Suppr超能文献

欧洲泌尿外科学会生化复发风险分类作为挽救性放疗的决策工具——一项多中心研究。

European Association of Urology Biochemical Recurrence Risk Classification as a Decision Tool for Salvage Radiotherapy-A Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2024 Feb;85(2):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.038. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The European Association of Urology (EAU) has proposed a risk stratification for patients harboring biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether this risk stratification helps in choosing patients for salvage radiotherapy (SRT).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analyses of 2379 patients who developed BCR after RP (1989-2020), within ten European high-volume centers, were conducted. Early and late SRT were defined as SRT delivered at prostate-specific antigen values <0.5 and ≥0.5 ng/ml, respectively.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Multivariable Cox models tested the effect of SRT versus no SRT on death and cancer-specific death. The Simon-Makuch method tested for survival differences within each risk group.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 805 and 1574 patients were classified as having EAU low- and high-risk BCR. The median follow-up was 54 mo after BCR for survivors. For low-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 87% versus 78% (p = 0.2) and cancer-specific survival was 100% versus 96% (p = 0.2) for early versus no SRT. For high-risk BCR, 12-yr overall survival was 81% versus 66% (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival was 98% versus 82% (p < 0.001) for early versus no SRT. In multivariable analyses, early SRT decreased the risk for death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55, p < 0.01) and cancer-specific death (HR: 0.08, p < 0.001). Late SRT was a predictor of cancer-specific death (HR: 0.17, p < 0.01) but not death (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Improved survival was recorded within the high-risk BCR group for patients treated with early SRT compared with those under observation. Our results suggest recommending early SRT for high-risk BCR men. Conversely, surveillance might be suitable for low-risk BCR, since only nine patients with low-risk BCR died from prostate cancer during follow-up.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The impact of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) on cancer-specific outcomes stratified according to the European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk classification was assessed. While men with high-risk BCR should be offered SRT, surveillance might be a suitable option for those with low-risk BCR.

摘要

背景

欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)提出了一种针对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后生化复发(BCR)患者的风险分层。

目的

评估这种风险分层是否有助于选择接受挽救性放疗(SRT)的患者。

设计、设置和参与者:对在十个欧洲大容量中心接受 RP 后发生 BCR 的 2379 例患者(1989-2020 年)进行了分析。早期和晚期 SRT 的定义分别为前列腺特异性抗原值 <0.5 和≥0.5 ng/ml 时进行的 SRT。

结局测量和统计分析

多变量 Cox 模型测试了 SRT 与无 SRT 对死亡和癌症特异性死亡的影响。Simon-Makuch 方法测试了每个风险组内的生存差异。

结果和局限性

总体而言,805 例和 1574 例患者被归类为 EAU 低危和高危 BCR。幸存者的中位随访时间为 BCR 后 54 个月。对于低危 BCR,早期 SRT 的 12 年总生存率为 87%,无 SRT 为 78%(p=0.2),癌症特异性生存率为 100%,无 SRT 为 96%(p=0.2)。对于高危 BCR,早期 SRT 的 12 年总生存率为 81%,无 SRT 为 66%(p<0.001),癌症特异性生存率为 98%,无 SRT 为 82%(p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,早期 SRT 降低了死亡风险(危险比[HR]:0.55,p<0.01)和癌症特异性死亡风险(HR:0.08,p<0.001)。晚期 SRT 是癌症特异性死亡的预测因素(HR:0.17,p<0.01),但不是死亡(p=0.1)。

结论

与观察相比,接受早期 SRT 的高危 BCR 患者的生存得到改善。我们的研究结果表明,对于高危 BCR 男性,建议进行早期 SRT。相反,对于低危 BCR,观察可能是合适的选择,因为在随访期间只有 9 例低危 BCR 患者死于前列腺癌。

患者概况

评估了根据欧洲泌尿外科学会生化复发(BCR)风险分类进行的挽救性放疗(SRT)对癌症特异性结局的影响。对于高危 BCR 患者,应提供 SRT,而对于低危 BCR 患者,监测可能是一种合适的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验