Department of Veterinary Pathology &Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Malaysia.
Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Malaysia.
Trop Biomed. 2023 Mar 1;40(1):55-64. doi: 10.47665/tb.40.1.012.
Gastrointestinal parasites (GIPs) in elephants have been reported in several studies over the last decades. Nonetheless, comprehensive data on clinicopathology of elephant GIPs, parasite burden threshold value, and the effectiveness of conventional anthelmintic drugs are still lacking. Herein, we have systematically reviewed the available knowledge on elephant GIPs identified among different parts of the world based on their prevalence, epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, treatment, and control. Two electronic databases were searched for publications that met the inclusion criteria. About19 English journal articles published between year of 2011- 2021 were included. The main GIPs reported in elephants were Cyathostomidae (at least 14 species), Ancylostomidae, Haemonchus contortus, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Oesophagostomum columbianum, Oesophagostomum aceleatum, Ascarids, Trichurids, Strongyloides, Anophlocephalidae, flukes, and Coccidia across different parts of the world, including Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, India, Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa. Most elephants show no clinical signs until the equilibrium between parasite and host is disturbed. The common diagnostic methods for GIPs are traditional direct smear, faecal floatation, sedimentation, and McMaster egg counting technique, all involving morphological identification. However, some articles described the use of molecular detection to characterise common GIPs of elephants. Although benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones group of anthelmintic are the most conventional GIPs treatment and control for captive and semi-captive elephants, there is limited data on the threshold value of faecal egg count as the baseline for treatment decision. Over the last decades, various studies regarding elephant GIPs have been conducted. However, more focused and systematic studies are required to enhance our knowledge in multiple aspects of elephant parasitology to find effective solutions and improve elephant health.
过去几十年的多项研究报告了大象的胃肠道寄生虫(GIP)。然而,关于大象 GIP 的临床病理、寄生虫负担阈值和常规驱虫药物的有效性的综合数据仍然缺乏。在此,我们根据流行情况、流行病学、病理学、诊断、治疗和控制等方面,对世界各地已识别的大象 GIP 的现有知识进行了系统回顾。我们在两个电子数据库中搜索了符合纳入标准的出版物。共纳入了 2011 年至 2021 年期间发表的 19 篇英文期刊文章。在全世界范围内,报告的主要 GIP 包括 Cyathostomidae(至少 14 种)、Ancylostomidae、 Haemonchus contortus、Trichostrongylus colubriformis、Oesophagostomum columbianum、Oesophagostomum aceleatum、Ascarids、Trichurids、Strongyloides、Anophlocephalidae、吸虫和球虫。在包括马来西亚、印度尼西亚、泰国、缅甸、斯里兰卡、印度、肯尼亚、尼日利亚和南非在内的不同地区,大多数大象在寄生虫和宿主之间的平衡被打破之前没有明显的临床症状。GIP 的常见诊断方法是传统的直接涂片、粪便漂浮、沉淀和 McMaster 卵计数技术,所有这些方法都涉及形态学鉴定。然而,一些文章描述了使用分子检测来鉴定大象常见的 GIP。虽然苯并咪唑类和大环内酯类驱虫药是圈养和半圈养大象最常用的 GIP 治疗和控制药物,但关于粪便虫卵计数作为治疗决策基准的阈值值的数据有限。过去几十年,针对大象 GIP 进行了多项研究。然而,需要更有针对性和系统的研究来增强我们在大象寄生虫学多个方面的知识,以找到有效的解决方案并改善大象的健康状况。