Laboratório de Neurociências (LIM-27), Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
UConn Center on Aging, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;94(3):1105-1119. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230250.
The assessment of language changes associated with visual search impairment can be an important diagnostic tool in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum.
Investigate the performance of an eye-tracking assisted visual inference language task in differentiating subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia from cognitively unimpaired older adults (controls).
We assessed a group of 95 older adults (49 MCI, 18 mild dementia due to AD, and 28 controls). The subjects performed the same task under multiple experimental conditions which generate correlated responses that need to be taken into account. Thus, we performed a non-parametric repeated measures ANOVA model for verbal answers, and a linear mixed model (LMM) or its generalized version for the analysis of eye tracking variables.
Significant differences were found in verbal answers across all diagnostic groups independently of type of inference, i.e., logic or pragmatic. Also, eye-tracking parameters were able to discriminate AD from MCI and controls. AD patients did more visits to challenge stimulus (Control-AD, -0.622, SE = 0.190, p = 0.004; MCI-AD, -0.514, SE = 0.173, p = 0.011), more visits to the correct response stimulus (Control-AD, -1.363, SE = 0.383, p = 0.002; MCI-AD, -0.946, SE = 0.349, p = 0.022), more fixations on distractors (Control-AD, -4.580, SE = 1.172, p = 0.001; MCI-AD, -2.940, SE = 1.070, p = 0.020), and a longer time to first fixation on the correct response stimulus (Control-AD, -0.622, SE = 0.190, p = 0.004; MCI-AD, -0.514, SE = 0.173, p = 0.011).
The analysis of oculomotor behavior along with language assessment protocols may increase the sensitivity for detection of subtle deficits in the MCI-AD continuum, representing an important diagnostic tool.
评估与视觉搜索障碍相关的语言变化可以成为阿尔茨海默病(AD)连续体中的重要诊断工具。
研究眼动追踪辅助视觉推理语言任务在区分轻度认知障碍(MCI)或 AD 痴呆与认知正常的老年人(对照组)中的表现。
我们评估了一组 95 名老年人(49 名 MCI、18 名轻度 AD 痴呆和 28 名对照组)。受试者在多个实验条件下执行相同的任务,这些条件会产生相关的反应,需要加以考虑。因此,我们对口头回答进行了非参数重复测量方差分析模型,对眼动追踪变量进行了线性混合模型(LMM)或其广义版本的分析。
在所有诊断组中,无论推理类型(逻辑或语用)如何,在口头回答方面都存在显著差异。此外,眼动追踪参数能够区分 AD 与 MCI 和对照组。AD 患者对挑战刺激的访问次数更多(Control-AD,-0.622,SE=0.190,p=0.004;MCI-AD,-0.514,SE=0.173,p=0.011),对正确反应刺激的访问次数更多(Control-AD,-1.363,SE=0.383,p=0.002;MCI-AD,-0.946,SE=0.349,p=0.022),对干扰刺激的注视次数更多(Control-AD,-4.580,SE=1.172,p=0.001;MCI-AD,-2.940,SE=1.070,p=0.020),对正确反应刺激的首次注视时间更长(Control-AD,-0.622,SE=0.190,p=0.004;MCI-AD,-0.514,SE=0.173,p=0.011)。
分析眼动行为与语言评估方案相结合,可能会提高在 MCI-AD 连续体中检测到细微缺陷的敏感性,成为一种重要的诊断工具。