Suppr超能文献

[2021年法国共同决策的促进因素与障碍:癌症领域全国性调查]

[Facilitators and barriers to shared decision-making in France in 2021: National survey in cancer].

作者信息

Milan Léna, Doucène Sandra, Lenoir Gilbert, Farsi Fadila, Moumjid Nora, Blot François

机构信息

Université Paris Cité, laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Association Cancer Contribution (www.cancercontribution.fr), 39, rue Camille-Desmoulins, 94800 Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Bull Cancer. 2023 Sep;110(9):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2023.04.019. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Shared-decision making (SDM) combines clinical expertise of the healthcare professional with patient's knowledge, values and preferences. This survey explores from a patient perspective, the implementation, facilitators and barriers of SDM in oncology in France in 2021.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From August to October 2021, the digital platform Cancer contribution conducted an online survey relayed by 11 patient associations.

RESULTS

Out of 916 responses, 727 were analyzed: 394 from patients with hematological malignancies [HM], 185 with breast cancer [BC], 93 with other solid tumors [ST] and 55 with multiple cancers [MC]. Among the participants, 47.2 % reported that they participated in a decision about their health management, with a significant variation according to the pathology (BC 43.8 %, HM 41.1 %, ST 57 %, MC 60 %, P=0.01), and regardless of age and gender. Two-thirds felt comfortable with the shared decision-making process, in relation with the time allocated and the information provided, regardless of the pathology. In addition, emotions, uncertainty and lack of information are the main reasons quoted by patients to explain their lack of ease in making a decision related to their health.

CONCLUSIONS

In this survey, less than half of the patients declared that they have been enrolled in a SDM approach, this rate varying according to the type of solid tumor or hematological malignancy. This study shows that to improve the implementation of SDM in routine clinical practice in cancer, sufficient time and use of decision aids are needed.

摘要

引言

共同决策(SDM)将医疗保健专业人员的临床专业知识与患者的知识、价值观和偏好相结合。本调查从患者的角度探讨了2021年法国肿瘤学中SDM的实施情况、促进因素和障碍。

患者与方法

2021年8月至10月,数字平台“癌症贡献”开展了一项由11个患者协会转播的在线调查。

结果

在916份回复中,分析了727份:394份来自血液系统恶性肿瘤(HM)患者,185份来自乳腺癌(BC)患者,93份来自其他实体瘤(ST)患者,55份来自多种癌症(MC)患者。在参与者中,47.2%报告称他们参与了有关自身健康管理的决策,根据病理情况有显著差异(BC为43.8%,HM为41.1%,ST为57%,MC为60%,P=0.01),且与年龄和性别无关。三分之二的人对共同决策过程感到满意,这与分配的时间和提供的信息有关,与病理情况无关。此外,情绪、不确定性和信息不足是患者提到的解释他们在做出与健康相关决策时感到不轻松的主要原因。

结论

在本次调查中,不到一半的患者宣称他们采用了SDM方法,这一比例因实体瘤或血液系统恶性肿瘤的类型而异。本研究表明,为了在癌症的常规临床实践中改善SDM的实施,需要足够的时间并使用决策辅助工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验