Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Neurosci. 2023 Jul 12;43(28):5251-5263. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1743-22.2023. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
Intrinsic delays in sensory feedback can be detrimental for motor control. As a compensation strategy, the brain predicts the sensory consequences of movement via a forward model on the basis of a copy of the motor command. Using these predictions, the brain attenuates somatosensory reafference to facilitate the processing of exafferent information. Theoretically, this predictive attenuation is disrupted by (even minimal) temporal errors between the predicted and actual reafference; however, direct evidence of such disruption is lacking as previous neuroimaging studies contrasted nondelayed reafferent input with exafferent input. Here, we combined psychophysics with functional magnetic resonance imaging to test whether subtle perturbations in the timing of somatosensory reafference disrupt its predictive processing. Twenty-eight participants (14 women) generated touches on their left index finger by tapping a sensor with their right index finger. The touches on the left index finger were delivered close to the time of contact of the two fingers or with a temporal perturbation (i.e., 153 ms delay). We found that such a brief temporal perturbation disrupted the attenuation of the somatosensory reafference at both the perceptual and neural levels, leading to greater somatosensory and cerebellar responses and weaker somatosensory connectivity with the cerebellum, proportional to the perceptual changes. We interpret these effects as the failure of the forward model to predictively attenuate the perturbed somatosensory reafference. Moreover, we observed increased connectivity of the supplementary motor area with the cerebellum during the perturbations, which could indicate the communication of the temporal prediction error back to the motor centers. Our brain receives somatosensory feedback from our movements with a delay. To counteract these delays, motor control theories postulate that the brain predicts the timing of somatosensory consequences of our movements and attenuates sensations received at that time. Thus, a self-generated touch feels weaker than an identical external touch. However, how subtle temporal errors between the predicted and actual somatosensory feedback perturb this predictive attenuation remains unknown. We show that such errors make the otherwise attenuated touch feel stronger, elicit stronger somatosensory responses, weaken cerebellar connectivity with somatosensory areas, and increase this connectivity with motor areas. These findings show that motor and cerebellar areas are fundamental in forming temporal predictions about the sensory consequences of our movements.
内在的感觉反馈延迟可能对运动控制有害。作为一种补偿策略,大脑会基于运动指令的副本通过前向模型来预测运动的感觉后果。利用这些预测,大脑会减弱体感再传入以促进外导信息的处理。从理论上讲,这种预测衰减会被预测和实际再传入之间的(即使是最小的)时间误差破坏;然而,由于以前的神经影像学研究将无延迟的再传入输入与外导输入进行了对比,因此缺乏这种破坏的直接证据。在这里,我们将心理物理学与功能磁共振成像相结合,以测试体感再传入的时间细微扰动是否会破坏其预测处理。28 名参与者(14 名女性)用右食指敲击传感器来触摸左食指。左食指的触摸是在两个手指接触时或在时间上有扰动时(即 153 毫秒延迟)完成的。我们发现,这种短暂的时间扰动会破坏体感再传入在感知和神经水平上的衰减,导致更大的体感和小脑反应,以及与小脑的体感连接变弱,与感知变化成比例。我们将这些影响解释为前向模型未能预测性地衰减受扰的体感再传入。此外,我们在扰动期间观察到辅助运动区与小脑之间的连接增加,这可能表明时间预测误差被传回到运动中心。我们的大脑会延迟接收来自运动的感觉反馈。为了抵消这些延迟,运动控制理论假设大脑会预测我们运动的体感后果的时间,并减弱此时接收到的感觉。因此,自产生的触摸感觉比相同的外部触摸弱。然而,预测和实际体感反馈之间的细微时间误差如何干扰这种预测衰减仍然未知。我们表明,这些误差会使原本减弱的触摸感觉更强,引起更强的体感反应,减弱小脑与体感区域的连接,并增加与运动区域的连接。这些发现表明,运动和小脑区域对于形成关于我们运动的感觉后果的时间预测至关重要。