Erasmus MC University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;62(12):1363-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.03.024. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
Youth with symptoms of emotion dysregulation are at risk for a multitude of psychiatric diagnoses later in life. However, few studies have focused on the underlying neurobiology of emotion dysregulation. This study assessed the bidirectional relationship between emotion dysregulation symptoms and brain morphology throughout childhood and adolescence.
A combined total of 8,235 children and adolescents drawn from 2 large population-based cohorts, the Generation R Study and Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, were included. Data were acquired in 3 waves in Generation R (mean [SD] age = 7.8 [1.0] wave 1 [W1]; 10.1 [0.6] W2; 13.9 [0.5] W3) and in 2 waves in ABCD (mean [SD] age = 9.9 [0.6] W1; 11.9 [0.6] W2). Cross-lagged panel models were used to determine the bidirectional relationships between emotion dysregulation symptoms and brain morphology. The study was preregistered before performing analyses.
In the Generation R sample, emotion dysregulation symptoms at W1 preceded lower hippocampal (β = -.07, SE = 0.03, p = .017) and temporal pole (β = -.19, SE = 0.07, p = .006) volumes at W2. Emotion dysregulation symptoms at W2 preceded lower fractional anisotropy in the uncinate fasciculus (β = -.11, SE = 0.05, p = .017) and corticospinal tract (β = -.12, SE = 0.05, p = .012). In the ABCD sample, emotion dysregulation symptoms preceded posterior cingulate (β = .01, SE = 0.003, p = .014) and nucleus accumbens volumes (left hemisphere: β = -.02, SE = 0.01, p = .014; right hemisphere: β = -.02, SE = 0.01, p = .003).
In population-based samples, with relatively low psychopathology symptoms in the majority of children, symptoms of emotion dysregulation can precede differential development of brain morphology. This provides the foundation for future work to assess to what extent optimal brain development can be promoted through early intervention.
The Bidirectional Relationship Between Brain Features and the Dysregulation Profile: A Longitudinal, Multimodal Approach; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2022.03.008.
DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT: We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.
有情绪调节障碍症状的年轻人在以后的生活中可能会出现多种精神科诊断。然而,很少有研究关注情绪调节障碍的潜在神经生物学。本研究评估了情绪调节障碍症状与整个儿童期和青春期大脑形态之间的双向关系。
共有来自 2 个大型人群队列的 8235 名儿童和青少年被纳入这项综合研究,这两个队列分别是“生育队列研究”(Generation R Study)和“青少年大脑认知发展研究”(Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study,ABCD Study)。在 Generation R 中,数据分 3 次采集(第 1 波平均[标准差]年龄为 7.8[1.0]岁,W1;第 10.1[0.6]岁,W2;第 13.9[0.5]岁,W3),在 ABCD 中,数据分 2 次采集(第 1 波平均[标准差]年龄为 9.9[0.6]岁,W1;第 11.9[0.6]岁,W2)。使用交叉滞后面板模型来确定情绪调节障碍症状和大脑形态之间的双向关系。在进行分析之前,该研究已经进行了预先注册。
在 Generation R 样本中,W1 时的情绪调节障碍症状先于 W2 时的海马体(β=-0.07,SE=0.03,p=0.017)和颞极(β=-0.19,SE=0.07,p=0.006)体积减小。W2 时的情绪调节障碍症状先于 W2 时的钩束(β=-0.11,SE=0.05,p=0.017)和皮质脊髓束(β=-0.12,SE=0.05,p=0.012)的各向异性分数降低。在 ABCD 样本中,情绪调节障碍症状先于后扣带回(β=0.01,SE=0.003,p=0.014)和伏隔核体积增加(左侧:β=-0.02,SE=0.01,p=0.014;右侧:β=-0.02,SE=0.01,p=0.003)。
在基于人群的样本中,大多数儿童的精神病理学症状相对较低,情绪调节障碍的症状可能先于大脑形态的差异发展。这为未来的研究奠定了基础,即通过早期干预,大脑的最佳发育在多大程度上可以得到促进。
大脑特征与失调特征之间的双向关系:一项纵向、多模态研究;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2022.03.008。
我们努力确保研究问卷的编写方式具有包容性。本文的作者名单包括来自研究地点和/或社区的贡献者,他们参与了数据收集、设计、分析和/或解释工作。