Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Eur Urol. 2024 Feb;85(2):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.038. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
The European Association of Urology (EAU) has proposed a risk stratification for patients harboring biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP).
To assess whether this risk stratification helps in choosing patients for salvage radiotherapy (SRT).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analyses of 2379 patients who developed BCR after RP (1989-2020), within ten European high-volume centers, were conducted. Early and late SRT were defined as SRT delivered at prostate-specific antigen values <0.5 and ≥0.5 ng/ml, respectively.
Multivariable Cox models tested the effect of SRT versus no SRT on death and cancer-specific death. The Simon-Makuch method tested for survival differences within each risk group.
Overall, 805 and 1574 patients were classified as having EAU low- and high-risk BCR. The median follow-up was 54 mo after BCR for survivors. For low-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 87% versus 78% (p = 0.2) and cancer-specific survival was 100% versus 96% (p = 0.2) for early versus no SRT. For high-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 81% versus 66% (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival was 98% versus 82% (p < 0.001) for early versus no SRT. In multivariable analyses, early SRT decreased the risk for death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55, p < 0.01) and cancer-specific death (HR: 0.08, p < 0.001). Late SRT was a predictor of cancer-specific death (HR: 0.17, p < 0.01) but not death (p = 0.1).
Improved survival was recorded within the high-risk BCR group for patients treated with early SRT compared with those under observation. Our results suggest recommending early SRT for high-risk BCR men. Conversely, surveillance might be suitable for low-risk BCR, since only nine patients with low-risk BCR died from prostate cancer during follow-up.
The impact of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) on cancer-specific outcomes stratified according to the European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk classification was assessed. While men with high-risk BCR should be offered SRT, surveillance might be a suitable option for those with low-risk BCR.
欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)提出了一种针对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后生化复发(BCR)患者的风险分层。
评估这种风险分层是否有助于选择接受挽救性放疗(SRT)的患者。
设计、设置和参与者:对在十个欧洲大容量中心接受 RP 后发生 BCR 的 2379 例患者(1989-2020 年)进行了分析。早期和晚期 SRT 的定义分别为前列腺特异性抗原值 <0.5 和≥0.5 ng/ml 时进行的 SRT。
多变量 Cox 模型测试了 SRT 与无 SRT 对死亡和癌症特异性死亡的影响。Simon-Makuch 方法测试了每个风险组内的生存差异。
总体而言,805 例和 1574 例患者被归类为 EAU 低危和高危 BCR。幸存者的中位随访时间为 BCR 后 54 个月。对于低危 BCR,早期 SRT 的 12 年总生存率为 87%,无 SRT 为 78%(p=0.2),癌症特异性生存率为 100%,无 SRT 为 96%(p=0.2)。对于高危 BCR,早期 SRT 的 12 年总生存率为 81%,无 SRT 为 66%(p<0.001),癌症特异性生存率为 98%,无 SRT 为 82%(p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,早期 SRT 降低了死亡风险(危险比[HR]:0.55,p<0.01)和癌症特异性死亡风险(HR:0.08,p<0.001)。晚期 SRT 是癌症特异性死亡的预测因素(HR:0.17,p<0.01),但不是死亡(p=0.1)。
与观察相比,接受早期 SRT 的高危 BCR 患者的生存得到改善。我们的研究结果表明,对于高危 BCR 男性,建议进行早期 SRT。相反,对于低危 BCR,观察可能是合适的选择,因为在随访期间只有 9 例低危 BCR 患者死于前列腺癌。
评估了根据欧洲泌尿外科学会生化复发(BCR)风险分类进行的挽救性放疗(SRT)对癌症特异性结局的影响。对于高危 BCR 患者,应提供 SRT,而对于低危 BCR 患者,监测可能是一种合适的选择。