Suppr超能文献

抗阻运动、肌肉运动控制和基于正念的练习治疗慢性非特异性颈痛的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析及剂量反应meta 回归。

Resistance, Motor Control, and Mindfulness-Based Exercises Are Effective for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Dose-Response Meta-Regression.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Aug;53(8):420–459. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11820.

Abstract

We aimed to analyze the effects and dose-response relationship of the most effective exercises for improving pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched the PubMed, PEDro, and CENTRAL databases from their inception to September 30, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials that involved people with chronic neck pain adopting a longitudinal exercise intervention and assessed one pain and/or disability outcome. Restricted maximum-likelihood random-effects meta-analyses were modeled separately for resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises; standardized mean differences (Hedge's , standardized mean difference [SMD]) were effect estimators. Meta-regressions (dependent variable: effect sizes of the interventions; independent variables: training dose and control group effects) were conducted to explore the dose-response relationship for therapy success of any exercise type. We included 68 trials. Compared to true control, effects on pain and disability were significantly larger for resistance exercise (pain: SMD, -1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.26, -0.28; | = 96%; disability: SMD, -1.76; 95% CI: -3.16, -0.37; | = 98%), motor control exercise (pain: SMD, -2.29; 95% CI: -3.82, -0.75; | = 98%; disability: SMD, -2.42; 95% CI: -3.38, -1.47; | = 94%), and Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise (pain: SMD, 1.91; 95% CI:-3.28, -0.55; | = 96%; disability: SMD, -0.62; 95% CI: -0.85, -0.38; | = 0%). Yoga/Pilates/Tai Chi/Qui Gong exercise was more effective than other exercises (SMD, -0.84; 95% CI: -1.553, -0.13; | = 86%) for reducing pain. For disability, motor control exercise was superior to other exercises (SMD, -0.70; 95% CI: -1.23, -0.17; | = 98%). There was no dose-response relationship for resistance exercise ( = 0.32). Higher frequencies (estimate = -0.10) and longer durations (estimate = -0.11) of motor control exercise had larger effects on pain ( = 0.72). Longer sessions (estimate = -0.13) of motor control exercise had larger effects on disability ( = 0.61). Resistance, mindfulness-based, and motor control exercises were effective for reducing neck pain (very low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Higher frequencies and longer duration of sessions had a significant effect on pain for motor control exercise. .

摘要

我们旨在分析最有效的运动对改善慢性非特异性颈痛患者疼痛和残疾的效果和剂量反应关系。 干预系统评价与荟萃分析。 我们从 PubMed、PEDro 和 CENTRAL 数据库的成立到 2022 年 9 月 30 日进行了搜索。 我们纳入了采用纵向运动干预并评估了一个疼痛和/或残疾结局的随机对照试验。 分别对阻力、基于正念和运动控制运动进行受限最大似然随机效应荟萃分析;标准化均数差(Hedge's ,标准化均数差 [SMD])是效应估计量。 进行了荟萃回归(因变量:任何运动类型的治疗效果的效应大小;自变量:训练剂量和对照组效果),以探讨任何运动类型的治疗效果的剂量反应关系。 我们纳入了 68 项试验。 与真实对照相比,阻力运动(疼痛:SMD,-1.27;95%置信区间 [CI]:-2.26,-0.28;|=96%;残疾:SMD,-1.76;95%CI:-3.16,-0.37;|=98%)、运动控制运动(疼痛:SMD,-2.29;95%CI:-3.82,-0.75;|=98%;残疾:SMD,-2.42;95%CI:-3.38,-1.47;|=94%)和瑜伽/普拉提/太极/气功运动(疼痛:SMD,1.91;95%CI:-3.28,-0.55;|=96%;残疾:SMD,-0.62;95%CI:-0.85,-0.38;|=0%)对疼痛和残疾的影响明显更大。 瑜伽/普拉提/太极/气功运动在减轻疼痛方面比其他运动(SMD,-0.84;95%CI:-1.553,-0.13;|=86%)更有效。 在残疾方面,运动控制运动优于其他运动(SMD,-0.70;95%CI:-1.23,-0.17;|=98%)。 阻力运动没有剂量反应关系( = 0.32)。 更高的频率(估计值 = -0.10)和更长的持续时间(估计值 = -0.11)对运动控制运动的疼痛有更大的影响( = 0.72)。 更长的运动控制运动时间(估计值 = -0.13)对残疾有更大的影响( = 0.61)。 阻力、基于正念和运动控制运动对减轻颈部疼痛有效(非常低至中等确定性证据)。 更高的频率和更长的持续时间对运动控制运动的疼痛有显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验