Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia, 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 Jul;228(6):1425-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02658-3. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
Prospective Memory (PM) entails a set of executive processes primarily associated with the activation of frontal and parietal regions. Both the number of PM-targets to be monitored (i.e. task load) and the relationship between the type of PM-targets and the ongoing (ONG) task (i.e. task focality) can impact executive monitoring and PM performance. In the present imaging study, we manipulated load and focality of an event-based PM task to test the hypothesis that common resources engage in situations requiring high levels of cognitive control: that is, in high-load (i.e. monitor multiple PM-targets) and non-focal conditions (i.e. monitor at the same time letters' identity and color). We investigated monitoring-related and detection-related processes by assessing behavior and brain activity separately for ONG trials (monitoring) and PM-targets (detection). At the behavioral level, we found a significant interaction between load and focality during detection, with slowest reaction times for focal, high-load PM-targets. The imaging analyses of the detection phase revealed the activation of the left intraparietal sulcus in the high-load conditions. Both in the monitoring and the detection phases, we found overlapping effects of non-focality and low-load in the fusiform gyrus. Our results suggest that under low-load conditions, cognitive control operates via early selection mechanisms in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex. By contrast, high-load conditions entail control at later processing stages within the dorsal parietal cortex. We conclude that load and focality operate via different mechanisms, with the level of task load largely determining how cognitive control selects the most relevant information.
前瞻性记忆(PM)需要一系列主要与额叶和顶叶区域激活相关的执行过程。要监测的 PM 目标数量(即任务负载)以及 PM 目标类型与正在进行的(ONG)任务之间的关系(即任务焦点)都可以影响执行监测和 PM 表现。在本成像研究中,我们操纵了基于事件的 PM 任务的负载和焦点,以检验以下假设:即需要高水平认知控制的情况下,共同资源会参与其中:即在高负载(即监测多个 PM 目标)和非焦点条件(即同时监测字母的身份和颜色)。我们通过分别评估 ONG 试验(监测)和 PM 目标(检测)的行为和大脑活动来研究监测相关和检测相关的过程。在行为水平上,我们在检测过程中发现负载和焦点之间存在显著的相互作用,焦点、高负载 PM 目标的反应时间最慢。检测阶段的成像分析显示,在高负载条件下,左顶内沟的激活。在监测和检测阶段,我们都发现非焦点和低负载在梭状回中具有重叠的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在低负载条件下,认知控制通过腹侧枕颞皮质中的早期选择机制发挥作用。相比之下,高负载条件需要在背侧顶叶皮层的后期处理阶段进行控制。我们得出结论,负载和焦点通过不同的机制起作用,任务负载的水平在很大程度上决定了认知控制如何选择最相关的信息。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023-7
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018-8
J Gen Psychol. 2023
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020-9-23
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019-11-14
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017-10
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015-7-14
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015-2-19