Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Women's Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA.
Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge and Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;162(2):383-394. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14923. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.
The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.
Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICm or IAm ).
The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
自 2009 年 FIGO 分期最后一次更新以来,人们对子宫内膜癌的病理和分子特征的理解已经取得了许多进展。现在,关于几种组织学类型的大量预后和生物学行为数据已经可用。自癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据发布以来,分子和遗传发现加速了,这为子宫内膜癌的不同生物学性质及其不同的预后结果提供了更清晰的认识。新分期系统的目标是更好地定义这些预后组,并创建亚分期,以指示更合适的手术、放疗和系统治疗。
FIGO 妇女癌症委员会于 2021 年 10 月任命了一个子宫内膜癌分期小组委员会,由作者代表。自那时以来,委员会成员经常开会,审查了关于子宫内膜癌的治疗、预后和生存的新证据和既定证据。基于这些数据,在每个分期中确定了对这些因素的分类和分层进行改进的机会。最近制定的 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 指南中进行和公布的分子和组织学分类的数据和分析被用作将新分类添加到建议的分子和组织学分期系统的模板。
基于现有证据,亚分期定义如下:I 期(IA1):局限于息肉或局限于子宫内膜的非侵袭性子宫内膜癌的组织学类型;(IA2)非侵袭性组织学类型的子宫内膜癌累及不超过 50%的子宫肌层,WHO 标准定义的无或局灶性脉管侵犯(LVSI);(IA3)局限于子宫的低级别子宫内膜样癌同时伴有低级别卵巢子宫内膜样累及;(IB)非侵袭性组织学类型累及 50%或更多的子宫肌层,无 LVSI 或局灶性 LVSI;(IC)侵袭性组织学类型,即浆液性、高级别子宫内膜样、透明细胞、癌肉瘤、未分化、混合和其他无任何肌层浸润的罕见类型。II 期(IIA):侵袭宫颈基质的非侵袭性组织学类型;(IIB)具有大量 LVSI 的非侵袭性组织学类型;或(IIC)具有任何肌层浸润的侵袭性组织学类型。III 期(IIIA):区分附件与子宫浆膜浸润;(IIIB)阴道/旁组织和盆腔腹膜转移;以及(IIIC)为盆腔和腹主动脉淋巴结转移的淋巴结转移的细化,包括微转移和巨转移。IV 期(IVA):浸润膀胱或直肠黏膜的局部晚期疾病;(IVB)盆腔外腹膜转移;和(IVC)远处转移。鼓励在所有子宫内膜癌中进行完整的分子分类(POLEmut、MMRd、NSMP、p53abn)。如果分子亚型已知,则在 FIGO 分期中通过添加“m”表示分子分类,并添加表示特定分子亚型的下标进行记录。当分子分类显示 I 期和 II 期的 p53abn 或 POLEmut 状态时,会导致疾病的升期或降期(IICm 或 IAm)。
2023 年子宫内膜癌分期包括各种组织学类型、肿瘤模式和分子分类,以更好地反映对几种子宫内膜癌的复杂性质及其潜在生物学行为的认识的提高。2023 年分期系统中纳入的变化应为治疗建议提供更具循证依据的背景,并为更精细的未来预后和生存数据收集提供更精细的依据。