Animal Resources Center and Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2023 Jul 5;62(4):291-302. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000002. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
At our institution, the techniques that technicians use for health checks vary for mice housed in cages on individually ventilated caging (IVC) racks. If the mice cannot be adequately visualized, some technicians partially undock the cage whereas others use an LED flashlight. These actions undoubtedly alter the cage microenvironment, particularly with regard to noise, vibration, and light, which are known to affect multiple welfare and research-related parameters in mice. The central aim of this study was to assess the effects of partial cage undocking and LED flashlight use during daily health checks on fecundity, nest building scores, and hair corticosterone concentrations in C57BL/6J mice to determine the least disturbing method of performing these health checks. In addition, we used an accelerometer, a microphone, and a light meter to measure intracage noise, vibration, and light under each condition. Breeding pairs ( = 100 pairs) were randomly assigned to one of 3 health check groups: partial undocking, LED flashlight, or control (in which mice were observed without any cage manipulation). We hypothesized that mice exposed to a flashlight or cage undocking during daily health checks would have fewer pups, poorer nest building scores, and higher hair corticosterone levels than did the control mice. We found no statistically significant difference in fecundity, nest building scores, or hair corticosterone levels between either experimental group as compared with the control group. However, hair corticosterone levels were significantly affected by the cage height on the rack and the amount of time on study. These results indicate that a short duration, once-daily exposure to partial cage undocking or to an LED flashlight during daily healthy checks does not affect breeding performance or wellbeing, as measured by nest scores and hair corticosterone levels, in C57BL/6J mice.
在我们的机构中,对于饲养在独立通风笼具(IVC)架上的笼子中的老鼠,技术人员进行健康检查所使用的技术有所不同。如果无法充分观察到老鼠,有些技术人员会部分卸下笼子,而有些则使用 LED 手电筒。这些操作无疑会改变笼子的微环境,尤其是在噪音、振动和光照方面,众所周知,这些因素会影响老鼠的多个福利和研究相关参数。本研究的主要目的是评估在日常健康检查期间部分卸下笼子和使用 LED 手电筒对 C57BL/6J 老鼠的繁殖能力、筑巢评分和皮质酮水平的影响,以确定进行这些健康检查的最不干扰方法。此外,我们使用加速度计、麦克风和光度计来测量每种情况下笼子内的噪音、振动和光照。繁殖对(= 100 对)被随机分配到 3 个健康检查组之一:部分卸下笼子、使用 LED 手电筒或对照组(在没有任何笼子操作的情况下观察老鼠)。我们假设,与对照组相比,在日常健康检查中暴露于手电筒或笼子卸下的老鼠的幼崽数量更少、筑巢评分更低、皮质酮水平更高。我们发现,与对照组相比,实验组中的任何一组在繁殖能力、筑巢评分或皮质酮水平上均无统计学差异。然而,皮质酮水平受到笼架高度和研究时间长短的显著影响。这些结果表明,在日常健康检查期间,短时间、每天一次暴露于部分卸下笼子或 LED 手电筒不会影响 C57BL/6J 老鼠的繁殖性能或健康状况,这可以通过筑巢评分和皮质酮水平来衡量。