Department of Cardiology, Kimitsu Central Hospital, Kisarazu, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;34(8):1630-1639. doi: 10.1111/jce.15977. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
Ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) is expected to be an adjunctive therapy for mitral isthmus (MI) ablation. Additionally, EIVOM can widely ablate the epicardium via the branches that extend to the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) and facilitate LAPW isolation. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and durability of LAPW isolation with EIVOM.
Our cohort consisted of 413 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent both LAPW and MI ablations. EIVOM was first attempted in 177 (35%) patients with adequate VOMs. The VOM was infused with 5 mL of ethanol with a double coaxial guiding catheter technique. Both ablations were performed only by radiofrequency ablation (the RF group) in the remaining 236 (57%) patients.
EIVOM with 5 mL of ethanol was completely achieved in 106 patients (the EIVOM group). The application duration of LAPW isolation did not differ significantly between the two groups (718 ± 276 vs. 709 ± 288 s; p = .78). LAPW debulking ablation was required in 64/106 (60%) and 176/236 (75%) patients in the EIVOM and RF groups, respectively (p < .05). However, AF- or atrial tachycardia-free survival analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups (log-rank p = .70). Among the cases of recurrence, 17 and 38 patients underwent subsequent ablation sessions; LAPW was reconnected in 9/17 (53%) and 25/38 (53%) patients (p = .36) in the EIVOM and RF groups, respectively.
EIVOM reduced the number of cases that required LAPW debulking ablation but did not improve the durability of LAPW isolation or clinical outcomes.
向 Marshall 静脉(VM)内输注乙醇(EIVOM)有望成为二尖瓣峡部(MI)消融的辅助治疗方法。此外,EIVOM 可以通过延伸至左心房后壁(LAPW)的分支广泛消融心外膜,并有助于 LAPW 隔离。本研究旨在探讨 EIVOM 行 LAPW 隔离的疗效和持久性。
我们的队列包括 413 例接受 LAPW 和 MI 消融的房颤(AF)患者。在 177 例(35%)患者中首先尝试 EIVOM,使用双同轴引导导管技术向 VM 输注 5ml 乙醇。在其余 236 例(57%)患者中仅进行射频消融(RF 组)完成这两种消融。
106 例患者(EIVOM 组)成功完成了 5ml 乙醇的 EIVOM。两组 LAPW 隔离的应用时间无显著差异(718±276 秒与 709±288 秒;p=0.78)。EIVOM 组和 RF 组分别有 64/106(60%)和 176/236(75%)例患者需要进行 LAPW 减容消融(p<0.05)。然而,AF 或房性心动过速无复发生存分析显示两组之间无显著差异(对数秩检验 p=0.70)。在复发的病例中,17 例和 38 例患者接受了后续消融治疗;EIVOM 组和 RF 组中,9/17(53%)和 25/38(53%)例患者的 LAPW 再次连接(p=0.36)。
EIVOM 减少了需要 LAPW 减容消融的病例数,但并未改善 LAPW 隔离的持久性或临床结果。