were compared under three values of saline-pool LI: 120, 160, and 200 Ω.

RESULTS

Of 648 lesions created, steam pops occurred in 175 (27.0%). When power, CF, time, and catheter orientation were adjusted, ablation at a saline-pool impedance of 160 or 200 Ω more than doubled the risk of steam pops compared with a saline-pool impedance of 120 Ω (Odds ratio = 2.31; p = .0002). Lesions in a saline-pool impedance of 120 Ω were significantly larger in surface area (50 [38-62], 45 [34-56], and 41 [34-60] mm for 120, 160, and 200 Ω, p < .05), but shallower in depth (4.0 [3-5], 4.4 [3.2-5.3], and 4.5 [3.8-5.5] mmfor 120, 160, and 200 Ω, respectively, p < .05) compared with the other two settings. The correlation between the absolute LI-drop and lesion size weakened as the saline-pool LI became higher (e.g., 120 Ω group (r  = .30, r  = .18, and r  = .16, respectively for 120, 160, and 200 Ω), but the usage of %LI-drop (= absolute LI-drop/initial LI) instead of absolute LI-drop may minimize this effect.

CONCLUSIONS

In an experimental model, baseline saline-pool impedance significantly affects the lesion metrics and the risk of steam pops.

摘要

简介

关于血池局部阻抗(LI)对病变特征和蒸汽 pops 发生率的影响知之甚少。

方法

使用可监测 LI(StablePoint©,Boston Scientific)的导管,在 40 个离体猪制剂中进行功率(30、40 和 50W)、接触力(CF)(5、15 和 25g)和持续时间(15、30、45 和 120s)范围的射频应用,采用垂直/平行导管方向。为了模拟血池阻抗的可变性,通过校准盐水浓度来调制盐水池 LI。在三种盐水池 LI 值(120、160 和 200Ω)下比较病变特征。

结果

在创建的 648 个病变中,发生了 175 个蒸汽 pops(27.0%)。当调整功率、CF、时间和导管方向时,与 120Ω盐水池阻抗相比,160 或 200Ω盐水池阻抗的消融使蒸汽 pops 的风险增加了一倍以上(优势比=2.31;p=0.0002)。在 120Ω盐水池阻抗下,病变的面积明显更大(50[38-62]、45[34-56]和 41[34-60]mm 分别为 120、160 和 200Ω,p<0.05),但深度较浅(4.0[3-5]、4.4[3.2-5.3]和 4.5[3.8-5.5]mm 分别为 120、160 和 200Ω,p<0.05)与其他两个设置相比。随着盐水池 LI 的升高,绝对 LI 下降与病变大小之间的相关性减弱(例如,在 120Ω 组中(r=0.30、r=0.18 和 r=0.16,分别为 120、160 和 200Ω),但使用 %LI 下降(=绝对 LI 下降/初始 LI)代替绝对 LI 下降可能会最小化这种影响。

结论

在实验模型中,基础盐水池阻抗显着影响病变指标和蒸汽 pops 的风险。

相似文献

1
Impact of baseline pool impedance on lesion metrics and steam pops in catheter ablation.基线池阻抗对导管消融中病灶指标和蒸汽爆裂的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;34(8):1671-1680. doi: 10.1111/jce.15964. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
2
Comparison of two catheters measuring local impedance: local impedance variation vs lesion characteristics and steam pops.两种测量局部阻抗导管的比较:局部阻抗变化与病变特征和蒸汽爆裂的比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Nov;65(2):419-428. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01214-z. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
3
Characteristics and optimal ablation settings of a novel, contact-force sensing and local impedance-enabled catheter in an ex vivo perfused swine ventricle model.一种新型的、具备接触力传感和局部阻抗功能的导管在离体灌注猪心室模型中的特性及最佳消融设置
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;32(12):3187-3194. doi: 10.1111/jce.15253. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
4
The optimal ablation setting for a local impedance guided catheter in an in vitro experimental model.体外实验模型中局部阻抗引导导管的最佳消融设置。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;32(8):2069-2076. doi: 10.1111/jce.15136. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
5
Impact of a formula combining local impedance and conventional parameters on lesion size prediction.局部阻抗与传统参数相结合的公式对病变大小预测的影响。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;63(2):389-398. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01013-y. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
Clinical implications of local impedance measurement using the IntellaNav MiFi OI ablation catheter: an ex vivo study.使用IntellaNav MiFi OI消融导管进行局部阻抗测量的临床意义:一项体外研究。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;63(1):185-195. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00954-8. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
7
Novel Measure of Local Impedance Predicts Catheter-Tissue Contact and Lesion Formation.新型局部阻抗测量方法可预测导管-组织接触和病变形成。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;11(4):e005831. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005831.
8
Safety verification of a novel irrigation catheter with flexible tip of laser-cut kerfs and contact force sensor.新型具有激光切割狭缝的柔性尖端和接触力传感器的灌洗导管的安全性验证。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1536-1545. doi: 10.1111/pace.14868. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
9
The influence of electrode-tissue-coverage on RF lesion formation and local impedance: Insights from an ex vivo model.电极-组织覆盖对射频损伤形成和局部阻抗的影响:来自离体模型的见解
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Oct;46(10):1170-1181. doi: 10.1111/pace.14807. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
10
Effect of Baseline Impedance in Radiofrequency Delivery on Lesion Characteristics and the Relationship Between Impedance and Steam Pops.射频消融时基线阻抗对损伤特征的影响以及阻抗与蒸汽泡之间的关系
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 27;9:872961. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.872961. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of baseline-pool local impedance on lesion formation using a local impedance-sensing catheter: Lessons from a porcine experimental model.使用局部阻抗传感导管时基线池局部阻抗对病变形成的影响:来自猪实验模型的经验教训。
J Arrhythm. 2025 Feb 13;41(1):e70016. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70016. eCollection 2025 Feb.