Matsukawa Yoshihisa, Kameya Yoshitaka, Takahashi Tomoichi, Shimazu Atsuki, Ishida Shohei, Yamada Muneo, Sassa Naoto, Yamamoto Tokunori
Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Information Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2023 Oct;30(10):907-912. doi: 10.1111/iju.15233. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
To elucidate the characteristics of uroflowmetry (UFM) observed in men with detrusor underactivity (DU) using our developed artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic algorithm to distinguish between DU and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).
Subjective and objective parameters, including four UFM parameters (first peak flow rate, time to first peak, gradient to first peak, and the ratio of first peak flow rate to maximum flow rate [Q ]) selected by analyzing the judgment basis of the AI diagnostic system, were compared in 266 treatment-naive men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Patients were divided into the DU (70; 26.32%) and non-DU (196; 73.68%) groups, and the UFM parameters for predicting the presence of DU were determined by multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Detrusor underactivity was defined as a bladder contractility index <100 and a BOO index <40.
Most parameters on the first peak flow of UFM were significantly lower in the DU group. On multivariate analysis, lower first peak flow rate and lower ratio of first peak flow rate to Q were significant parameters to predict DU. In the ROC analysis, the ratio of the first peak flow rate to Q showed the highest area under the curve (0.848) and yielded sensitivities of 76% and specificities of 83% for DU diagnosis, with cutoff values of 0.8.
Parameters on the first peak flow of UFM, especially the ratio of the first peak flow rate to Q , can diagnose DU with high accuracy in men with LUTS.
使用我们开发的人工智能(AI)诊断算法来阐明逼尿肌活动低下(DU)男性患者的尿流率测定(UFM)特征,以区分DU和膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)。
对266例初治的下尿路症状(LUTS)男性患者的主观和客观参数进行比较,这些参数包括通过分析AI诊断系统的判断依据所选择的四个UFM参数(首次排尿峰值流速、首次排尿峰值时间、首次排尿峰值梯度以及首次排尿峰值流速与最大流速之比[Q ])。患者被分为DU组(70例;26.32%)和非DU组(196例;73.68%),通过多因素分析和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定预测DU存在的UFM参数。逼尿肌活动低下定义为膀胱收缩力指数<100且BOO指数<40。
DU组UFM首次排尿峰值的大多数参数显著更低。多因素分析显示,较低的首次排尿峰值流速和较低的首次排尿峰值流速与Q之比是预测DU的显著参数。在ROC分析中,首次排尿峰值流速与Q之比的曲线下面积最高(0.848),诊断DU的敏感度为76%,特异度为83%,截断值为0.8。
UFM首次排尿峰值的参数,尤其是首次排尿峰值流速与Q之比,能够在LUTS男性患者中高精度地诊断DU。