• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症患者的死胎风险。

Risk of stillbirth in United States patients with diagnosed intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):453.e1-453.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.036. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.036
PMID:37348778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10651178/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with a 4- to 10-fold increase in the risk of stillbirth in the absence of intervention, leading to recommendations for antenatal assessment, ursodiol use, and often preterm or early term delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether current management strategies for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy mitigate the elevated risk of stillbirth at a population level.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2015-2020 National Readmissions Database, an administrative database developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Our study identified delivery hospitalizations, gestational age at delivery, occurrence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and stillbirth, and comorbid conditions using the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis and procedure codes. Moreover, this study compared the timing of delivery and stillbirth rates of pregnant patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy vs those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy at the time of delivery hospitalization.

RESULTS

This study identified a cohort of 9,987,705 delivery hospitalizations in the National Readmissions Database, corresponding to a weighted national estimate of 18,609,207 births. Of these births, 152,040 (0.8%) were noted to have an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis. Patients with an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis were older, with small differences in comorbidities, such as a higher rate of gestational diabetes mellitus, than patients without an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis at delivery hospitalization. The overall rates of stillbirth were lower among those with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy than among those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (252 vs 386 per 100,000 deliveries; risk difference, 133 fewer per 100,000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 98-170), a finding that persisted after adjustment for insurance status, socioeconomic factors, and comorbid conditions (risk difference, 160 fewer stillbirths per 100,000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 127-194). Furthermore, although patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy were more likely to deliver before term than those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (30.1% vs 9.3%; P<.001), increased rates of stillbirth were not noted at any point after stratification of the cohort by gestational age at delivery.

CONCLUSION

Patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis codes delivered earlier than those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis codes, but the percentage of births affected by stillbirth was lower, even when stratifying for gestational age at birth. These results may provide reassurance to patients receiving an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis that current management does mitigate stillbirth risk in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

摘要

背景

妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症(Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy,ICP)如果不进行干预,其导致死胎的风险会增加 4 至 10 倍,因此建议进行产前评估、熊去氧胆酸(Ursodiol)治疗,并常采取早产或早期分娩。

目的

本研究旨在确定当前妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症的管理策略是否能降低人群水平的死胎风险。

研究设计

这是一项使用 2015-2020 年全国再入院数据库(National Readmissions Database)的回顾性队列研究,该数据库是由美国医疗保健研究与质量局开发的行政数据库。我们的研究使用国际疾病分类(International Classification of Diseases)诊断和手术代码确定分娩住院、分娩时的孕龄、妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症和死胎的发生情况以及合并症。此外,本研究比较了有和无妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症孕妇在分娩住院时的分娩时机和死胎率。

结果

本研究在全国再入院数据库中确定了一个 9987705 例分娩住院的队列,相当于全国估计的 18609207 例分娩。在这些分娩中,有 152040 例(0.8%)被诊断为妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症。与没有妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症的孕妇相比,有妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症诊断的孕妇年龄更大,合并症的差异较小,如妊娠期糖尿病的发生率更高。有妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症诊断的孕妇的死胎率总体上低于没有妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症诊断的孕妇(每 10 万例分娩中有 252 例 vs 386 例;风险差异为每 10 万例分娩减少 133 例;95%置信区间为 98-170),这一发现在调整了保险状况、社会经济因素和合并症后仍然存在(风险差异为每 10 万例分娩减少 160 例死胎;95%置信区间为 127-194)。此外,尽管有妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症的孕妇比没有妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症的孕妇更有可能早产(30.1% vs 9.3%;P<.001),但在按分娩时孕龄分层后,在任何时间点都没有观察到死胎率增加。

结论

有妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症诊断代码的孕妇比没有妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症诊断代码的孕妇分娩更早,但即使考虑到出生时的孕龄,受死胎影响的分娩比例也较低。这些结果可能会让接受妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症诊断的患者感到安心,即当前的管理确实降低了妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症的死胎风险。

相似文献

1
Risk of stillbirth in United States patients with diagnosed intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.美国妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症患者的死胎风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;229(4):453.e1-453.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.036. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
Beyond stillbirth: association of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy severity and adverse outcomes.超越死胎:妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症严重程度与不良结局的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):517.e1-517.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.013. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
The risk of infant and fetal death by each additional week of expectant management in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy by gestational age.妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症按孕周计算,期待治疗每增加一周时婴儿及胎儿死亡的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):667.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
4
Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses.妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症不良围产结局与生化标志物的关联:汇总和个体患者数据荟萃分析结果。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 2;393(10174):899-909. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31877-4. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
5
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: a 12-year population-based cohort study.妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症及相关不良妊娠和胎儿结局:一项为期 12 年的基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):717-23. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12174. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
6
Postpartum readmission risk: a comparison between stillbirths and live births.产后再入院风险:死胎与活产的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;231(4):463.e1-463.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.017. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
7
Predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症不良新生儿结局的预测因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):570.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Cholestasis: A Prospective Study of Perinatal Outcomes and Time to Symptom Improvement.胆汁淤积症:围产期结局和症状改善时间的前瞻性研究。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Apr;38(5):414-420. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717076. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with hepatitis C and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: The sum of the parts.妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症合并丙型肝炎患者的母婴结局:各部分的总和。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0293030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293030. eCollection 2023.
10
[The role of bile acid measurement in the management of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy].[胆汁酸测定在妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症管理中的作用]
Orv Hetil. 2022 May 15;163(20):797-805. doi: 10.1556/650.2022.32474.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions-A Review of the Literature.妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症:诊断、管理及未来方向——文献综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 10;15(16):2002. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162002.
2
The Effect of Pregnancy on Dermatological Disorders: A Systematic Review.妊娠对皮肤病的影响:一项系统评价。
Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 21;15(4):68. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15040068.
3
Global and regional incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症的全球及区域发病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 28;23(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03935-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond stillbirth: association of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy severity and adverse outcomes.超越死胎:妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症严重程度与不良结局的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):517.e1-517.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.013. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
2
Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.熊去氧胆酸治疗妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症:系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;6(7):547-558. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00074-1. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #53: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Replaces Consult #13, April 2011.母胎医学会咨询系列第 53 号:妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症:取代 2011 年 4 月的咨询 13 号。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;224(2):B2-B9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
4
An Expanded Obstetric Comorbidity Scoring System for Predicting Severe Maternal Morbidity.一种扩展的产科合并症评分系统,用于预测严重产妇发病率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):440-449. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004022.
5
Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial.熊去氧胆酸与安慰剂治疗妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症妇女(PITCHES):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):849-860. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31270-X. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Marginal Effects-Quantifying the Effect of Changes in Risk Factors in Logistic Regression Models.边际效应——量化逻辑回归模型中风险因素变化的影响
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1304-1305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1954.
7
Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses.妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症不良围产结局与生化标志物的关联:汇总和个体患者数据荟萃分析结果。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 2;393(10174):899-909. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31877-4. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 764: Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.764:医学指征的晚期早产儿和早期足月产儿分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e151-e155. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003083.
9
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Review of six national and regional guidelines.妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症:六项国家和地区指南综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Dec;231:180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.041. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
10
The risk of infant and fetal death by each additional week of expectant management in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy by gestational age.妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症按孕周计算,期待治疗每增加一周时婴儿及胎儿死亡的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):667.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Feb 14.