Abraham Atul, Panicker Varghese Thomas, Mohanan Nair Krishna Kumar, Karunakaran Jayakumar
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India 695011.
Department of Cardiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India 695011.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;39(4):340-349. doi: 10.1007/s12055-022-01471-7. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
Very few reports elaborate on the changes in P wave following superior septal approach to the mitral valve. We aimed to describe the changes in the P wave axis and other electrocardiographic changes following this approach among patients preoperatively in sinus rhythm.
We did a retrospective review of medical records among all our patients undergoing superior septal approach for mitral valve surgery from September 2014 to September 2019. Electrocardiograms during hospital stay and until 6-month follow-up were analyzed. A deviation in P wave axis from the normal range of + 30 to + 60° was classified as ectopic atrial rhythm.
In the study population of 47 patients (age 16-75 years, 51.3 ± 13.6 years; M:F ratio 3.7:1), who were in normal sinus rhythm preoperatively, 34 patients (72.3%) had a visible P wave on electrocardiogram (ECG) at discharge. Among them, the P wave axes of 17 patients (36.2%) were within normal range (normal sinus rhythm), whereas 17 patients (36.2%) had ectopic atrial rhythm at discharge. The most frequent abnormal P wave axis was between 0 and - 30° (12 patients). At 6 months, 8 patients (17.0%) had a persistent ectopic atrial rhythm. These patients underwent a Holter test at 6 months and were followed up for symptomatic bradycardia for 3 years. None of the patients with ectopic atrial rhythm required pacemaker insertion.
Persistence of ectopic atrial rhythm at 6 months is common (17%) after superior septal approach. Documentation of P wave axis after this approach will help avoid missing it. These patients may be kept on follow-up to look for symptomatic bradycardia.
极少有报告详细阐述二尖瓣上间隔入路术后P波的变化。我们旨在描述窦性心律患者采用该入路术后P波电轴的变化及其他心电图变化。
我们对2014年9月至2019年9月期间所有接受二尖瓣手术上间隔入路的患者的病历进行了回顾性研究。分析了住院期间及6个月随访期内的心电图。P波电轴偏离正常范围+30°至+60°被归类为异位心律。
在47例术前为正常窦性心律的研究人群中(年龄16 - 75岁,平均51.3±13.6岁;男女比例3.7:1),34例患者(72.3%)出院时心电图上有可见P波。其中,17例患者(36.2%)的P波电轴在正常范围内(正常窦性心律),而17例患者(36.2%)出院时存在异位心律。最常见的异常P波电轴在0°至 - 30°之间(12例患者)。6个月时,8例患者(17.0%)仍存在持续性异位心律。这些患者在6个月时进行了动态心电图检查,并对症状性心动过缓进行了3年随访。异位心律患者均无需植入起搏器。
上间隔入路术后6个月持续性异位心律很常见(17%)。记录该入路术后的P波电轴有助于避免漏诊。这些患者可进行随访以寻找症状性心动过缓。