• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于社区联盟和外展干预措施以增加弱势群体获得初级保健服务机会的现实主义综述:一项现实主义综述。

Realist review of community coalitions and outreach interventions to increase access to primary care for vulnerable populations: a realist review.

作者信息

Welch Vivian, Pottie Kevin, Gaudet Caroline, Thuku Micere, Mallard Ryan, Spenceley Shannon, Amjed Nida, Wadhwani Arpana, Ghogomu Elizabeth, Scott Cathie, Dahrouge Simone

机构信息

Bruyère Research Institute, Methods Centre, 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada.

Bruyère Research Institute, C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CTLC), 85 Primrose, Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G5, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2023 Jun 24;81(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01105-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13690-023-01105-3
PMID:37353828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10290300/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are meaningful gaps in equitable access to Primary Health Care (PHC), especially for vulnerable populations after widespread reforms in Western countries. The Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) research program is a Canadian-Australian collaboration that aims to improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations. Relationships were developed with stakeholders in six regions across Canada and Australia where access-related needs could be identified. The most promising interventions would be implemented and tested to address the needs identified. This realist review was conducted to understand how community coalition and outreach (e.g., mobile or pop-up) services improve access for underserved vulnerable residents.

OBJECTIVE

To inform the development and delivery of an innovative intervention to increase access to PHC for vulnerable populations.

METHODS

A realist review was conducted in collaboration with the Local Innovative Partnership (LIP) research team and the IMPACT research members who conducted the review. We performed an initial comprehensive systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library up to October 19, 2015, and updated it on August 8, 2020. Studies were included if they focused on interventions to improve access to PHC using community coalition, outreach services or mobile delivery methods. We included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), and systematic reviews. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used for data extraction and framework analysis to obtain themes. The LIP research team was also allowed to suggest additional papers not included at screening.

RESULTS

We included 43 records, comprising 31 RCTs, 11 systematic reviews, and 1 case control study that was added by the LIP research team. We identified three main themes of PHC interventions to promote access for vulnerable residents, including: 1) tailoring of materials and services decreases barriers to primary health care, 2) services offered where vulnerable populations gather increases the "reach" of the interventions, 3) partnerships and collaborations lead to positive health outcomes. In addition, implementation designs and reporting elements should be considered.

CONCLUSION

Realist reviews can help guide the development of locally adapted primary health care interventions.

摘要

背景

在西方国家广泛改革后,初级卫生保健(PHC)的公平可及性存在显著差距,尤其是对弱势群体而言。促进医疗服务可及性转变的创新模式(IMPACT)研究项目是加拿大和澳大利亚的合作项目,旨在改善弱势群体获得初级卫生保健的机会。该项目与加拿大和澳大利亚六个地区的利益相关者建立了联系,在这些地区可以确定与可及性相关的需求。将实施和测试最有前景的干预措施,以满足所确定的需求。进行这项实证性综述是为了了解社区联盟和外展(如移动或临时搭建)服务如何改善服务不足的弱势居民的可及性。

目的

为开发和提供创新干预措施提供信息,以增加弱势群体获得初级卫生保健的机会。

方法

与当地创新伙伴关系(LIP)研究团队和进行该综述的IMPACT研究成员合作进行了一项实证性综述。我们于2015年10月19日之前使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆进行了初步的全面系统检索,并于2020年8月8日进行了更新。如果研究侧重于使用社区联盟、外展服务或移动提供方式来改善初级卫生保健可及性的干预措施,则将其纳入。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和系统综述。由两名独立评审员对研究进行筛选,并使用可及性、有效性、采用率、实施情况和维持情况(RE-AIM)框架进行数据提取和框架分析,以获取主题。LIP研究团队也可以建议在筛选时未纳入的其他论文。

结果

我们纳入了43条记录,包括31项随机对照试验、11项系统综述和LIP研究团队补充的1项病例对照研究。我们确定了促进弱势居民获得初级卫生保健的干预措施的三个主要主题,包括:1)根据具体情况调整材料和服务可减少初级卫生保健的障碍,2)在弱势群体聚集的地方提供服务可增加干预措施的“可及范围”,3)伙伴关系和合作可带来积极的健康结果。此外,应考虑实施设计和报告要素。

结论

实证性综述有助于指导因地制宜的初级卫生保健干预措施的开发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edb/10290300/b93588cf6403/13690_2023_1105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edb/10290300/1a4c4289ecce/13690_2023_1105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edb/10290300/b93588cf6403/13690_2023_1105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edb/10290300/1a4c4289ecce/13690_2023_1105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edb/10290300/b93588cf6403/13690_2023_1105_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Realist review of community coalitions and outreach interventions to increase access to primary care for vulnerable populations: a realist review.关于社区联盟和外展干预措施以增加弱势群体获得初级保健服务机会的现实主义综述:一项现实主义综述。
Arch Public Health. 2023 Jun 24;81(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01105-3.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Equity of access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations: the IMPACT international online survey of innovations.弱势群体获得初级医疗保健的公平性:IMPACT国际创新在线调查
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Apr 12;15:64. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0351-7.
6
Organizational interventions improving access to community-based primary health care for vulnerable populations: a scoping review.改善弱势群体获得社区初级卫生保健机会的组织干预措施:一项范围综述
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Oct 10;15(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0459-9.
7
Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.青少年重复意外怀孕干预消除计划(INTERUPT):干预效果与成本效益的系统评价,以及实施因素和用户参与的定性与实在论综合分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(16):1-214. doi: 10.3310/hta20160.
8
Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions.改善澳大利亚和加拿大弱势群体获得初级卫生保健的机会:对六项复杂干预措施进行混合方法评估的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e027869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027869.
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The involvement of non-governmental organisations in achieving health system goals based on the WHO six building blocks: A scoping review on global evidence.非政府组织基于世界卫生组织的六大要素在实现卫生系统目标方面的参与:一项关于全球证据的范围审查
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0315592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315592. eCollection 2025.
2
Aggregation of cardiovascular risk factors in a cohort of 40-year-olds participating in a population-based health screening program in Sweden.瑞典一项基于人群的健康筛查项目中40岁人群心血管危险因素的聚集情况。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 28;82(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01457-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Does healthcare inequity reflect variations in peoples' abilities to access healthcare? Results from a multi-jurisdictional interventional study in two high-income countries.卫生保健不公平是否反映了人们获得卫生保健能力的差异?来自两个高收入国家的多司法管辖区干预性研究的结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 25;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01281-6.
2
Engagement interventions delivered in primary care to improve off-site pediatric mental health service initiation: A systematic review.在初级保健中实施的参与干预措施,以改善场外儿科精神卫生服务的启动:系统评价。
Fam Syst Health. 2020 Sep;38(3):310-322. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000521. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
3
Outreach work in Belgian primary care practices during COVID-19: results from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study.
在 COVID-19 期间开展的比利时初级保健实践中的外展工作:来自 PRICOV-19 研究的横断面研究结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 3;24(Suppl 1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02323-6.
Improved diabetes control among low-income Mexican Americans through community-clinical interventions: results of an RCT.
通过社区-临床干预改善低收入墨西哥裔美国人的糖尿病控制:一项随机对照试验的结果
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000867.
4
A Multilevel Diabetes and CVD Risk Reduction Intervention in African American Churches: Project Faith Influencing Transformation (FIT) Feasibility and Outcomes.一项在非裔美国教堂中进行的多层次糖尿病和心血管疾病风险降低干预措施:信仰影响转型计划(FIT)的可行性和结果。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Dec;7(6):1160-1171. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00740-8. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Intervention to reduce perceived loneliness in community-dwelling older people.干预措施以减少社区居住的老年人的孤独感。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Jun;35(2):366-374. doi: 10.1111/scs.12852. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
6
Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People.社区到诊所导航干预对弱势群体结直肠癌筛查的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Apr 20;54(5):308-319. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz049.
7
Effect of a Community Agency-Administered Nurse Home Visitation Program on Program Use and Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区机构管理的护士家访计划对项目使用和母婴健康结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914522. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14522.
8
Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions.改善澳大利亚和加拿大弱势群体获得初级卫生保健的机会:对六项复杂干预措施进行混合方法评估的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e027869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027869.
9
Using Collaborative Coalition Processes to Advance Community Health, Well-Being, and Equity: A Multiple-Case Study Analysis From a National Community Transformation Initiative.运用协作联盟流程促进社区健康、福祉与公平:一项来自国家社区转型倡议的多案例研究分析
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;46(1_suppl):100S-109S. doi: 10.1177/1090198119838833. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
10
Improving engagement with healthcare in hepatitis C: a randomised controlled trial of a peer support intervention.提高丙型肝炎患者对医疗保健的参与度:一项同伴支持干预的随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2019 Apr 1;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1300-2.