Early versus late weight-bearing in operatively treated ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND

Over the past 30 years, several studies have compared early weight-bearing versus late weight-bearing following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures; however, no review strictly including patients with ankle fractures and complete syndesmotic disruption has been performed.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to compare early versus late weight-bearing following surgery for ankle fracture with syndesmotic injury regarding clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was applied to the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed databases from their inception to the 17th of January 2022. The articles were screened independently by two blinded reviewers. Data were extracted by one author, then cross-checked and approved by the other.

RESULTS

No comparative studies were found; therefore, studies describing either early or late weight-bearing were included. It was thus not possible to perform a meta-analysis. 11 studies and 751 patients were included. An early partial weight-bearing protocol was used in three studies (253 patients) and late in eight studies (498 patients). Functional outcomes suggested that there were no clear differences between early partial weight-bearing and late weight-bearing. The reoperation rate was 9-31% in the early group and 0-11% in the late. Similar results were seen for loss of syndesmotic reduction, malreduction, infection, and fixation failure.

CONCLUSION

Pros and cons were reported for early partial weight-bearing and late weight-bearing, but the evidence was very limited as our results were based on noncomparative studies. In the future, high-quality comparative studies focusing on functional outcomes within 6 months postoperatively are needed.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE