Suppr超能文献

停止婴儿汽车座椅耐受筛查与早产儿出院后不良结局

Discontinuation of Car Seat Tolerance Screening and Postdischarge Adverse Outcomes in Infants Born Preterm.

机构信息

Department of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA; Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA.

Women and Children's Services Institute, Providence Health System, Portland, OR.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2023 Oct;261:113577. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113577. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the association between discontinuing predischarge car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) with 30-day postdischarge adverse outcomes in infants born preterm.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study involving all infants born preterm from 2010 through 2021 who survived to discharge to home in a 14-hospital integrated health care system. The exposure was discontinuation of CSTS. The primary outcome was a composite rate of death, 911 call-triggered transports, or readmissions associated with diagnostic codes of respiratory disorders, apnea, apparent life-threatening event, or brief resolved unexplained events within 30 days of discharge. Outcomes of infants born in the periods of CSTS and after discontinuation were compared.

RESULTS

Twelve of 14 hospitals initially utilized CSTS and contributed patients to the CSTS period; 71.4% of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients and 26.9% of non-NICU infants were screened. All hospitals participated in the discontinuation period; 0.1% was screened. Rates of the unadjusted primary outcome were 1.02% in infants in the CSTS period (n = 21 122) and 1.06% after discontinuation (n = 20 142) (P = .76). The aOR (95% CI) was 0.95 (0.75, 1.19). Statistically insignificant differences between periods were observed in components of the primary outcome, gestational age strata, NICU admission status groups, and other secondary analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of CSTS in a large integrated health care network was not associated with a change in 30-day postdischarge adverse outcomes. CSTS's value as a standard predischarge assessment deserves further evaluation.

摘要

目的

研究提前出院时停止汽车座椅耐受性筛查(CSTS)与早产儿出院后 30 天内不良结局之间的关系。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2010 年至 2021 年间在 14 家综合医疗保健系统中存活至出院回家的所有早产儿。暴露因素是停止 CSTS。主要结局是出院后 30 天内与呼吸障碍、呼吸暂停、明显威胁生命事件或短暂性不明原因事件诊断代码相关的死亡、911 呼叫触发转运或再入院的复合率。比较 CSTS 期和停止 CSTS 后出生的婴儿的结局。

结果

最初有 14 家医院中的 12 家使用 CSTS,并为 CSTS 期提供了患者;新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)患者中有 71.4%和非 NICU 婴儿中有 26.9%接受了筛查。所有医院都参与了停止期,只有 0.1%接受了筛查。CSTS 期(n=21 122)和停止后(n=20 142)的未调整主要结局发生率分别为 1.02%和 1.06%(P=0.76)。调整后的比值比(95%CI)为 0.95(0.75,1.19)。主要结局的各个组成部分、胎龄分层、NICU 入院状态组和其他次要分析中,两个时期之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在大型综合医疗保健网络中停止 CSTS 与出院后 30 天内不良结局无变化相关。CSTS 作为一种标准的出院前评估方法的价值值得进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验