• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈机能不全患者行三角 3 点式和 McDonald 式宫颈环扎术的妊娠结局比较:一项初步研究。

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of triangular 3-bites and mcdonald techniques of cervical cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency: A pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Life International Hospital, Awka and Life Specialist Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria.

Human Reproduction Unit, Institute of Maternal and Child Health, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Nigeria.

出版信息

Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 May;26(5):630-635. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_830_22.

DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_830_22
PMID:37357481
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical cerclage is the procedure of choice for preventing preterm birth due to cervical insufficiency. Despite the simplicity of the McDonald's method of cerclage application, it is still technically difficult to take four bites around the cervix before knotting. There is a need to develop a simpler method of cervical cerclage application with similar or improved pregnancy outcomes.

AIM

This is to compare the ease/duration of application and pregnancy outcomes of the new triangular three-bite cervical cerclage technique and McDonald's technique in women with cervical insufficiency.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a pilot study with 20 participants that met the inclusion criteria. They were randomly grouped into triangular three-bite method (n = 10) and McDonald's method (n = 10). The pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups with the Chi-square test and student's t-test. A P value of <.05 was set as level of significance.

RESULTS

The sociodemographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the pregnancy outcome (spontaneous miscarriage P = 1.00, preterm delivery P = 0.61, and neonatal birthweight P = 0.96). However, the duration of cerclage application (5.98 ± 1.79 minutes vs. 14.25 ± 7.5 minutes; P <.002) and estimated blood loss (29 ± 9.94 mls vs. 48.5 ± 25.82 mls; P = .04) were significantly lower in the triangular three-bite arm than in the McDonald's arm.

CONCLUSION

The new triangular three-bite technique has similar pregnancy outcomes with the conventional McDonald's technique and has shown a lower duration of procedure and blood loss. Since this is a pilot study, a well-structured randomized control trial to compare the two methods is recommended.

摘要

背景

宫颈环扎术是预防因宫颈功能不全导致早产的首选方法。尽管 McDonald 法宫颈环扎术的应用方法简单,但在宫颈周围进行四针打结前,技术上仍具有一定难度。因此,需要开发一种更简单的宫颈环扎术应用方法,以获得类似或更好的妊娠结局。

目的

比较新型三角三针宫颈环扎术与 McDonald 法在宫颈机能不全患者中应用的简便性/操作时间和妊娠结局。

患者与方法

这是一项纳入符合标准的 20 例患者的前瞻性研究,将其随机分为三角三针法组(n = 10)和 McDonald 法组(n = 10)。采用卡方检验和学生 t 检验比较两组的妊娠结局。P 值<.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者的社会人口学特征相似。两组间妊娠结局(自然流产 P = 1.00、早产 P = 0.61、新生儿出生体重 P = 0.96)无统计学差异。然而,三角三针法组的环扎操作时间(5.98 ± 1.79 分钟 vs. 14.25 ± 7.5 分钟;P<.002)和估计出血量(29 ± 9.94 mls vs. 48.5 ± 25.82 mls;P =.04)均显著低于 McDonald 法组。

结论

新型三角三针法与传统 McDonald 法具有相似的妊娠结局,且操作时间和出血量更少。由于这是一项初步研究,建议开展一项设计良好的随机对照试验来比较两种方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of triangular 3-bites and mcdonald techniques of cervical cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency: A pilot study.宫颈机能不全患者行三角 3 点式和 McDonald 式宫颈环扎术的妊娠结局比较:一项初步研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 May;26(5):630-635. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_830_22.
2
Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes of History-Indicated and Ultrasound-Indicated Cervical Cerclage: A Retrospective Cohort Study.有指征的和超声指征的宫颈环扎术妊娠结局的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Jan 9;2023:8782854. doi: 10.1155/2023/8782854. eCollection 2023.
3
McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: impact of body mass index.麦克唐纳与希罗德卡尔宫颈环扎术预防早产:体重指数的影响
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Oct;32(20):3408-3414. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1465037. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Pregnancy outcomes and superiorities of prophylactic cervical cerclage and therapeutic cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency pregnant women.宫颈机能不全孕妇预防性宫颈环扎术与治疗性宫颈环扎术的妊娠结局及优势
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;297(6):1503-1508. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4766-9. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
5
[Comparison of maternal-fetal outcomes between laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage and McDonald cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency].宫颈机能不全女性腹腔镜宫颈峡部环扎术与麦克唐纳环扎术母婴结局的比较
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 25;58(2):84-90. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220908-00569.
6
The impact of cerclage placement on gestational length in women with premature cervical shortening.宫颈环扎术对宫颈缩短孕妇妊娠时间的影响。
J Perinat Med. 2023 Apr 18;51(6):782-786. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0444. Print 2023 Jul 26.
7
Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length.希罗德卡尔手术与麦克唐纳宫颈环扎术预防宫颈短的女性早产的比较
Am J Perinatol. 2007 Jan;24(1):55-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958165. Epub 2006 Dec 27.
8
History-indicated cervical cerclage in management of twin pregnancy.病史提示的宫颈环扎术在双胎妊娠管理中的应用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):517-523. doi: 10.1002/uog.20192. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
Bridge Suture for Successful McDonald Emergency Cerclage.用于成功进行麦克唐纳紧急宫颈环扎术的桥式缝合术。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(5):446-452. doi: 10.1159/000452099. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
10
Comparison of transvaginal cervical cerclage versus laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study from a single centre.经阴道宫颈环扎术与腹腔镜下腹膜宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全的比较:来自单一中心的回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 17;22(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05108-w.