Ballhausen Nicola, Schnitzspahn Katharina M, Horn Sebastian S, Kliegel Matthias
Department of Psychology, University of Geneva, Boulevard du Pont d'Arve 40, CH- 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland.
School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Mem Cognit. 2017 Oct;45(7):1113-1125. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0720-5.
The retention phase of a prospective memory (PM) task poses different challenges, including demands to store or maintain an intended action and to realize the right moment for action execution. The interplay of these processes in younger and older adults has not been explored so far. In this study, the authors examined the impact of maintenance load and task focality on PM in 84 younger and in 83 older adults. Results indicated that PM performance and ongoing task response times were strongly affected by maintenance load and age. However, a focality effect only emerged when maintenance load was low but not when attentional resources were deployed for maintaining a more demanding intention. These findings suggest that maintenance and monitoring requirements compete for similar attentional resources. Furthermore, maintenance load may affect postretrieval processes through its impact on working-memory resources, which can restrain the typical advantage of focal over nonfocal PM tasks.
前瞻性记忆(PM)任务的保持阶段带来了不同的挑战,包括存储或维持预期行动以及在正确时刻执行行动的要求。到目前为止,尚未探究年轻人和老年人中这些过程的相互作用。在本研究中,作者考察了84名年轻人和83名老年人中保持负荷和任务焦点对前瞻性记忆的影响。结果表明,前瞻性记忆表现和正在进行的任务反应时间受到保持负荷和年龄的强烈影响。然而,仅当保持负荷较低时才会出现焦点效应,而当注意力资源用于维持更具挑战性的意图时则不会出现。这些发现表明,保持和监测需求竞争相似的注意力资源。此外,保持负荷可能通过其对工作记忆资源的影响来影响检索后过程,这可能会抑制焦点性前瞻性记忆任务相对于非焦点性任务的典型优势。