Suppr超能文献

单阶段腹横筋膜后入路网片修补术在造口还纳术中的应用:我们是否越界了?ACHQC 分析。

Single-staged retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh at the time of ostomy reversal: are we crossing the line? An ACHQC Analysis.

机构信息

Center for Abdominal Core Health, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Crile Building, 10th Floor, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7051-7059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10176-w. Epub 2023 Jun 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The most appropriate method of reconstructing the abdominal wall at the site of a simultaneous stoma takedown is controversial. The contaminated field, concomitant GI procedure being performed and presence of a hernia all complicate decision-making. We sought to describe the surgical approaches, mesh type and outcomes of concomitant abdominal wall reconstruction during stoma takedown in a large hernia registry.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

All patients who underwent stoma takedown with simultaneous hernia repair with retromuscular mesh placement from January 2014 to May 2022 were identified within the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). Patients were stratified by mesh type including permanent synthetic (PS), resorbable synthetic (RS) and biologic mesh. Association of mesh type with 30-day wound events and other complications and 1-year outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 368 patients who met inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine patients had ileostomies, 276 colostomies and 3 had both. Two hundred and seventy-nine (75.8%) patients received PS mesh, 46 (12.5%) biologic, and 43 (11.7%) RS. Seventy percent (259/368) had a parastomal hernia, 75% (285/368) had a midline incisional hernia, and 48% (178/368) had both. All groups had similar preoperative comorbidities and the majority had a transversus abdominus release. All mesh groups had similar thirty-day SSI (13.2-14.3%), SSO (10.5-17.8%) and SSOPI (7.9-14.1%), p = 0.6. Three patients with PS mesh developed infected synthetic mesh and one PS mesh required excision. Four patients with PS developed an enterocutaneous fistula. Of these, only one patient was recorded as having both an enterocutaneous fistula and mesh infection. Thirty-day reoperation and readmission were similar across all mesh groups. Recurrence at 1-year was similar between mesh groups. Quality of life measured using HerQLes scores were higher at one year compared to baseline in all groups indicating improvement in hernia-specific quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Early complication rates associated with simultaneous stoma takedown and abdominal wall reconstruction are significant, regardless of mesh type utilized. Concomitant surgery should be weighed heavily and tailored to individual patients.

摘要

简介

同时进行造口关闭和腹壁重建的最佳方法存在争议。污染区域、同时进行的胃肠程序以及疝的存在都使决策变得复杂。我们试图在一个大型疝登记处描述在造口关闭时同时进行腹壁重建的手术方法、网片类型和结果。

方法和程序

在 Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) 中,确定了 2014 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月期间同时接受肌后网片修补的造口关闭和疝修复的所有患者。根据网片类型(永久性合成材料[PS]、可吸收合成材料[RS]和生物材料)对患者进行分层。评估网片类型与 30 天伤口事件和其他并发症以及 1 年结果的关系。

结果

符合纳入标准的患者有 368 例。89 例患者行回肠造口术,276 例行结肠造口术,3 例同时行两种造口术。279 例(75.8%)患者接受 PS 网片,46 例(12.5%)接受生物材料网片,43 例(11.7%)接受 RS 网片。70%(259/368)的患者有造口旁疝,75%(285/368)有中线切口疝,48%(178/368)有两者。所有组的术前合并症相似,大多数患者接受了腹横肌松解术。所有网片组的 30 天 SSI(13.2-14.3%)、SSO(10.5-17.8%)和 SSOPI(7.9-14.1%)相似,p=0.6。3 例 PS 网片患者发生感染性合成网片,1 例 PS 网片需要切除。4 例 PS 患者发生肠外瘘。其中,只有 1 例患者记录为肠外瘘和网片感染并存。所有网片组 30 天再次手术和再入院率相似。1 年时的复发率在各组之间相似。所有组的 HerQLes 评分均高于基线,表明疝特异性生活质量得到改善。

结论

无论使用何种网片类型,同时进行造口关闭和腹壁重建的早期并发症发生率都很高。应慎重权衡并根据个体患者量身定制同期手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验