Baraza Teresa, Hasenmueller Elizabeth A
WATER Institute, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, United States; Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States.
WATER Institute, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, United States; Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States.
Water Res. 2023 Aug 15;242:120204. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120204. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
Microplastics (plastics <5 mm) are emerging contaminants that have been detected in virtually all environments. While microplastic research in terrestrial surface waters has been proliferating, microplastic contamination in subsurface environments remains understudied. Karst terrains may be particularly susceptible to microplastic pollution because the presence of large dissolution openings allows fast transport of water through these systems, facilitating the introduction of surface contaminants into subsurface habitats. Furthermore, few studies address the prevalence and movement of microparticles composed of semisynthetic and modified natural materials, despite their known ecotoxicity. Our study therefore aims to identify anthropogenic (i.e., synthetic, semisynthetic, and treated natural) microparticle extent, sourcing, and transport in subsurface karst environments. To do so, we examined a cave spring under variable flow conditions, finding that anthropogenic microparticles were present in all samples and were most frequently fibrous and clear. The mean anthropogenic microparticle concentration during baseflow was 9.2 counts/L but increased up to 81.3 counts/L during floods, indicating their enhanced mobilization when relatively dilute, acidic, and sediment-rich event water entered the cave. These results suggest that anthropogenic microparticles may originate from surface recharge or sediment resuspension within the cave. When we analyzed a subset of microparticles with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), we found that cellulose of known (i.e., dyed) and suspected (i.e., clear) anthropogenic origin was the most abundant material type. We nevertheless confirmed the presence of microplastics in the cave stream under all flow conditions, with the most common polymer being polyethylene. Both the concentrations and relative fractions of microplastics were higher during floods compared to baseflow, indicating their increased transport during high flow events. We also observed that microplastic polymer types diversified as discharge increased. Our study gives new insight into how anthropogenic microparticle contamination is transported through karst landscapes that can help inform debris mitigation strategies to protect ecosystems and water resources.
微塑料(塑料颗粒尺寸<5毫米)是新出现的污染物,几乎在所有环境中都已被检测到。虽然陆地地表水的微塑料研究不断增多,但地下环境中的微塑料污染仍未得到充分研究。岩溶地区可能特别容易受到微塑料污染,因为大量溶蚀孔洞的存在使水能够快速通过这些系统,便于地表污染物进入地下栖息地。此外,尽管已知由半合成和改性天然材料组成的微粒具有生态毒性,但很少有研究涉及这些微粒的存在情况和移动情况。因此,我们的研究旨在确定地下岩溶环境中人为来源(即合成、半合成和经过处理的天然)微粒的程度、来源和传输情况。为此,我们在不同水流条件下对一个洞穴泉进行了检测,发现所有样本中都存在人为来源的微粒,且最常见的是纤维状和透明的。基流期间人为来源微粒的平均浓度为9.2个/升,但在洪水期间增加到81.3个/升,这表明当相对稀释、酸性且富含沉积物的事件水进入洞穴时,它们的活动性增强。这些结果表明,人为来源的微粒可能源自地表补给或洞穴内沉积物的再悬浮。当我们用傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)分析一部分微粒时,我们发现已知(即染色的)和疑似(即透明的)人为来源的纤维素是最丰富的材料类型。不过,我们证实了在所有水流条件下洞穴溪流中都存在微塑料,最常见的聚合物是聚乙烯。与基流相比,洪水期间微塑料的浓度和相对比例都更高,这表明它们在高流量事件期间的传输增加。我们还观察到,随着流量增加,微塑料聚合物类型变得更加多样。我们的研究为了解人为来源的微粒污染如何通过岩溶地貌传输提供了新的见解,这有助于为保护生态系统和水资源的碎片减缓策略提供信息。