• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旅行负担与地区贫困之间相互作用对胰腺癌患者的影响。

Implications of the interaction between travel burden and area deprivation for patients with pancreatic cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.

Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2023 Oct;226(4):515-522. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.06.013
PMID:37355377
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fragmentation of care and distance traveled are classically surrogates for poor access to care, but little is known about how social determinants of health interact with travel burden to affect survival for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). We sought to characterize the individual and composite impact of these factors.

METHODS

20769 patients treated for PC between 2005 and 2019 in the Texas Cancer Registry were included. The Area Deprivation Index and Poverty Index were used to quantify social determinants of health. Survival analyses were performed at 2 years as well as subgroup analysis on patients with the greatest travel burden.

RESULTS

Improved survival was associated with FC (HR 0.74, CI 0.71-0.77) and distance from an accredited cancer center (Quartile 4 HR 0.90, CI 0.81-1.00). High ADI led to worse outcomes while low ADI led to improved outcomes with increasing travel burden.

CONCLUSIONS

This data shows a complex relationship between travel burden and survival for patients with pancreatic cancer where stratifying by area deprivation reveals divergent outcomes and the potential to exacerbate disparities.

摘要

简介

医疗服务碎片化和就诊距离是医疗服务可及性差的典型替代指标,但对于健康的社会决定因素如何与旅行负担相互作用,从而影响胰腺癌(PC)患者的生存,人们知之甚少。我们旨在描述这些因素的个体和综合影响。

方法

在德克萨斯癌症登记处,2005 年至 2019 年间共纳入 20769 例接受 PC 治疗的患者。使用区域贫困指数和贫困指数来量化健康的社会决定因素。在 2 年时进行生存分析,并对旅行负担最大的患者进行亚组分析。

结果

生存改善与 FC(HR 0.74,CI 0.71-0.77)和距离认可癌症中心的距离(四分位距 4 HR 0.90,CI 0.81-1.00)相关。高 ADI 导致结局较差,而低 ADI 导致随着旅行负担的增加而改善结局。

结论

该数据显示了胰腺癌患者的旅行负担与生存之间的复杂关系,通过按区域贫困程度进行分层,可以揭示出不同的结果,并有可能加剧差异。

相似文献

1
Implications of the interaction between travel burden and area deprivation for patients with pancreatic cancer.旅行负担与地区贫困之间相互作用对胰腺癌患者的影响。
Am J Surg. 2023 Oct;226(4):515-522. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
2
Travel distance and its interaction with patient and hospital factors in pancreas cancer care.胰腺癌治疗中的旅行距离及其与患者和医院因素的交互作用。
Am J Surg. 2021 Apr;221(4):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.023. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Impact of nationwide centralization of oesophageal, gastric, and pancreatic surgery on travel distance and experienced burden in the Netherlands.全国范围内食管、胃和胰腺手术的集中化对荷兰旅行距离和经验负担的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;48(2):348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.023. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
Impact of travel distance to the treatment facility on overall mortality in US patients with prostate cancer.美国前列腺癌患者就诊距离对总死亡率的影响。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 1;123(17):3241-3252. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30744. Epub 2017 May 4.
5
Distance Traveled to Head and Neck Cancer Provider: A Measure of Socioeconomic Status and Access.头颈部癌症医疗服务利用情况:社会经济地位和医疗可及性的衡量指标。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Feb;162(2):193-203. doi: 10.1177/0194599819892015. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
Association of Distance Traveled for Surgery with Short- and Long-Term Cancer Outcomes.手术行程距离与癌症短期和长期预后的关联。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3444-3452. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5242-z. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Association Between Geographic Access to Cancer Care, Insurance, and Receipt of Chemotherapy: Geographic Distribution of Oncologists and Travel Distance.获得癌症治疗的地理便利性、保险与化疗接受情况之间的关联:肿瘤学家的地理分布与出行距离
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3177-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1558. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
8
Analysis of travel burden and travel support among patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center in the Southeastern United States.美国东南部综合癌症中心治疗患者的旅行负担和旅行支持分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 22;32(7):451. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08656-3.
9
The influence of geographical access to health care and material deprivation on colorectal cancer survival: evidence from France and England.获得医疗保健的地理便利性和物质匮乏对结直肠癌生存率的影响:来自法国和英国的证据。
Health Place. 2014 Nov;30:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
10
Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.前往高容量中心就医与食管癌患者生存率提高相关。
Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):743-749. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001702.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric review of journal articles on pancreatic cancer: insights into productivity and impact.胰腺癌期刊文章的文献计量学综述:对生产力和影响力的洞察
Ann Pancreat Cancer. 2025 Mar 30;8. doi: 10.21037/apc-24-22. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
2
Stakeholder Perspectives on Telehealth Effectiveness, Facilitators, and Barriers for Wheelchair Service Provision: A Needs Analysis.利益相关者对远程医疗在轮椅服务提供方面的有效性、促进因素和障碍的看法:一项需求分析。
Int J Telerehabil. 2025 Jun 12;17(1):6682. doi: 10.63144/ijt.2025.6682. eCollection 2025.
3
The Impact of Social Determinants on Pancreatic Cancer Care in the United States.
社会决定因素对美国胰腺癌护理的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 6;17(12):1898. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121898.