Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Clinic of Trauma Surgery, Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6295-6303. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04932-9. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
Differentiating the anatomical variations of the anterosuperior portion of the glenoid labrum from pathologies is important to avoid unnecessary iatrogenic complications resulting from inaccurate diagnosis. Additionally, the presence of several variations was reported to be conductive to lesions involving the glenoid labrum. Thus, the aim of this study was to state the prevalence rates of the sublabral recess, sublabral foramen, and the Buford complex, and to verify their association with labral lesions.
Systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to gain potentially eligible literature. Suitable studies were selected in a two-round screening, and relevant data were subsequently extracted. Calculation of the pooled prevalence estimates, including sub-analyses on cohort size, study type, and geographical variance, was conducted. Pooled analysis of risk ratios (RR) was used to assess the conductive nature of the discussed variants to superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions.
The screening resulted in selection of 20 studies investigating the morphological features of the glenoid labrum, consisting of 7601 upper limbs. On the bases of random-effects meta-analysis the sublabral recess, sublabral foramen and Buford complex occur with a pooled prevalence of 57.2% (95% CI 30.0-84.4%), 13.5% (95% CI 8.2-18.9%), and 3.0% (95% CI 1.5-4.5), respectively. Moreover, individuals with Buford complex have RR 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-4.7) of developing SLAP lesions, especially type II (95.5%; 95% CI 86.1-100%), whereas such risk for sublabral recess and sublabral foramen was not statistically significant.
Morphological variants of the glenoid labrum posing diagnostic confusion are frequently observed. Gradually, the Buford complex may be a predisposing factor for sustaining a SLAP lesion.
将肩盂前上唇解剖变异与病变区分开来对于避免因误诊而导致的不必要的医源性并发症非常重要。此外,据报道,存在多种变异与肩盂唇病变有关。因此,本研究旨在阐述肩盂前下隐窝、肩盂下孔和 Buford 复合体的发生率,并验证它们与唇状病变的相关性。
系统地检索电子数据库以获取潜在的合格文献。通过两轮筛选选择合适的研究,并随后提取相关数据。计算了包括队列大小、研究类型和地理差异的亚分析在内的汇总患病率估计值。使用风险比 (RR) 的汇总分析来评估所讨论的变异对前上盂唇后下损伤 (SLAP) 病变的易感性。
筛选结果选择了 20 项研究,这些研究调查了肩盂唇的形态特征,共涉及 7601 个上肢。基于随机效应荟萃分析,肩盂前下隐窝、肩盂下孔和 Buford 复合体的总体患病率分别为 57.2%(95%CI 30.0-84.4%)、13.5%(95%CI 8.2-18.9%)和 3.0%(95%CI 1.5-4.5%)。此外,Buford 复合体患者发生 SLAP 病变的 RR 为 2.4(95%CI 1.3-4.7),尤其是 II 型(95.5%;95%CI 86.1-100%),而肩盂前下隐窝和肩盂下孔的这种风险则无统计学意义。
肩盂唇的形态变异常导致诊断混淆。逐渐地,Buford 复合体可能是发生 SLAP 病变的一个易感因素。