• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现金流管理及其对企业绩效的影响:来自中国非金融企业的实证证据。

Cash flow management and its effect on firm performance: Empirical evidence on non-financial firms of China.

机构信息

School of Accounting, Xijing University, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China.

Department of Economics and Management Sciences, NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi City, Pakistan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 20;18(6):e0287135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287135. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0287135
PMID:37339157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10281586/
Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of changes in cash flow measures and metrics on firm financial performance. The study uses generalized estimating equations (GEEs) methodology to analyze longitudinal data for sample of 20288 listed Chinese non-financial firms from the period 2018:q2-2020:q1. The main advantage of GEEs method over other estimation techniques is its ability to robustly estimate the variances of regression coefficients for data samples that display high correlation between repeated measurements. The findings of study show that the decline in cash flow measures and metrics bring significant positive improvements in the financial performance of firms. The empirical evidence suggests that performance improvement levers (i.e. cash flow measures and metrics) are more pronounced in low leverage firms, suggesting that changes in cash flow measures and metrics bring more positive changes in low leverage firms' financial performance relatively to high leveraged firms. The results hold after mitigating endogeneity based on dynamic panel system generalized method of moments (GMM) and sensitivity analysis considering the robustness of main findings. The paper makes significant contribution to the literature related to cash flow management and working capital management. Since, this paper is among few to empirically study, how cash flow measures and metrics are related to firm performance from dynamic stand point especially from the context of Chinese non-financial firms.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是探讨现金流计量和指标的变化对企业财务绩效的影响。本研究采用广义估计方程(GEEs)方法,对 2018 年第二季度至 2020 年第一季度期间的 20288 家中国非金融上市公司的样本进行了纵向数据分析。GEEs 方法相对于其他估计技术的主要优势在于,它能够稳健地估计具有高度相关性的重复测量数据样本的回归系数方差。研究结果表明,现金流计量和指标的下降带来了企业财务绩效的显著积极改善。实证证据表明,在低杠杆率企业中,业绩提升杠杆(即现金流计量和指标)更为明显,这表明现金流计量和指标的变化相对于高杠杆率企业而言,在低杠杆率企业的财务绩效中带来了更为积极的变化。在基于动态面板系统广义矩估计(GMM)和考虑主要发现稳健性的敏感性分析缓解内生性问题后,结果仍然成立。本文为现金流管理和营运资金管理相关文献做出了重要贡献。因为,本文是少数从动态角度,特别是从中国非金融企业的角度,实证研究现金流计量和指标与企业绩效之间关系的论文之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2f/10281586/b6056f8c7fbe/pone.0287135.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2f/10281586/b6056f8c7fbe/pone.0287135.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2f/10281586/b6056f8c7fbe/pone.0287135.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cash flow management and its effect on firm performance: Empirical evidence on non-financial firms of China.现金流管理及其对企业绩效的影响:来自中国非金融企业的实证证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 20;18(6):e0287135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287135. eCollection 2023.
2
Country risk, global uncertainty, and firms' cash holdings: Do the role of law, culture, and financial market development matter?国家风险、全球不确定性与企业现金持有量:法律、文化和金融市场发展的作用重要吗?
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 20;10(5):e26266. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26266. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
3
COVID-19 impact on firm investment-Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms.新冠疫情对企业投资的影响——来自中国上市公司的证据
J Asian Econ. 2021 Aug;75:101320. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101320. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
Understanding the dynamics of capital structure, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility in high- and low-leveraged US and Chinese firms.理解美国和中国高杠杆和低杠杆公司的资本结构、公司治理和企业社会责任的动态。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(16):46204-46221. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24843-3. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Firms' COVID-19 Pandemic Exposure and Corporate Cash Policy: Evidence from China.企业的新冠疫情暴露与公司现金政策:来自中国的证据
Econ Model. 2022 Nov;116:105999. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105999. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
6
Do the trade credit influence firm performance in agro-industry? Evidence from Thailand.贸易信贷对农业产业企业绩效有影响吗?来自泰国的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 14;9(3):e14561. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14561. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Do public subsidies trigger firms' overinvestment? Evidence from the Korean renewable energy technology industry.公共补贴是否会引发企业过度投资?来自韩国可再生能源技术产业的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(2):3367-3382. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22429-7. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
8
FAMILY FIRMS, BANK RELATIONSHIPS, AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS: A COMPREHENSIVE SCORE CARD.家族企业、银行关系与财务约束:一份综合计分卡
Int Econ Rev (Philadelphia). 2019 May;60(2):547-593. doi: 10.1111/iere.12362. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
9
The impact of COVID-19 on the valuations of non-financial European firms.新冠疫情对欧洲非金融企业估值的影响。
Heliyon. 2022 Jun;8(6):e09486. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09486. Epub 2022 May 22.
10
Is it good to hold more cash before the pandemic? A case of Taiwanese firms.在疫情之前持有更多现金是否有益?以台湾企业为例。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun;9(6):e16050. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16050. Epub 2023 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The countercyclical long-term operating accrual-based trading strategy in the Stoxx Europe 600 index: The importance of asset and liability components.斯托克欧洲600指数中的反周期长期基于运营应计项目的交易策略:资产与负债组成部分的重要性。
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0266045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266045. eCollection 2022.
2
To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health.要 GEE 还是不要 GEE:比较人群平均和混合模型来估计邻里风险因素与健康之间的关联。
Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):467-74. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181caeb90.
3
How fast can your company afford to grow?
你的公司能够承受多快的增长速度?
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 May;79(5):135-4, 166.
4
Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.离散和连续结果的纵向数据分析。
Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30.