Suppr超能文献

一项关于裸盖菇素与艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症试验的贝叶斯再分析。

A Bayesian Reanalysis of a Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression.

作者信息

Nayak Sandeep M, Bari Bilal A, Yaden David B, Spriggs Meg J, Rosas Fernando E, Peill Joseph M, Giribaldi Bruna, Erritzoe David, Nutt David J, Carhart-Harris Robin

机构信息

Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Psychedelic Med (New Rochelle). 2023 Mar;1(1):18-26. doi: 10.1089/psymed.2022.0002. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To perform a Bayesian reanalysis of a recent trial of psilocybin (COMP360) versus escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in order to provide a more informative interpretation of the indeterminate outcome of a previous frequentist analysis.

DESIGN

Reanalysis of a two-arm double-blind placebo controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-nine patients with MDD.

INTERVENTIONS

Two doses of psilocybin 25mg and daily oral placebo versus daily escitalopram and 2 doses of psilocybin 1mg, with psychological support for both groups.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS SR-16), and three other depression scales as secondary outcomes: HAMD-17, MADRS, and BDI-1A.

RESULTS

Using Bayes factors and 'skeptical priors' which bias estimates towards zero, for the hypothesis that psilocybin is superior by any margin, we found indeterminate evidence for QIDS SR-16, strong evidence for BDI-1A and MADRS, and extremely strong evidence for HAMD-17. For the stronger hypothesis that psilocybin is superior by a 'clinically meaningful amount' (using literature defined values of the minimally clinically important difference), we found moderate evidence against it for QIDS SR-16, indeterminate evidence for BDI-1A and MADRS, and moderate evidence supporting it for HAMD-17. Furthermore, across the board we found extremely strong evidence for psilocybin's non-inferiority versus escitalopram. These findings were robust to prior sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This Bayesian reanalysis supports the following inferences: 1) that psilocybin did indeed outperform escitalopram in this trial, but not to an extent that was clinically meaningful--and 2) that psilocybin is almost certainly non-inferior to escitalopram. The present results provide a more precise and nuanced interpretation to previously reported results from this trial, and support the need for further research into the relative efficacy of psilocybin therapy for depression with respect to current leading treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03429075.

摘要

目的

对近期一项关于裸盖菇素(COMP360)与艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的试验进行贝叶斯再分析,以便对先前频率学派分析中不确定的结果提供更有信息量的解释。

设计

对一项双臂双盲安慰剂对照试验进行再分析。

参与者

59例重度抑郁症患者。

干预措施

两剂25毫克裸盖菇素和每日口服安慰剂,与每日艾司西酞普兰以及两剂1毫克裸盖菇素对比,并为两组提供心理支持。

观察指标

抑郁症状快速自评量表(QIDS SR - 16),以及其他三个抑郁量表作为次要指标:汉密尔顿抑郁量表 - 17项(HAMD - 17)、蒙哥马利 - 艾森伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)和贝克抑郁量表 - 1A版(BDI - 1A)。

结果

使用贝叶斯因子和使估计偏向零的“怀疑性先验”,对于裸盖菇素在任何程度上更优的假设,我们发现QIDS SR - 16的证据不确定,BDI - 1A和MADRS的证据有力,HAMD - 17的证据极其有力。对于更强的假设,即裸盖菇素以“临床有意义的量”更优(使用文献定义的最小临床重要差异值),我们发现QIDS SR - 16有中等证据反对该假设,BDI - 1A和MADRS的证据不确定,HAMD - 17有中等证据支持该假设。此外,总体而言,我们发现裸盖菇素相对于艾司西酞普兰非劣效的证据极其有力。这些发现对先验敏感性分析具有稳健性。

结论

这项贝叶斯再分析支持以下推断:1)在该试验中裸盖菇素确实优于艾司西酞普兰,但未达到临床有意义的程度;2)裸盖菇素几乎肯定不劣于艾司西酞普兰。本研究结果为该试验先前报告的结果提供了更精确和细致入微的解释,并支持有必要进一步研究裸盖菇素疗法相对于当前主要治疗方法治疗抑郁症的相对疗效。

试验注册号

NCT03429075。

相似文献

1
A Bayesian Reanalysis of a Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression.
Psychedelic Med (New Rochelle). 2023 Mar;1(1):18-26. doi: 10.1089/psymed.2022.0002. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1402-1411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032994.
4
A critical evaluation of QIDS-SR-16 using data from a trial of psilocybin therapy versus escitalopram treatment for depression.
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Jul;37(7):717-732. doi: 10.1177/02698811231167848. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 May 1;78(5):481-489. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3285.
6
Assessing expectancy and suggestibility in a trial of escitalopram v. psilocybin for depression.
Psychol Med. 2024 Jun;54(8):1717-1724. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723003653. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Increased global integration in the brain after psilocybin therapy for depression.
Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):844-851. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01744-z. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
8
Therapeutic Alliance and Rapport Modulate Responses to Psilocybin Assisted Therapy for Depression.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 31;12:788155. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.788155. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jul 5;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01334-6.
4
Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1402-1411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032994.
6
Clinical trials in critical care: can a Bayesian approach enhance clinical and scientific decision making?
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Feb;9(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30471-9. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
7
Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence.
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Jul;23(7):788-799. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验