So Ho, Chow Evelyn, Cheng Isaac T, Lau Sze-Lok, Li Tena K, Szeto Cheuk-Chun, Tam Lai-Shan
Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Feb;31(2):222-230. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231181714. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
Patients with systemic lupus erythematous were vulnerable to severe coronavirus disease 2019 infection and the negative impact of disrupted healthcare delivery. Telemedicine has been a popular alternative to standard in-person care during the pandemic despite the lack of evidence.
This was a 1-year pragmatic randomized-controlled trial. Patients followed at the lupus nephritis clinic were randomized to either telemedicine or standard follow-up in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the telemedicine group were followed up via videoconferencing. Standard follow-up group patients continued conventional in-person outpatient care. The primary outcome of the study was the proportion of patients in low disease activity after 1 year. Secondary outcomes included cost-of-illness, safety, and various patient-reported outcomes.
From 6/2020 to 12/2021, 144 patients were randomized and 141 patients (telemedicine: 70, standard follow-up: 71) completed the study. At 1 year, 80.0% and 80.2% of the patients in the telemedicine group and standard follow-up group were in lupus low disease activity state or complete remission, respectively (= 0.967). Systemic lupus erythematous disease activity indices, number of flares and frequency of follow-ups were also similar. There were no differences in the cost-of-illness, quality of life or mental health scores. However, significantly more patients in the telemedicine group (41.4% vs 5.6%; < 0.001) required switch of mode of follow-up and higher proportion of them had hospitalization during the study period (32.9% vs 15.5%; = 0.016). Being in the telemedicine group or not in low disease activity at baseline were the independent predictors of hospitalization (odds ratio: 2.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-6.1, odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-6.7, respectively) in the post hoc analysis.
In patients with systemic lupus erythematous, telemedicine predominant follow-up resulted in similar 1-year disease control compared to standard care. However, it needed to be complemented by in-person visits, especially in patients with unstable disease.
系统性红斑狼疮患者易感染重症2019冠状病毒病,且医疗服务中断会对其产生负面影响。尽管缺乏证据,但在疫情期间,远程医疗已成为替代标准面对面诊疗的一种流行方式。
这是一项为期1年的实用随机对照试验。狼疮性肾炎门诊随访的患者按1:1的比例随机分为远程医疗组或标准随访组。远程医疗组患者通过视频会议进行随访。标准随访组患者继续接受传统的面对面门诊治疗。该研究的主要结局是1年后疾病活动度低的患者比例。次要结局包括疾病成本、安全性以及各种患者报告的结局。
从2020年6月至2021年12月,144例患者被随机分组,141例患者(远程医疗组:70例,标准随访组:71例)完成了研究。1年后,远程医疗组和标准随访组分别有80.0%和80.2%的患者处于狼疮低疾病活动状态或完全缓解(=0.967)。系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数、病情复发次数和随访频率也相似。疾病成本、生活质量或心理健康评分方面没有差异。然而,远程医疗组中需要改变随访方式的患者显著更多(41.4%对5.6%;<0.001),且在研究期间住院的比例更高(32.9%对15.5%;=0.016)。事后分析中,处于远程医疗组或基线时疾病活动度不低是住院的独立预测因素(优势比分别为:2.6;95%置信区间:1.1 - 6.1,优势比:2.7,95%置信区间:1.1 - 6.7)。
在系统性红斑狼疮患者中,与标准护理相比,以远程医疗为主的随访在1年疾病控制方面效果相似。然而,需要辅以面对面就诊,尤其是疾病不稳定的患者。