Division of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest 1088, Hungary.
Division of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest 1088, Hungary.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023 Oct;52(8):102625. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102625. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was introduced to achieve fertilization in cases of severe male factor infertility. However, ICSI is often used in cases of non-male factor infertility, such as advanced maternal age or low oocyte number, but the clinical benefit of the method in these indications has not been proven.
A prospective randomized study was conducted in a university clinic between 2018 and 2020. Patients with ≥40 years of age and/or ≤4 oocytes with non-sever male factor infertility were randomized into conventional IVF or ICSI groups. Fertilization rate, embryo quality, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were compared.
A total of 336 IVF cycles (169 conventional IVF and 167 ICSI) were involved in the study. The fertilization rate was higher in the conventional IVF group compared to the ICSI group (IVF: 61.7%, ICSI: 53.4%, P=0.001). Embryo development and morphology did not show considerable difference between groups. Implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate were 13.1%, 24.3% and 11.4% in the conventional IVF and 10.4%, 19.0%, 12.0% in the ICSI group. The differences were not significant. Subgroup analysis showed a significantly better clinical outcome following conventional IVF when advanced maternal age was accompanied by low oocyte number (Implantation: 11.7% vs 2.6%, P=0.027; Clinical pregnancy: 18.5% vs 4%, P=0.020).
A significantly higher fertilization rate, a tendency for higher clinical pregnancy rate was found in conventional IVF treatments compared to ICSI. When advanced maternal age was associated with low oocyte number, ICSI resulted in a substantially lower chance of fertilization and clinical pregnancy. These data suggest that ICSI offers no advantage over conventional IVF in terms of fertilization, embryo quality, implantation and pregnancy rates for couples with advanced maternal age or with low oocyte number.
胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)被引入以实现严重男性因素不育症的受精。然而,ICSI 经常用于非男性因素不育症的情况,如高龄或低卵数,但该方法在这些适应症中的临床获益尚未得到证实。
在 2018 年至 2020 年期间,在一所大学诊所进行了一项前瞻性随机研究。≥40 岁和/或≤4 个非严重男性因素不育的卵母细胞的患者被随机分为常规 IVF 或 ICSI 组。比较受精率、胚胎质量、着床、临床妊娠和活产率。
共涉及 336 个 IVF 周期(169 个常规 IVF 和 167 个 ICSI)。常规 IVF 组的受精率高于 ICSI 组(IVF:61.7%,ICSI:53.4%,P=0.001)。胚胎发育和形态在两组之间没有明显差异。常规 IVF 组的着床率、临床妊娠率和活产率分别为 13.1%、24.3%和 11.4%,ICSI 组分别为 10.4%、19.0%和 12.0%。差异无统计学意义。亚组分析显示,高龄伴低卵数时,常规 IVF 的临床结局明显更好(着床:11.7% vs 2.6%,P=0.027;临床妊娠:18.5% vs 4%,P=0.020)。
与 ICSI 相比,常规 IVF 治疗的受精率显著更高,临床妊娠率也有升高的趋势。当高龄与低卵数相关时,ICSI 导致受精和临床妊娠的机会显著降低。这些数据表明,对于高龄或低卵数的夫妇,ICSI 在受精、胚胎质量、着床和妊娠率方面并不优于常规 IVF。