Steinberg Hillary, Garfield Tamara, Becker Alec, Shea Lindsay
Policy Analytics Center, AJ Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Jun 1;5(2):204-209. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0079. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
Calls for improved measures of gender identity to understand the experience of transgender individuals have grown rapidly in the past 5 years. The need for methodological innovation in this topic area has particular importance for the autistic population since a higher co-occurrence of transgender identities among autistic people has been documented but is not well understood. We use a survey with questions that reflect standards in 2018 to demonstrate how binary conceptualizations of gender did not adequately capture gender identities of transgender autistic individuals.
Using descriptive statistics from a statewide survey of 1527 autistic adults (mean age 27.5 years), this study compared self-reported survey responses to close-ended standard questions at the time about gender identity to understand shortcomings in capturing this population authentically.
We found a mismatch between respondents answering that they were transgender, the sex assigned at birth, and gender identity on separate questions. We postulate that transgender men and women were likely selecting binary responses when asked about gender identity. Furthermore, we found that many qualitative responses reported in the self-selected "other" category reflected nonbinary identities and utilized specific terminology that revealed nuance in how they understood gender identities.
We urge researchers to provide multiple flexible options when measuring gender identity in autistic populations as they are likely to encompass many identities. We endorse best practices for measuring gender identity for autistic research.
在过去5年里,要求改进性别认同衡量方法以了解跨性别者经历的呼声迅速增加。由于已有文献记载自闭症人群中跨性别身份的共现率较高,但尚未得到充分理解,因此在这一主题领域进行方法创新的需求对自闭症人群尤为重要。我们使用了一项包含反映2018年标准问题的调查,以证明性别的二元概念如何无法充分捕捉跨性别自闭症个体的性别认同。
本研究利用对1527名自闭症成年人(平均年龄27.5岁)进行的全州范围调查的描述性统计数据,将自我报告的调查回答与当时关于性别认同的封闭式标准问题进行比较,以了解在真实捕捉这一人群方面的不足。
我们发现,在关于跨性别、出生时被指定的性别以及性别认同的不同问题上,受访者的回答存在不匹配。我们推测,跨性别男性和女性在被问及性别认同时可能选择了二元回答。此外,我们发现,在自我选择的“其他”类别中报告的许多定性回答反映了非二元身份,并使用了特定术语,揭示了他们理解性别认同的细微差别。
我们敦促研究人员在测量自闭症人群的性别认同时提供多种灵活选项,因为他们可能涵盖多种身份。我们认可自闭症研究中测量性别认同的最佳做法。