• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下髋关节撞击综合征手术中,关节囊周围神经群阻滞可使术后 18 至 24 小时的疼痛得到小但一致的缓解:一项前瞻性、随机对照临床试验。

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Leads to Small but Consistent Reductions in Pain Between 18 and 24 Hours Postoperatively in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

机构信息

ARCUS Sportklinik, Pforzheim, Germany.

MVZ Praxisklinik Orthopädie Aachen, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.016
PMID:37355181
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the use of a pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block would reduce perioperative pain after arthroscopic therapy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to examine opioid requirements and occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

METHODS

Between May 2022 and October 2022, patients (N = 68) undergoing arthroscopic surgery for FAIS were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The first group received an ultrasound-guided PENG preoperatively with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and standardized postoperative oral medication. The second group received a sham block preoperatively with 20 mL of 0.9% saline and standardized postoperative oral medication. The primary end point was pain scores (visual analog score [VAS], 0-10) during the first 24 hours postoperatively. To quantify clinical significance of outcome achievement for the VAS pain score, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using the half standard deviation method. The incidence of PONV as well as opioid usage (converted to morphine equivalent) within the first 24 hours were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Randomization and permission were successfully obtained from 68 participants. From the fifteenth postoperative hour, the PENG group reported significantly less postoperative pain than the control group (24th postoperative hour: VAS pain PENG group 1.3 ± 0.9 [0-3]; 95% confidence interval {CI} 0.4-1.2 vs the VAS pain control group 2.4 ± 1.6 [0-5]; 95% CI 1.4-4.7; P = .009). The VAS pain score threshold for achieving the MCID at 24 hours postoperative was defined as a decrease of 1.1. 27 patients (79%) in the PENG group and 22 patients (65%) in the control group were able to achieve MCID (P = .009). Opioid dosage and postoperative nausea did not differ significantly between groups (P = .987 and P = .655, respectively). Concomitant complications such as falls, hematomas, or weakened muscles did not occur in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this study, a PENG block minimally reduced pain after arthroscopic treatment for FAIS between the 18th and 24th postoperative hours. The PENG group achieved significantly more often the pain VAS MCID. However, there was no proof that the PENG group consumed fewer opioids than the control group. Overall, PONV was found at a low and comparable rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

摘要

目的

探讨关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞是否会减少髋关节撞击综合征(FAIS)关节镜治疗后的围手术期疼痛,并检查阿片类药物的需求以及术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的发生情况。

方法

2022 年 5 月至 2022 年 10 月,对 68 例接受 FAIS 关节镜手术的患者进行了随机分组。第一组在术前接受超声引导下的 PENG 阻滞,注射 20 毫升 0.375%罗哌卡因,并给予标准化的术后口服药物。第二组在术前接受假阻滞,注射 20 毫升 0.9%生理盐水,并给予标准化的术后口服药物。主要终点是术后 24 小时内的疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分 [VAS],0-10)。为了量化 VAS 疼痛评分达到临床意义的结果,使用半标准差法计算最小临床重要差异(MCID)。PONV 的发生率以及术后 24 小时内阿片类药物的使用量(换算成吗啡当量)是次要结果。

结果

从 68 名参与者中成功获得了随机化和同意。从术后第 15 小时开始,PENG 组报告的术后疼痛明显少于对照组(术后第 24 小时:PENG 组 VAS 疼痛 1.3±0.9[0-3];95%置信区间 [CI]0.4-1.2 与 VAS 疼痛对照组 2.4±1.6[0-5];95%CI1.4-4.7;P=0.009)。术后 24 小时达到 MCID 的 VAS 疼痛评分阈值定义为降低 1.1。27 名(79%)PENG 组患者和 22 名(65%)对照组患者能够达到 MCID(P=0.009)。两组之间的阿片类药物剂量和术后恶心没有显著差异(P=0.987 和 P=0.655)。两组均未发生跌倒、血肿或肌肉无力等伴随并发症。

结论

根据这项研究,PENG 阻滞可在 FAIS 关节镜治疗后 18 至 24 小时内轻微减轻疼痛。PENG 组更经常达到 VAS 疼痛 MCID。然而,没有证据表明 PENG 组比对照组使用的阿片类药物更少。总体而言,PONV 的发生率较低且相当。

证据水平

I 级,随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Leads to Small but Consistent Reductions in Pain Between 18 and 24 Hours Postoperatively in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.关节镜下髋关节撞击综合征手术中,关节囊周围神经群阻滞可使术后 18 至 24 小时的疼痛得到小但一致的缓解:一项前瞻性、随机对照临床试验。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
The Erector Spinae Plane Block in the Setting of Hip Arthroscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.《髋关节镜手术中竖脊肌平面阻滞的前瞻性随机对照临床试验》
Arthroscopy. 2022 Jan;38(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.012. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Combined With Local Infiltration Analgesia on Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞联合局部浸润镇痛对全髋关节置换术后疼痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1096-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
4
The Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Facia Iliaca Block on Immediate Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption After Hip Arthroscopy Randomized Trial.关节镜髋关节手术后囊周神经群阻滞与股外侧皮神经阻滞对即时术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的疗效:随机试验。
Pain Physician. 2023 Jul;26(4):357-367.
5
Comparison between Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Local Infiltration Analgesia for Postoperative Analgesia after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导关节囊周围神经阻滞与局部浸润镇痛在全髋关节置换术后镇痛效果的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):1839-1846. doi: 10.1111/os.13777. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
6
Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block for Hip Arthroscopy: A Randomized, Triple-Masked Controlled Trial.髋关节镜手术术前股神经阻滞:一项随机、三盲对照试验
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2680-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546515602468. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
7
How Can We Define Clinically Important Improvement in Pain Scores After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征后疼痛评分的临床显著改善如何定义?至少 2 年随访研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3133-3140. doi: 10.1177/0363546519877861. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
8
The Effect of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Refills on Achieving Meaningful Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征术后阿片类药物处方续方对获得有意义的临床结局的影响。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1599-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
9
Improved Pain and Perioperative Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy With the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block.采用关节周围神经组阻滞的髋关节镜检查术后疼痛及围手术期结局改善
Arthroscopy. 2023 Feb;39(2):293-297. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.036. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
10
Defining Meaningful Functional Improvement on the Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.定义髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征 2 年后在满意度方面有意义的视觉模拟量表功能改善。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Mar;36(3):734-742.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.028. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of pericapsular nerve group block in hip arthroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.髋关节镜检查中关节囊周围神经阻滞的临床结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 24;12(3):e70303. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70303. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Conservative Treatment Versus Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Frequentist Meta-Analysis of RCTs.保守治疗与髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的最小临床重要差异:随机对照试验的频率学派Meta分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Sep;17(9):2514-2528. doi: 10.1111/os.70097. Epub 2025 Jul 5.
3
Perioperative Management of Hip Arthroscopy.
髋关节镜手术的围手术期管理
Iowa Orthop J. 2025;45(1):179-186.
4
Conservative treatment versus hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement : a multilevel meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.股骨髋臼撞击症患者的保守治疗与髋关节镜检查:随机对照试验的多水平荟萃分析
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Apr 23;6(4):480-498. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0198.R1.
5
Outcomes and complications of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A narrative review.股骨髋臼撞击综合征髋关节镜手术的结果与并发症:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Oct 29;58:102797. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102797. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Pericapsular nerve group block reduces opioid use and pain after hip surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.关节囊周围神经群阻滞减少髋关节手术后的阿片类药物使用和疼痛:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0310008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310008. eCollection 2024.
7
Retrospective Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum and Pericapsular Nerve Group Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management of Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hip Arthroscopy.腰方肌阻滞与关节周围神经丛阻滞用于门诊髋关节镜手术患者术后疼痛管理的回顾性比较
J Pain Res. 2024 Sep 28;17:3157-3166. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S466694. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparison of the Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.全麻下髋关节镜手术患者采用关节周围神经组阻滞联合股外侧皮神经阻滞及髂筋膜间隙阻滞的效果比较:一项随机双盲试验
J Pain Res. 2024 May 6;17:1651-1661. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S456880. eCollection 2024.
9
Demographic and Socioeconomic Patient Data Are Rarely Included in Randomized Controlled Trials for Femoral Acetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.人口统计学和社会经济患者数据很少纳入股骨髋臼撞击症和髋关节镜检查的随机对照试验:一项系统评价。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 24;6(2):100901. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100901. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
The Addition of a Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Postoperative Pain Control Does Not Result in Less Narcotic Use After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.髋关节镜检查后添加关节周围神经组阻滞用于术后疼痛控制并不会减少麻醉药物的使用:一项系统评价
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 15;6(2):100894. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100894. eCollection 2024 Apr.