• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房患者医疗器械相关压力性损伤的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury in ICU patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gou Ling, Zhang Zhiqin, A Yongde

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, Xining, China.

Intensive Care Unit, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Xining, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287326. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0287326
PMID:37352180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10289390/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical device-related pressure injury (MDRPI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is a serious issue. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for MDRPI associated with ICU patients through systematic review and meta-analysis, and provide insights into the clinical prevention of MDRPI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Database, and China BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) (from inception to January 2023) for studies that identified risk factors of MDRPI in ICU patients. In order to avoid the omission of relevant literature, we performed a secondary search of the above database on February 15, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies involving 4850 participants were selected to analyze risk factors for MDRPI in ICU patients. While conducting a meta-analysis, we used sensitivity analysis to ensure the reliability of the results for cases with significant heterogeneity among studies. When the source of heterogeneity cannot be determined, we only described the risk factor. The risk factors for MDRPI in ICU patients were elder age (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.10), diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.96-5.21), edema (OR = 3.62, 95% CI: 2.31-5.67), lower Braden scale score (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.11-1.33), higher SOFA score (OR = 4.21, 95%CI: 2.38-7.47), higher APACHE II score (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.15-1.64), longer usage time of medical devices (OR = 1.11, 95%CI: 1.05-1.19), use of vasoconstrictors (OR = 6.07, 95%CI: 3.15-11.69), surgery (OR = 4.36, 95% CI: 2.07-9.15), prone position (OR = 24.71, 95% CI: 7.34-83.15), and prone position ventilation (OR = 17.51, 95% CI: 5.86-52.36). Furthermore, we found that ICU patients who used subglottic suction catheters had a higher risk of MDRPI, whereas ICU patients with higher hemoglobin and serum albumin levels had a lower risk of MDRPI.

CONCLUSION

This study reported the risk factors for MDRPI in ICU patients. A comprehensive analysis of these risk factors will help to prevent and optimize interventions, thereby minimizing the occurrence of MDRPI.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)患者发生的与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤(MDRPI)是一个严重问题。我们旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析评估ICU患者发生MDRPI的危险因素,并为MDRPI的临床预防提供见解。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)(从创刊至2023年1月),以查找确定ICU患者MDRPI危险因素的研究。为避免遗漏相关文献,我们于2023年2月15日对上述数据库进行了二次检索。使用Revman 5.3进行荟萃分析。

结果

选取15项涉及4850名参与者的研究,分析ICU患者发生MDRPI的危险因素。在进行荟萃分析时,我们使用敏感性分析以确保研究间存在显著异质性情况下结果的可靠性。当无法确定异质性来源时,我们仅描述危险因素。ICU患者发生MDRPI的危险因素包括年龄较大(OR = 1.06,95%CI:1.03 - 1.10)、糖尿病(OR = 3.20,95%CI:1.96 - 5.21)、水肿(OR = 3.62,95%CI:2.31 - 5.67)、Braden量表评分较低(OR = 1.22,95%CI:1.11 - 1.33)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分较高(OR = 4.21,95%CI:2.38 - 7.47)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分较高(OR = 1.38,95%CI:1.15 - 1.64)、医疗器械使用时间较长(OR = 1.11,95%CI:1.05 - 1.19)、使用血管收缩剂(OR = 6.07,95%CI:3.15 - 11.69)、手术(OR = 4.36,95%CI:2.07 - 9.15)、俯卧位(OR = 24.71,95%CI:7.34 - 83.15)以及俯卧位通气(OR = 17.51,95%CI:5.86 - 52.36)。此外,我们发现使用声门下吸引导管的ICU患者发生MDRPI的风险较高,而血红蛋白和血清白蛋白水平较高的ICU患者发生MDRPI的风险较低。

结论

本研究报告了ICU患者发生MDRPI的危险因素。对这些危险因素进行综合分析将有助于预防和优化干预措施,从而最大限度减少MDRPI的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/52e75f6f34ef/pone.0287326.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/672e12e8f698/pone.0287326.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/9065c74ce6e6/pone.0287326.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/922ffaff52f5/pone.0287326.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/1ee9fe4dde87/pone.0287326.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/59ed30e89aa5/pone.0287326.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/f2a63aa81f41/pone.0287326.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/025150581dec/pone.0287326.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/34d99d7ffd79/pone.0287326.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/4588a6a0e4a2/pone.0287326.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/7df43d178962/pone.0287326.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/4788d6e6b252/pone.0287326.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/52e75f6f34ef/pone.0287326.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/672e12e8f698/pone.0287326.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/9065c74ce6e6/pone.0287326.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/922ffaff52f5/pone.0287326.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/1ee9fe4dde87/pone.0287326.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/59ed30e89aa5/pone.0287326.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/f2a63aa81f41/pone.0287326.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/025150581dec/pone.0287326.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/34d99d7ffd79/pone.0287326.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/4588a6a0e4a2/pone.0287326.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/7df43d178962/pone.0287326.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/4788d6e6b252/pone.0287326.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2886/10289390/52e75f6f34ef/pone.0287326.g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury in ICU patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房患者医疗器械相关压力性损伤的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287326. eCollection 2023.
2
Risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care units.重症监护病房医疗器械相关性压力损伤的危险因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 May;31(9-10):1174-1183. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15974. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
3
Determining the incidence and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care patients.确定重症监护患者中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤的发生率及危险因素。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 Nov;32(4):596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
4
Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in an Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study.医疗器械相关性压力损伤在重症监护病房中的横断面研究。
Wound Manag Prev. 2021 Nov;67(11):26-32.
5
Determination of Incidence and Risk Factors of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in the ICU: A Descriptive Study.医疗器械相关性压力性损伤在 ICU 中的发生率及危险因素的确定:一项描述性研究。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2024 Mar 1;37(3):1-6. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000113.
6
Medical Device-Related Pressure injuries in adult intensive care units.成人重症监护病房与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3863-3873. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16516. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
7
Model construction of factors influencing intensive care unit nurses' medical device-related pressure injury knowledge, attitude, and practice.影响重症监护病房护士医疗器械相关压力性损伤知识、态度和实践因素的模型构建。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2582-2593. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14129. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
8
Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries: a meta-analysis.医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Aug 19;29(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01986-2.
9
Prevalence, severity, and characteristics of medical device related pressure injuries in adult intensive care patients: A prospective observational study.成人重症监护病房中与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤的患病率、严重程度和特征:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int Wound J. 2023 Jan;20(1):109-119. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13845. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Incidence, characteristics and risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries: An observational cohort study.医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率、特征及危险因素:一项观察性队列研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Apr;69:103180. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103180. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Content Validity of a Modified Italian Version of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for ICU Patients.杰克逊/库宾重症监护病房患者压力性损伤风险评估量表改良意大利语版的翻译、文化调适及内容效度
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(7):256. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070256.
2
Assessing the efficacy of ultrasound deep tissue evaluation in predicting hospital-acquired pressure injuries: A diagnostic study.评估超声深部组织评估在预测医院获得性压力性损伤中的有效性:一项诊断性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 11;104(28):e43268. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043268.
3
Construction and validation of a predictive model for the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries in the maxillofacial region in patients undergoing surgery in the prone position.

本文引用的文献

1
Vasoconstrictor Agent Administration as a Risk Factor for Pressure Injury Development in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管收缩剂药物的使用与 ICU 患者压疮发生风险的相关性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2023 Oct;12(10):560-573. doi: 10.1089/wound.2022.0081. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
The Prognostic Accuracy Evaluation of mNUTRIC, APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS 2 Scores for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Sepsis.mNUTRIC、APACHE II、SOFA和SAPS 2评分对脓毒症患者死亡率预测的预后准确性评估
Crit Care Res Pract. 2022 Oct 13;2022:4666594. doi: 10.1155/2022/4666594. eCollection 2022.
3
俯卧位手术患者颌面部术中获得性压力性损伤风险预测模型的构建与验证
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03024-2.
4
Incidence of pressure injury in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.中重度创伤性脑损伤患者压力性损伤的发生率:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e089243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089243.
5
Intensive care nurses' knowledge and practices regarding medical device-related pressure injuries: A descriptive cross-sectional study.重症监护护士医疗器械相关性压力性损伤知识和实践的描述性横断面研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70088. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70088.
6
Characteristics of oral mucosal pressure injuries in children with orotracheal intubation in intensive care units: An observational study.重症监护病房中经口气管插管儿童口腔黏膜压力性损伤的特征:一项观察性研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13174. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13174. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries: a meta-analysis.医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Aug 19;29(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01986-2.
8
Adverse device reaction: Chin decubitus.器械不良反应:颏部褥疮。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Mar;24(3):322-323. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14831. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
Medical Device-Related Pressure injuries in adult intensive care units.
成人重症监护病房与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3863-3873. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16516. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
Incidence and characteristics of hospital-acquired mucous membrane pressure injury: A five-year analysis.医院获得性黏膜压力性损伤的发生率和特征:五年分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3810-3819. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16473. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Evaluation of Vasopressor Dose and the Incidence of Pressure Injuries in Critically Ill Patients.危重症患者血管升压药剂量与压力性损伤发生率的评估
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022 Oct 1;35(10):550-554. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000833604.12023.71. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
6
Patient and carer experience of living with a pressure injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.患者和照护者在压力性损伤中的生活体验:定性研究的元综合。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3233-3247. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16431. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
7
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Depression in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in China.中国2型糖尿病患者抑郁症患病率及危险因素的系统评价与Meta分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 10;9:759499. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.759499. eCollection 2022.
8
Pressure injuries in Australian public hospitals: A cost of illness study.澳大利亚公立医院的压疮:一项疾病成本研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jun;130:104191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104191. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
9
Prognostic Value of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in Critically-Ill Combat-Injured Patients.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对危重症战创伤患者预后的评估价值。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;37(11):1426-1434. doi: 10.1177/08850666221078196. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
Characteristics and risk factors of nasal mucosal pressure injury in intensive care units.重症监护病房鼻黏膜压力性损伤的特征及危险因素
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):346-356. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16193. Epub 2022 Jan 8.