• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者使用头孢地尔治疗的结局:一项多中心观察性研究。

Outcome of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections treated with cefiderocol: A multicenter observational study.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine - Infectious Diseases Unit. University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli-Unit of Infectious and Transplant Medicine, AORN Ospedali dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Infect Public Health. 2023 Sep;16(9):1485-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.009
PMID:37349243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No clear evidence supports the use of cefiderocol as first line treatment in A. baumannii infections.

METHODS

We conducted an observational retrospective/prospective multicenter study including all patients> 18 years with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infections treated with cefiderocol, from June 12021 to October 30 2022. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, secondary end-points the clinical and microbiological response at 7 days and at the end of treatment. Furthermore, we compared the clinical and microbiological outcomes among patients who received cefiderocol in monotherapy or in combination.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients with forty episodes of infection were included [mean age 65 years (SD+16.3), 75% males, 90% with hospital-acquired infections and 70% showing sepsis or septic shock]. The most common infections included unknown source or catheter-related bacteremia (45%) and pneumonia (40%). We observed at 7 days and at the end of therapy a rate of microbiological failure of 20% and 10%, respectively, and of clinical failure of 47.5% and 32.5%, respectively; the 30-day mortality rate was 47.5%. At multivariate analysis clinical failure at 7 days of treatment was the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality. Comparing monotherapy (used in 72.5%) vs. combination therapy (used in 27.5%), no differences were observed in mortality (51.7 vs 45.5%) and clinical (41.4 vs 63.7%) or microbiological failure (24.1 vs 9.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study reinforce the effectiveness of cefiderocol in CRAB infections, also as monotherapy. However, prospective multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and a control group treated with standard of care are needed to identify the best treatment for CRAB infections.

摘要

背景

目前尚无明确证据支持将头孢他啶-阿维巴坦作为鲍曼不动杆菌感染的一线治疗药物。

方法

我们开展了一项观察性回顾性/前瞻性多中心研究,纳入了 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 10 月期间所有接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗的年龄>18 岁、耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)感染患者。主要终点为 30 天死亡率,次要终点为治疗第 7 天和治疗结束时的临床和微生物学应答。此外,我们比较了接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦单药治疗和联合治疗患者的临床和微生物学结局。

结果

共纳入 38 例患者的 40 例感染[平均年龄 65 岁(标准差+16.3),75%为男性,90%为医院获得性感染,70%存在脓毒症或感染性休克]。最常见的感染包括不明来源或导管相关菌血症(45%)和肺炎(40%)。我们观察到治疗第 7 天和治疗结束时,微生物学失败率分别为 20%和 10%,临床失败率分别为 47.5%和 32.5%;30 天死亡率为 47.5%。多变量分析显示,治疗第 7 天临床失败是 30 天死亡率的唯一独立预测因素。在比较单药治疗(72.5%)与联合治疗(27.5%)时,死亡率(51.7% vs 45.5%)、临床(41.4% vs 63.7%)或微生物学失败率(24.1% vs 9.1%)均无差异。

结论

本研究结果强化了头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗 CRAB 感染的有效性,单药治疗同样有效。然而,仍需开展更大样本量、以标准治疗为对照的前瞻性多中心研究,以确定治疗 CRAB 感染的最佳方案。

相似文献

1
Outcome of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections treated with cefiderocol: A multicenter observational study.碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者使用头孢地尔治疗的结局:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2023 Sep;16(9):1485-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
2
Clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during the COVID-19 era: a single center, observational study.在 COVID-19 时代,头孢地尔治疗耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的临床疗效:一项单中心、观察性研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jun;43(6):1149-1160. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04833-8. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Intravenous fosfomycin for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A multi-centre clinical experience.静脉注射磷霉素治疗碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌引起的严重感染:多中心临床经验。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Jul;64(1):107190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107190. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
4
Cefiderocol either in monotherapy or combination versus best available therapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢地尔在碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌感染中的单药治疗或联合治疗与最佳可用治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2024 Mar;88(3):106113. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
5
Efficacy and safety of cefiderocol or best available therapy for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CREDIBLE-CR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, pathogen-focused, descriptive, phase 3 trial.头孢地尔罗或最佳现有治疗方案治疗碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起的严重感染的疗效和安全性(CREDIBLE-CR):一项随机、开放标签、多中心、以病原体为重点、描述性的 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):226-240. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30796-9. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
6
Comparison of cefiderocol and colistin-based regimens for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.比较头孢地尔和多粘菌素为基础的方案治疗碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌引起的严重感染:系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09899-5.
7
Clinical efficacy of cefiderocol-based regimens in patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review with meta-analysis.头孢地尔洛为基础的方案在治疗碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者的临床疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Feb;63(2):107047. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.107047. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
8
Cefiderocol- Compared to Colistin-Based Regimens for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.头孢地尔罗与多粘菌素联合方案治疗碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌引起的严重感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 May 17;66(5):e0214221. doi: 10.1128/aac.02142-21. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
9
Induced Heteroresistance in Carbapenem-Resistant (CRAB) via Exposure to Human Pleural Fluid (HPF) and Its Impact on Cefiderocol Susceptibility.诱导耐碳青霉烯类抗生素鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)异质性耐药及其对头孢地尔洛敏感性的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 21;24(14):11752. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411752.
10
Should we, and how to, optimize cefiderocol administration during severe nosocomial pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii? A viewpoint.我们是否应该以及如何优化碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌引起的严重医院获得性肺炎时的头孢地尔的给药方案?一种观点。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Sep;38:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.05.014. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL)-Producing Acinetobacter Clinical Isolates: A Systematic Review.产金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)的不动杆菌临床分离株的全球流行病学及抗菌药物耐药性:一项系统评价
Pathogens. 2025 Jun 3;14(6):557. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14060557.
2
Real-life impact of cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections (CRAb): a narrative review.头孢地尔对耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌感染(CRAB)的实际影响:一项叙述性综述。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03866-y.
3
Multidrug-Resistant : Risk Factors for Mortality in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.
多重耐药:三级护理教学医院中死亡率的风险因素
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 6;10(1):15. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10010015.
4
Efficiency of combination therapy versus monotherapy for the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.联合治疗与单一疗法治疗耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌感染的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;13(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02695-x.
5
Effectiveness and Safety of Cefiderocol in Clinical Practice for Treatment of Patients with Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: US Interim Results of the PROVE Study.头孢地尔在治疗革兰氏阴性菌感染患者临床实践中的有效性和安全性:PROVE研究的美国中期结果
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Oct 15;17:4427-4443. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S475462. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparison of cefiderocol and colistin-based regimens for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.比较头孢地尔和多粘菌素为基础的方案治疗碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌引起的严重感染:系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09899-5.
7
Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study.头孢地尔在成年患者中的应用:一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究的描述性分析
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Sep;13(9):1929-1948. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01016-y. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
8
Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the Italian council for the optimization of antimicrobial use.腹腔内感染的管理:意大利抗菌药物优化使用理事会的建议。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun 8;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00551-w.
9
Treatment-emergent cefiderocol resistance in carbapenem-resistant is associated with insertion sequence IS in the siderophore receptor .碳青霉烯类耐药 中治疗期出现的头孢他啶耐药与铁载体受体中的插入序列 IS 有关。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Jul 9;68(7):e0029024. doi: 10.1128/aac.00290-24. Epub 2024 May 29.
10
Cefiderocol and Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant .头孢地尔和舒巴坦-度洛巴坦治疗耐碳青霉烯类感染
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;12(12):1729. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12121729.